Re: We're Not Gay And We're Not Straight
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Chase_Mcthirsty
for me it's the woman in question that turns me on not just a dick.
Same for me, I'm VERY picky...but we do want a woman with a dick...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wiltthestilt
To say you have no particular interest in that combination (girl + dick) strikes me as disingenuous. But still, if I'm putting the work into finding a TS it's because I want variety, and not because I spun the wheel and it landed on tranny.
Indeed...
Re: We're Not Gay And We're Not Straight
I've been following along for a little while now, and I think it's about time I toss my two cents in...
Labels work for this topic just about as well as they do for politics. No one fits the left/right paradigm exactly. In fact, it's a false paradigm to begin with. One of the ways of overcoming that fact in the political field is to plot opinions out on the Nolan chart. It has its own flaws, but it's fairly accurate for getting a sense of your own philosophy and where and how it relates to others.
So why not come up with a version of the Nolan chart for sexual orientation? If we really want to be able to put some sort of quantifiable value to the various possibilities and where each of us stands among them, it seems to me that would be the way to go.
Re: We're Not Gay And We're Not Straight
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BrassVillanueva
I've been following along for a little while now, and I think it's about time I toss my two cents in...
Labels work for this topic just about as well as they do for politics. No one fits the left/right paradigm exactly. In fact, it's a false paradigm to begin with. One of the ways of overcoming that fact in the political field is to plot opinions out on the Nolan chart. It has its own flaws, but it's fairly accurate for getting a sense of your own philosophy and where and how it relates to others.
So why not come up with a version of the Nolan chart for sexual orientation? If we really want to be able to put some sort of quantifiable value to the various possibilities and where each of us stands among them, it seems to me that would be the way to go.
Appreciate the thought BV, but it's not really necessary...I think all that needed to be said has been...
Re: We're Not Gay And We're Not Straight
I agree, I just figure it'd be something to point people to when they ask "THE" question. It's not like this board hasn't been prone to floods of "am I gay?" posts :D
Re: We're Not Gay And We're Not Straight
One way I look at is like this; if you separate the two, which turns you on more?? A woman born with a pussy?? Or the thought of a raging hard cock??
Normally, or I should say previously, I was just about woman an all their variations, but a switch flipped when I first saw that perfect combo of a girl with 'special' parts.
Cocks NOT attached to TS do nothing for me.
Re: We're Not Gay And We're Not Straight
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wiltthestilt
Where I'll agree with the OP is that if you are registered here (and not trans-woman) you are probably interested in a dick on a girl.To say you have no particular interest in that combination (girl + dick) strikes me as disingenuous. If you are truly genitalia indifferent, then why bother with TS's at all since feminine trans-women are so rare (relatively speaking)?
More than likely if you are here you are turned on by the novelty of a dick on a girl or else there is something that intrigues you about a male transforming into a female.
I don't give a shit about a lady's pussy if I'm not attracted to the rest of her; likewise, I don't give a shit about a TS's dick if I don't like how she looks with cloths on. But still, if I'm putting the work into finding a TS (through eros, at a TS party, ect.) it's because I want variety, and not because I spun the wheel and it landed on tranny.
really good point.
Re: We're Not Gay And We're Not Straight
Quote:
Originally Posted by
robertlouis
Absolutely right.
English prick. :dancing:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Prospero
I have an Anglo-Irish prick actually.. and proud of it, ya tartan scrotum bag
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jericho
I scratched a Scot once and out came 40 proof!
Y'know I prefer this way more to the usual persnickety hen-pecking that goes on with you characters.
Re: We're Not Gay And We're Not Straight
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BrassVillanueva
I agree, I just figure it'd be something to point people to when they ask "THE" question. It's not like this board hasn't been prone to floods of "am I gay?" posts :D
Viva Zapata Tube!
Re: We're Not Gay And We're Not Straight
Quote:
Originally Posted by
giovanni_hotel
One way I look at is like this; if you separate the two, which turns you on more?? A woman born with a pussy?? Or the thought of a raging hard cock??
Normally, or I should say previously, I was just about woman an all their variations, but a switch flipped when I first saw that perfect combo of a girl with 'special' parts.
Cocks NOT attached to TS do nothing for me.
Yes they need to be attached to someone that feels, acts, and believes they are a girl. Their appearance need not be fully transitioned but their mind needs to be. Then I love to play with her cock.
Cross dressing is often part of the transition journey, but it is a common path with the TV journey - well I am not taking that journey. I don't think I can handle those early in transition where they are unsure if boy or girl.
1 Attachment(s)
Re: We're Not Gay And We're Not Straight
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dino Velvet
Y'know I prefer this way more to the usual persnickety hen-pecking that goes on with you characters.
And you can go to hell too, damn colonial! The impertinence. Pshaw, sir.
