Very nice. I love the stubble on her legs!Quote:
Originally Posted by Wil
Printable View
Very nice. I love the stubble on her legs!Quote:
Originally Posted by Wil
I'm just gonna bump one of my favorite old threads, I don't have any new pics to contribute but maybe some of you do!
So does anyone have any new hot hairy asian ass pics?
WTF?! That's just WRONG. Don't those girls own mirrors? I'm sorry, but that's as gross as obesity or facial hair on a woman. Perhaps even more so. Thank god I'm as hairless as I am. But even if I wasn't, I would have resolved that from day one. A disposable razor is not exactly an unobtainable item.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicole Dupre
Just because razors are available, doesn't mean everyone should use them. As far as I am concerned, it is as simple as this: Human females have hair as a result of their mammalian heritage. The degree and type of hair is variable, but it's always there unless you remove it.
Isn't it odd that we as a culture define the feminine ideal as having hairless legs, underarm, and privates? This means that our primary attraction is to a bodytype that is non-human.
I'm not trying to convince you that hairy asses are beautiful, I'm just making the point that our ideas of beauty are totally subjective. I'm glad you are hairless, since you like that, but I find our culture's current obsession with hairlessness to be disturbing.
Being hairless is NOT "non-human". That's nonsense. But I'm not questioning your tastes either. Some men hate seeing tattooed women and some love it, so you're talking to someone who can grasp the difference between conventional and unconventional tastes. Neither is more valid. But face it. Obese and/or hairy women are generally not what men find to be attractive, because 99% of the time it's a case of the woman being perceived as lazy.Quote:
Originally Posted by dgs925
I have to agree with this post.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicole Dupre
But it isn't an intrinsic human trait. The human form must be modified to be hairless. The point I was alluding to was this: If you tallied up what the most desirable traits for a woman to have are, concerning measurements and facial features and everything, and then combine them into one person - you would end up with someone who is not human. Imagine a barbie doll blown up life size and that's what guys want. By not human, I mean it would be impossible to produce that person using human DNAQuote:
Originally Posted by Nicole Dupre
Having a preference is one thing, but I've met a couple guys recently, (young guys - around 20 years old) who say they flat-out refuse to eat pussy if the girl isn't totally shaved. They just aren't attracted to a woman if she has pubic hair, and I find that to be disturbing. I don't really ask those guys for their opinion on anything after this. In many parts of the US if you are female and don't shave a few key places like your underarms and legs, then you are going to be ostracized and not get a guy.
I feel the same way about people who can't stand uncut cock. That is what human penises look like for fuck's sake.
lol I understand your point, and I swear I'm not trying to put you down. I actually thought you were kidding when you resurrected the thread, and I'm not trying to browbeat you on what turns you on here.Quote:
Originally Posted by dgs925
But by your own logic, the US/Western gene pool will be much less hairy due to natural selection. Right now, human beings are less hairy than ever because we've been wearing clothing for so many millennia. Some things are simply vestigial at this point. The best examples are probably the human appendix and male nipples.
I totally was, I was prompted by this thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicole Dupre
You beating me would definitely turn me on, but that's a little off topic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicole Dupre
Yes, but that isn't the only natural selection we are setting ourselves up for.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicole Dupre