Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
giovanni_hotel
ALL tgirl consumers judge girls on their LOOKS. All porn consumers judge actors on their appearance. Is this a suddenly a new concept??
and thats the problem right there.guys see a few shemale scenes,see an escort or two and feel like they can weigh in on what it is to be ts.
you have multiple ts woman of various transition experience telling you that you cant judge whos a ts or not solely based on looks but your not acknowledging that lol.
why if i told you i truly feel like a man.i just do this shit for kicks.here i am looking all "passable" and shit but dont feel like a woman at all.i know a few girls who have implants and look pretty as hell but dont feel like woman.they just look the part.
i also know trans woman who look like shaq but spent their whole lives living and feeling like woman.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
giovanni_hotel
Not going to speak for FRANKLIN, but I've seen some girls who just aren't even close to pulling off being a trans-woman in photos.
This "...close to pulling off being a trans-woman in photos..." proves a complete and utter failure to grasp what TS is. You have NO further credibility to speak on the issue.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FRANKLIN
I answered your question twice. Go back a page or two.
No you didn't. You put down what I stated you'd put down, which is to say,
Being TS us what qualifies you to be on a TS site.
Surely I don't have to explain the concept of circular reasoning to someone as smart as you? Like I said, I have NO problem if you judge a person's TS status solely on looks... Just admit it and lose all credibility to speak seriously on the subject.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
amberskyi
and thats the problem right there.guys see a few shemale scenes,see an escort or two and feel like they can weigh in on what it is to be ts.
you have multiple ts woman of various transition experience telling you that you cant judge whos a ts or not solely based on looks but your not acknowledging that lol.
why if i told you i truly feel like a man.i just do this shit for kicks.here i am looking all "passable" and shit but dont feel like a woman at all.i know a few girls who have implants and look pretty as hell but dont feel like woman.they just look the part.
i also know trans woman who look like shaq but spent their whole lives living and feeling like woman.
You don't understand what is being said. I understand that it is a long process for a TS. However, consumers want the best looking models. There is nothing wrong with wanting the best girls like Hazel Tuker, Kimber James, Eva Lin, and Sarina Valentina. They're who many consumers want to see featured on every site.
I understand that not all TS women are very feminine. A person's status as a TS cannot be based on looks. A TS woman is not required to be feminine. A TS woman may not be in transition. However, that is not up for debate. That's not being agrued.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GroobyKrissy
This "...close to pulling off being a trans-woman in photos..." proves a complete and utter failure to grasp what TS is. You have NO further credibility to speak on the issue.
You all aren't getting that we're having a convo about SELLING and COMMODIFYING the concept of transgendered sexuality as a product.
We're not defining what it meaning in a very personal sense to be transgendered.
If you're asking me to purchase your vid because you're TG, you have to bring more to the table than just being a 'tgirl', however you want to define it.
Amber is making rhetorical points, but Amber is also beautiful. She knows what her product is and how to sell it.
You can't bend the space-time continuum of TS porn just to make a political point.
Porn of any kind is about selling the GOODS to your audience, and being successful in any business begins with knowing your audience foremost.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FRANKLIN
Too many people in the TS porn industry are sensitive about judging a TS's looks. I understand that transitioning is not an easy process. However, we are also paying consumers. Our voices should be heard in praise and in criticism. If you are a model in the sex industry then you should expect to be judged based on your looks and performances. Your looks will be judged the most.
Again with the reading comprehension problem. I could care less who you do or do not find ATTRACTIVE. When you go beyond that however and start saying girls are "bad" (read: unworthy) to be on a site like SMY because you question their TS status... That I have a problem with.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GroobyKrissy
what qualifies you to be on a TS site.
I will try a crack at this.
The only qualification is for someone to appear on a TS site, whether CD/TS, is to appear feminine and interested in the scene. Look at Kayla Coxx for example. As Kayla, she delivers great scenes but that person is also a gay porn actor. Still, Kayla Coxx scenes are more feminine and passionate than a majority of other TS pornstars. That is my two cents, anyway.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
This thread needs some maturity injected int it:
Here's a bat with a boner.
http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/bat_36abb6_786485.jpg
You're welcome ;)
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GroobyKrissy
Again with the reading comprehension problem. I could care less who you do or do not find ATTRACTIVE. When you go beyond that however and start saying girls are "bad" (read: unworthy) to be on a site like SMY because you question their TS status... That I have a problem with.
Damn! Read the damn thread again. I have not questioned anyone's status. Seachi has said that he shoots TVS on his TS sites. I do not know who most of these people are. I did not call out anyone besides Jamie. Jamie Markum is the only TV I know he has shot.
Re: X-critic also against Transsexuals
Quote:
Originally Posted by
giovanni_hotel
You all aren't getting that we're having a convo about SELLING and COMMODIFYING the concept of transgendered sexuality as a product.
We're not defining what it meaning in a very personal sense to be transgendered.
If you're asking me to purchase your vid because you're TG, you have to bring more to the table than just being a 'tgirl', however you want to define it.
Amber is making rhetorical points, but Amber is also beautiful. She knows what her product is and how to sell it.
You can't bend the space-time continuum of TS porn just to make a political point.
Porn of any kind is about selling the GOODS to your audience, and being successful in any business begins with knowing your audience foremost.
No. You're backtracking now because you and Franklin have both spewed your crap and find yourselves in a corner. Your original response to Franklin's post about TV's being featured on TS sites directly contradicts what you're now stating.
Stand by your words or just simply say you were wrong. I expect neither though.
