yeah, CLINTON QUITS

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KellyShore

And he keeps talking about "change" and doesn't tell us how.


People are so dumb.

All they listen to is the "CHANGE" part.

---

NOTE: this is part two of my monthly post:

Kelly, Obama is the candidate. Live with it.

Regarding "Change" , ANYTHING else than republican style policy is better.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mbf

Time for my monthly post.

You guys mostly sound as if Barack Obama has won already. Far from beeing so I am afraid.

Prepare yourself for idiotic and brutal five months ahead, with the oh-so-balanced media hammering it into you, that he is a muslim, a "liberal", wants to take away your weapons, has no experience in foreign affairs or the economy, thrown in subtle and not-so-subtle racism.

The anti-Obama witchhunt will be gruesome.

And now, I am not even a yank, but that doesn't hold me back from commenting: Like it or not, the US-president IS somewhat the first political leader of the western world ( say OECD-countries).

If you are American who does not travel abroad, you have NO idea how much the international reputation of the USA suffered the last seven, eight years. Your image changed from beeing admired and respected to beeing loathed and ridiculed, not even feared any longer.

In short, any member of this very board, who will still vote republican, is a buffoon, helplessly foolish, and deserves the next four years downhill for america (too bad, good people will suffer as well).

And as comments regarding Obama's final nomination show, some of you still haven't realized how bad the US need a change.

---

"Prepare yourself for idiotic and brutal five months ahead, with the oh-so-balanced media hammering it into you, that he is a muslim. . ."

When did Obama convert to Islam? I must have missed that, and who cares if he did?

I like the part about the rest of the world laughing at the US. You people do realize that we're just waiting for the last Soviet era nuke to wear out, then it's no more Mr. Nice Guy. We will enslave the world and steal your wine and cheese. Oh, wait, we've already got that.

:lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by worthy2

Bush and Clinton paid to be president and in return they let corporate america run the white house as it still does today. It's all a cult following and you will never see the best possible person to actually help this country as long as campaigns are paid off by special interest groups. That's why this country is in a depression and things will only get worse.

---

Umm Clinton is the only president in years that we ended with a surplus and a high economy then Bush took over dummy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mbf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KellyShore

And he keeps talking about "change" and doesn't tell us how.


People are so dumb.

All they listen to is the "CHANGE" part.

---

NOTE: this is part two of my monthly post:

Kelly, Obama is the candidate. Live with it.

Regarding "Change" , ANYTHING else than republican style policy is better.

---

Not if she goes independant.

Kelly if obama gets elected president will you move to canada?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KellyShore

She'd of still won the vote, she had 18 million he had 13 million even if you took those two states away.

---

Dumber than a bag of hammers, shut up and look pretty.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KellyShore

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mbf

Time for my monthly post.

You guys mostly sound as if Barack Obama has won already. Far from beeing so I am afraid.

Prepare yourself for idiotic and brutal five months ahead, with the oh-so-balanced media hammering it into you, that he is a muslim, a "liberal", wants to take away your weapons, has no experience in foreign affairs or the economy, thrown in subtle and not-so-subtle racism.

The anti-Obama witchhunt will be gruesome.

And now, I am not even a yank, but that doesn't hold me back from commenting: Like it or not, the US-president IS somewhat the first political leader of the western world ( say OECD-countries).

If you are American who does not travel abroad, you have NO idea how much the international reputation of the USA suffered the last seven, eight years. Your image changed from beeing admired and respected to beeing loathed and ridiculed, not even feared any longer.

In short, any member of this very board, who will still vote republican, is a buffoon, helplessly foolish, and deserves the next four years downhill for america (too bad, good people will suffer as well).

And as comments regarding Obama's final nomination show, some of you still haven't realized how bad the US need a change.

---

AGREED! Thats why I mentioned what he said in a debate where Hilary laughed at him when he said well I'd just walk into Iran in talk to them. Then she asked back, you'd put your presidency and the America in total trouble that way. You don't know what they would do and its easy to get hurt that way. And then he recanted his statement lol

And he keeps talking about "change" and doesn't tell us how.


People are so dumb.

All they listen to is the "CHANGE" part.


My favorite moment of the debate was after the clip of Clinton making fun of Obama for being a dreamer and creating a painting of a world uniting and problems being solved (”and the clouds will open up and the sun will shine” … etc etc.), as if he'll just wave a wand and it will happen cause he keeps on saying "It's Time for Change" with no STANCE OF HOW!

---

So you're going to be voting for Obama then?

I don't think she realize what mbf was saying to have agreed with him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by goldensamba

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quinn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by goldensamba

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quinn

What that a shot at me? If so, perhaps you should educate yourself as to what has transpired before opening your "yap."

Fact: Hillary promised to create 200,000 jobs for Upstate New York.

Fact: Hillary then bragged about her working to bring in the very type of outsourcing-oriented company (Tata Consulting Services) that caused the region to actually lose 32,000 jobs.

Moreover, you might want to consider obtaining so much as a rudimentary education on the role senators play in attracting federal and investment dollars to their states. The fact is that a powerful senator's efforts can have a fairly substantial impact upon a state's economy.

-Quinn

---

That is called pork and that is not technically part of a Senator's job. It's something we should despise not promote. A senator's job is the help form NATIONAL policy not govern a state therefore their impact is minimal on their home state when compared to what a governor does. Before you start telling people to get educated you should know what you are talking about yourself.

---

LMFAO… You’re kidding me, right? Seriously, let me see if I can follow your imbecilic argument. You tried to tell me that Clinton, as a senator, has “very little or nothing to do with how good or bad the state is doing” – despite the fact that she herself clearly thought being a senator would make her capable of attracting 200,000 jobs to bolster her state’s economy? Hmmmmm. Clearly Senator Clinton – who, unlike you, actually is a senator – disagrees with your factually unsustainable position.

That’s not surprising when you consider that anyone with even the most rudimentary knowledge of how Congress functions knows that a powerful senator can, and often does, have a substantial impact upon a state’s economy. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, to cite but one example, has brought in some $3 billion to prop up that state’s anemic economy since 1991 (a huge number when you consider the size of West Virginia's economy).

So.......the next time your sycophantic ass decides to try and score some brownie points by inserting yourself into a discussion with some snarky comment, you might want to first ensure that you have so much as a child's grasp of the topic at hand. That way, just maybe, you can avoid looking like a complete moron the way you do now.

P.S. Your weak attempt to distract the focus away from your failed argument by including crap about what is or is not, technically speaking, a senator's job is irrelevant and has nothing to do with your initial point. Nice try though, Gump.

http://www.destructoid.com/wp-conten...6/10/moron.jpg

---

A job description is a job description and even though a senator can do something about and beyond that their job lies elsewhere. You can spin it all you want but facts are facts. Learn the actual job of a senator before you spout off.

---

Let’s review in as simple a fashion as possible so you don't get too confused:

You inserted yourself into a discussion by making a snarky and condescending comment. To make matters worse, you did so while making an argument that has the intellectual respectability and factual sustainability of a Flat Ear Society newsletter. You then – upon seeing the farcical notion you put forth get intellectually eviscerated – backpedaled to an argument completely unrelated to your initial one in an effort to save face. Though tacit in nature, a clearer admission of failure would be hard to find anywhere. :lol: Well done, professor. :roll:

-Quinn

http://media.g4tv.com/images/blog/20...2873135493.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by worthy2

Politics has failed in every sense of the word whether its democrat or republican. You will NEVER see the best person as president because of special interest groups donating money and expecting favors once their guy is elected. Obama is not as corrupt and Mccain and Clinton but he still corrupt.

---

:claps :claps :claps :claps