Please, explain how that's a false statement.
Do the math! :shrug
Printable View
Let me just make sure that I understand what you were trying to say: you're saying that the other half of new HIV cases are men who have sex with women? Less than one percent of all reported HIV cases are self reported as "men who ONLY have sex with women". It is virtually unheard of in this country for a woman to infect a man with HIV. Throw all the tomatoes you want, but this is a cold, hard fact.
HIV is a GAY disease in this country. This is the largest group affected and the only group where we have not made strides to reduce infection rates.
Just a quick question: do all of the detractors of truvada also agree that heroin addicts should not be provided with free, clean syringes? I mean, just DON'T use heroin and you won't get HIV. All well and good, but in the parts of this country where clean needle programs are in place, HIV infections have been significantly reduced among another group disproportionately affected by the scourge of HIV.
Yeah, you keep chucking up those strawman arguments, that'' convince us! :shrug
Let's get this straight wes. You advocate bareback sex proving you are taking truvada... Unlike your earlier enthusiastic advocacy of bareback before the advent of truvada?
^ There is a difference between proclaiming a personal preference and "advocacy". I AM an advocate of people taking truvada because it is an extremely effective tool against HIV. What one does after that is their choice and business.
http://www.washingtonblade.com/2010/...a-gay-disease/
You're missing the point. Please read this article. Dan Savage has also come out saying the same thing.
Men who have sex with men are 44 to 86 times more likely to contract HIV in the USA. That means gay men, bisexual men, and TS AND THEIR ADMIRERS!!! Believe what you want, but the AIDS industry have done a great job making people think that this disease doesn't discriminate. It does.
A good read here to open your eyes:
http://aids.gov/hiv-aids-basics/hiv-...01/statistics/
If i put it in CAPITAL LETTERS does it have more veracity?
^Nope. Just wanted to make sure it stood out since continually in this thread it appears that respondents are simply spouting off what comes to mind instead of actually reading what I'm posting.