Question for the Brits...........................

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Rossatron

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flabbybody

Seems stupid to give the bad guys in Afghan a high profile target like Prince Harry.
Why put the Royal kid in harm's way? The UK public already hate their government for sleeping with Bush and his crazy war

---

Congrats on the yanks though for blowing his cover. No one knew he was there therefore he wasn't any more of a target than the rest. Now thanks to those across the pond he is. Real smooth.

---

It was an Australian woman's magazine that blew Harry's cover so don't get your limey balls in a bunch at the Yanks rossatron

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news...ghanistan.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flabbybody

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Rossatron

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flabbybody

Seems stupid to give the bad guys in Afghan a high profile target like Prince Harry.
Why put the Royal kid in harm's way? The UK public already hate their government for sleeping with Bush and his crazy war

---

Congrats on the yanks though for blowing his cover. No one knew he was there therefore he wasn't any more of a target than the rest. Now thanks to those across the pond he is. Real smooth.

---

It was an Australian woman's magazine that blew Harry's cover so don't get your limey balls in a bunch at the Yanks rossatron

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news...ghanistan.html

---

LMFAO.... Nothing like the facts to take the wind out someone's sails. Ouch...

-Quinn

Not blaming the yanks for everything is a hard habit to break. :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tomfurbs

Not blaming the yanks for everything is a hard habit to break. :lol:

---

LOL. True enough, but at least we can't be blamed for the Spice Girls. Some horrors are truly domestic in origin.

-Quinn

LMFAO! Touche, mon brave! haha. Well, at least Posh is now you guys responsibility now she's stateside...

Hahaha, you can keep Posh, thanks for taking her off our hands :P

Prince Harry was never in Afghanistan, this is all a PR swindle to make the Royals look more egalitarian. He probably got no further than Dubai to shoot that recent footage.

Fuck the royal parasites

lol, republicans...

They should have kept him there, yes hes a high profile target, but if that draws out more taleban to eat .50 cal rounds, then surely thats a good thing. Bleed the fuckers dry.

Anyway, how does him being in the military make him more egalitarian? The military don't exactly 'exert the equality of mankind'.

At least the royals actually DO something, rather than be famous for absolutely fuck all like the rest of todays vacuous 'celebrities'

Harry looks a lot like that Hewwit guy (Diana's lover) not at all like Charles.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tstv_lover

In New Zealand, where the queen is still head of state, the royal family are seen as quaint but archaic and pretty irrelevant. Still a good money earner for the UK.

---

It's pretty much the same way in the UK. People complain about how much they cost but they're a huge tourist attraction for the Septics, Japs and Chinks!