Originally Posted by
Stavros
If this is indeed the case, why is it?
In the case of Manchester United, the argument will be based on the institutional development of the club, from its apparently benign owners, to the front and backroom staff who, one assumes, have been as enduring as the famous manager. What may not be apparent is the quality of the backroom staff, who must provide daily support to mostly young men whose minds, when not on the game, are focused on potentially destructive modes of behaviour. I seem to recall that Ferguson imposed a ban on Ryan Giggs giving interviews to the press for years. His dominant, possibly dictatorial character suggests this may be the best way to run a dressing room, but even a manager can't control what happens on the field of play, and while Ferguson has signed some useless players over the years, he has on the other hand recruited some outstanding players, creating strong defence, midfield and attacking formations -most people agree that the current weaknesses in United are the lack of a midfield bandmaster, and an ageing defence. But like Arsenal, they have well-established structures, just as Liverpool used to have, and it is noticeable that amongst Liverpool's many problems, the chaos in the boardroom of recent years has been damaging to the club.
Is it unfair to argue that City have bought their way to success? Initially this may have been true, but over the last few years I think the players have gelled as a team, and that the strengths of the defence and midfield are well-balanced with a formidable attacking force; the players seem now to understand each others strengths and will challenge United to the last minute of the last day. Unless discipline deserts them -Tevez seems to have mellowed in recent years, but Balotelli seems incapable of discipline, and Aguero wants to leave. In spite of this success, they have failed miserably in the premier European competition.
Both clubs are in the top quartile of European clubs, but are they as good as Bayern Munich, Barcelona, Real Madrid, Inter, and AC Milan?
There was a time when Liverpool were the masters of Europe -it is possible that the teams fielded in the 1970s and 1980s were amongst the best teams ever assembled, anywhere -the eviction of this team from European competition after Heysel almost certainly robbed them of two or three more European titles. The current team is pathetic in comparison; and it remains to be seen if an ageing Chelsea team is in transition or decline. That they are in the position in the table they occupy is largely due to the mediocre quality of English football clubs.