I'll stop now.
Though others, I'm sure, will go on and on and on and on... :sleep
:smh
Printable View
I'll stop now.
Though others, I'm sure, will go on and on and on and on... :sleep
:smh
No, we wouldn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie Michelle
How many times do people have to ignore you? How many times do people have to clearly state that they do not care? No matter how often people express disinterest, you continue to fantasize that somebody actually cares.
Let me explain it to you as clearly as possible.
There is not a single person on this forum that cares about you say. You are a spam-bot that continually derails threads with completely off-topic cut-and-paste posts. This has been made clear to you many times, yet you continue to make an ass of yourself.
If you want to discuss conspiracy theories, you're on the wrong website.
You are worse than the Jehovah's Witnesses. At least you can close your door on them.[/size]
And a suggestion: Put a link in your signature, to whatever site it is that you grab your news articles from. If anyone is interested, they'll check it out themselves.
Your above statements are false. There are a number of people here who are thankful for my speaking the truth. I know this because they have told me.Quote:
Originally Posted by The American Nightmare
Nor have I spammed in my entire life. I post information where it is relevant.
And unlike you and those of your ilk, I do not believe in any conspiracy theories, such as the U.S. government's lying, self-serving, a-historical, a-factual, and provably false official fairy tale conspiracy theory concerning the 9/11 attacks.
Below is some truth for you to fuel your cognitive dissonance:
"Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?," Prof. Steven E. Jones, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, to be contained in "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001," Research in Political Economy, Vol. 23, Paul Zarembka, editor (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, Spring 2006):
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
"Thinking About 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK," Prof. James H. Fetzer, University of Minnesota, to be contained in 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, editors (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc.], 2006) and in The 9/11 Conspiracy, James H. Fetzer, editor (Chicago, Illinois: Catfeet Press [an imprint of Open Court Publishing Company], forthcoming):
http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/fetzerexpandedx.doc
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm
"The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True," Prof. David Ray Griffin, based on a lecture given in New York, New York on October 15 and 16, 2005:
http://www.911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html
For more on government-staged terrorism, see the below post by me:
"Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism," September 30, 2005:
http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopi...ibertyandtruth
number of ppl happy w/ u "speaking truth"?????
name 3 you heartless weirdo
Where do you keep coming up with these fucking conspiracy theories. Its like a broken record.
Your smoking the wrong stuff buddy.
Pretty damn hard to refute what I refuse to read. I actually have a life to live. You may possibly be an intelligent son-of-a-bitch and I don't doubt that. Maybe you need to get a job or something? Seems you have too much idle time to produce all these ramblings. Too many smarts can make a person really dumb. I know all too many IQ people who have to call a plumber when the moving parts inside a toilet tank malfunction. Now that's some smart sum-bitches.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie Michelle
>> This << is relevant?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie Michelle
In addition, I should point out that you are erroneously using the term cognitive dissonance.
As far as naming people who are thankful for my speaking the truth, I'm not sure they want me to name them, since many have thanked me via personal communication. But I could name a whole heck of a lote more people than three.Quote:
Originally Posted by tsntx
And there is no need for you to project your own condition upon me, other than your need to attempt to reduce me to your own pathetic level.
Unlike you and those of your ilk, I do not believe in any conspiracy theories, such as the U.S. government's lying, self-serving, a-historical, a-factual, and provably false official fairy tale conspiracy theory concerning the 9/11 attacks.Quote:
Originally Posted by ManOfSteel
Below is some truth for you to fuel your cognitive dissonance:
"Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?," Prof. Steven E. Jones, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, to be contained in "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001," Research in Political Economy, Vol. 23, Paul Zarembka, editor (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, Spring 2006):
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
"Thinking About 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK," Prof. James H. Fetzer, University of Minnesota, to be contained in 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, editors (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc.], 2006) and in The 9/11 Conspiracy, James H. Fetzer, editor (Chicago, Illinois: Catfeet Press [an imprint of Open Court Publishing Company], forthcoming):
http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/fetzerexpandedx.doc
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm
"The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True," Prof. David Ray Griffin, based on a lecture given in New York, New York on October 15 and 16, 2005:
http://www.911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html
For more on government-staged terrorism, see the below post by me:
"Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism," September 30, 2005:
http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopi...ibertyandtruth
Hopefully he has a mother and two brainwashed sisters.Quote:
Originally Posted by tsntx
Yet more proof why: some species eat their young.