Quote:
Originally Posted by Smedley
Quote:
why do you guys have to either question sharpton or jackson position
"Hymie town"? "White interlopers"? Tawana Brawley? Laundering drug money? Accusing Sony of a racist conspiracy when Michael Jackson's album failed to sell because of his own questionable behavior? too many more to list? Let's pull our head out of the politically correct sand here. Imus sunk himself and is paying a heavy price, but Sharpton and Jackson, two guys who pull out the race card for their own profit whenever the chance presents itself, are the last two guys who should be calling for somebody's head when it comes to racist comments.
Who
should be calling someone out for racist comments? Please enlighten us, since no other Jackson/Sharpton basher apparently in here has stepped up and provided a name of ONE white civil rights leader on the forefront of this incident. Or, care to tell us how anyone taking Imus on should do it without the vehicle of the media?
This comment by Imus would be a non-issue if it weren't for guys like Jackson and Sharpton putting the heat on, as Imus's comments would have either been ignored or swept under the carpet as has been the case in the past. The problem with all you Jackson or Sharpton bashers, is that you are unable to see these things through the position of a minority.Your warped premise -- that minority leaders such as Jackson and Sharpton are on equal footing with those in power they take on -- is the problem. In your eyes we live in a perfect world, and nuisances such as Jackson and Sharpton should not be seen or heard. By the way, care to show me where progress has been made on any front throughout history without some leader(s) taking the bull by the horns and working for progress? I suppose you would have been against those "niggers" who marched in Selma Alabama at one time too, right? How dare they take a stand against the Jim Crow status quo, right?!