Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
I am the one with the Degree in Marketing and I assure you I have used my degree to take a product, ME, and turn it into a business via the skills I learned in College. Lifes skills? Get the fuck out of here. I have used those skills obtained to work for the IRS for four years working in HR and tax preparation and then moved onto the Adult side. And I commented on my Degree because Franklin said I was stupid, furthest thing from the truth. I am one of the most successful TS models business wise and I did that MARKETING me who who didnt fit the "look", "size" or "popularity" of many models that have come and gone.
And as a business owner, model, publicist for 5 models and one of the largest TS companies, my own toy line, website, affiliate, etc I can tell you that his statement about stats concerning solo scenes vs hardcore was WRONG according to my producing of not only website but DVD scenes via the sales, VOD, and signups I receive.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WendyWilliams
I am the one with the Degree in Marketing and I assure you I have used my degree to take a product, ME, and turn it into a business via the skills I learned in College. Lifes skills? Get the fuck out of here. I have used those skills obtained to work for the IRS for four years working in HR and tax preparation and then moved onto the Adult side. And I commented on my Degree because Franklin said I was stupid, furthest thing from the truth. I am one of the most successful TS models business wise and I did that MARKETING me who who didnt fit the "look", "size" or "popularity" of many models that have come and gone.
And as a business owner, model, publicist for 5 models and one of the largest TS companies, my own toy line, website, affiliate, etc I can tell you that his statement about stats concerning solo scenes vs hardcore was WRONG according to my producing of not only website but DVD scenes via the sales, VOD, and signups I receive.
Wait you have a degree in marketing....................oh great. Market and Business degrees are known to do worst than every other major in business.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
WW, I was joking. I respect your skills and what you have accomplished. As you know, I do not like your film projects and subject matter, but its is your huste, its legal, and you are good at it. Just not thirsty about hardcore scenes. Franklin was wrong about causation but you cant ignore the cats passion. Plus what he was commenting about was a sort of standard deviation between solo and hardcore scenes and the producers wrongful use of sales as their data points w/o including other varibles size of population, costs, pricing, marketing, thirstiness, time of the year, economic conditions, thinking about who is sending emails to our CIA director, why Homeland went off course late in the year, who can point a glock at a child, and other random thoughts and even quality of content. Obbviously some of these cannot be quantified. And I was not mocking the school shooting tragedy. But like gun sales, porn sales spiked after the school shooting tragedy. So to use sales as the only statistical varible is a little dishonest and a lot of lack of marketing skills. You want a repeat customer not a one time buyer, and not understanding the Franklin's of the world, and mocking him, is very short-sighted.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
And Franklin, play fair. You should never mock a person's journey. You are being ornery for just cause... respect a person accomplishment and appreciate a person's effort.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FRANKLIN
@ Seanachi, are you trying to make call out peeople? Okay.....I'm only judging this week's updates. Jenna Rachel is the only quality model for this week's updates.
You have even said that you have shot TVs for TS sites. How is are they good quality models when they are not TS women?
How is it insane to want quality models? Is everyone going to be in Hazel's league? No. Asking for quality models is very reasonable.
Do you think Black T-Girls have a good amount of quality models? I'm so curious about this answer.
Oh fuck off, you just prove the point that you refuse to listen.
In YOUR opinion, Jenna Rachels is the only good model on this site this week. Get it, YOUR opinion!
"shemale" is a porn word. We've been over this countless times and your that soggy loaf you use for a brain, still can't absorb that "shemale" does not mean "transsexual". We almost never use lifestyle TV's but will use girls early in in transition or considering transition.
Do I think BTG has a good amount of quality models. Absolutely. That's why it's so successful.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FRANKLIN
Shemale Yum does not say TV Yum. The site's name is Shemale. The site does not say that TV men will be featured. Shemales are TS women. TVs are not transsexuals. A TV should not be featured on any TS site.
NO no no. Why can't you fucking read and absorb instead of basing your own theories of fact. "shemale" does not mean "TS".
Fucking read.
As it is I've just been through all the models for 2012 and did not see one who is clearly a transvestite.
I define and decide what goes on my site "shemale" yum, not your assinine ideas.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FRANKLIN
If a site's name is Shemale, Tranny, TS, Trassexual, or any other term people rightfully or wrongfully use to advertise TS should only feature TS women.
ENTIRELY INCORRECT. That's your wrong definition.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FRANKLIN
M2F transsexuals are women. TVs are not women.
Correct - at least you have that right.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sherm13
Plus, there are many quality black tgirl models but I do not always see them on Grooby sites.
Name ONE that has appeared on other sites but not on Grooby sites as I can't think of any.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Geezus, even I'm not bitching about the word shemale anymore. I still don't like it, and I actually do agree with Franklin's interpretation of the word, but moving on from it isn't going to happen overnight regardless.
Personally, I think Seanchai has made a lot of improvements this year. I don't have a single new complaint.
I know, I know: hell is a bit chilly today. :lol:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sherm13
Plus, there are many quality black tgirl models but I do not always see them on Grooby sites.
You've never heard of Black T-Girls? Seriously?! :?
~BB~
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FRANKLIN
I find most black girls to be unattractive so I would find most of them to be poor quality models. If I thought otherwise then I would be contradicting myself. I understand why people find certain body types attractive.
I understand why guys are into you. You're a very passable TS woman. However, there are many other black Ts women on the site who are clearly not passable. Some are more buff than John Cena. They don't fit into the typical standards of attractiveness.
Zzzzzzzzzzzz.
They don't fit YOUR typical standards. Clearly someone not into blacks/asians/whites/latins would have a different opinion as would someone not into BBW on a BBW site. So why don't shut up on what you are not qualified to talk about.
