To try not to be a victim of criminals using guns against us. We do have a right to protect ourselves , families and properties. IMO, a very stupid question.
Printable View
off topic;
Duh! It is almost always the case that the women's decision will take into account her individual plans, her current and likely future circumstances and how well prepared she is to take on the responsibilities of motherhood. While she is yet not a mother, she may or may not decide to become one. Who are you to tell her she's being immoral to consider exactly these factors?
You claim that you're pro-choice. Time to tell us the reasoning that lands you on that side of the fence.
Hi hippiefried!!! Long time, no see. Kisses.
So Loud Love, I see that so far you've gone all the back to 2013 in order to downthumb twenty odd items I wrote. And no rebuttals offered. Really? That's rather like shooting a girl in the back.
Twenty odd items!! That's crazy…get your point across with one or two like he did to me. Dating back to January of 2013. I was a different person in 2013…back in 2013 I wasn't a member of the NRA, I didn't own twenty five firearms, ten pairs of camouflage pants, and I had never shot a moose from a helicopter (or a motorboat; ask me how I did that).
As for shooting you in the back, maybe he thought you walked across his lawn or were somewhere near his boundary lines. But someone who down votes twenty votes without responding to a single one of them is unlikely to be the type to overreact:)
What exactly about that post do you find affirming as an American? She compared her country's love of tea, a warm flavorful slightly caffeinated beverage with our love of deadly weapons. Just prior to that she predicted a cycle of mass shootings followed by periods of collective ignorance about the history of mass shootings and their causes. Perhaps a description, probably not intended an insult, but far from a compliment.