Jesus Christ, Michael. I go away for a few months and come back to discover that you are still shilling the same fictional nonsense that we debunked, what, a year ago? You know that this stuff is false, and yet you continue to peddle it anyway. Why bother? What do you get out of purposefully being a dissembler? Why spend such an enormous chunk of your life posting falsehoods to a shemale bulletin board? Even if your life truly is that empty, surely playing solitaire or raking leaves would be a more constructive and rewarding use of your time.
You only get one life. This is how you’re going to spend it?
You post this fuzzy jpeg over and over again, and yet you can’t be bothered to simply explain its relevance. I’ve asked you at least twice before to show me where Joe Wilson’s Who’s Who entry states, “My wife works for the CIA.” Because that, Michael, is what’s at issue here.Quote:
Originally Posted by White_Male_Canada
This is just a lie. Very silly, and false. Presented entirely without documentary evidence.Quote:
Originally Posted by White_Male_Canada
This story has no basis in fact whatsoever. It is entirely based on a single Washington Times story by Bill Gertz, who has a terrible reputation for simply making things up. Gertz’s story includes no named sources at all, and attributes the blown cover fairy tale to a single anonymous intelligence official.Quote:
Originally Posted by White_Male_Canada
Even if this story were true (and it’s not – see below), it’s of no relevance to Fitzgerald’s investigation. According to Gertz, “everyone” didn’t know; the Russian and Cuban intelligence agencies knew. And that would still be classified. It appears that Gertz’s fictional anonymous source is transferring classified information, which is, I hope you’ll agree, a federal crime.
Moreover, you can’t read the Amici Curiae brief because it was never filed. Victoria Toensing, a known dissembler with no credibility on this issue, filed a motion for permission to file an Amici Curiae brief. The motion was accompanied by no affidavits, and was subsequently denied without dissent by the DC Circuit Court, primarily because there was no factual evidence at all to support the fantastic claims made by Toensing.
But why rely on Gertz and Toensing’s fantastic imagination when we have direct confirmation of Plame’s covert status from DCI Hayden? This from the opening statement by Rep. Henry A. Waxman Chairman, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, March 16, 2007:
Quote:
[DCI] General Hayden and the CIA have cleared these following comments for today's hearing.
During her employment at the CIA, Ms. Wilson was under cover.
Her employment status with the CIA was classified information prohibited from disclosure under Executive Order 12958.
At the time of the publication of Robert Novak's column on July 14, 2003, Ms. Wilson's CIA employment status was covert.
This was classified information.