Printable View
So, just for clarity here... and since you're an expert on the topic...Quote:
Originally Posted by FRANKLIN
I would like you to put down here, in writing, what your qualifications for being featured on a "TS" site are. And if you say, "being TS" then you really are either stupid or a total fraud. Go ahead.
I take offense to people throwing out accusations of racism when it is not called for. Its not like I called every girl on the site a dog but there are few TV's who are just there because of their huge wangs and do not really look feminine at all. That look doesnt do it for me. There are plenty of black t-girls who are gorgeous.Quote:
Originally Posted by amberskyi
I will say this, I just looked at the preview section at Blacktgirls.com and the quality seems much improved from just a few years ago.
If a site's name is Shemale, Tranny, TS, Trassexual, or any other term people rightfully or wrongfully use to advertise TS should only feature TS women. If a site includes TV men then the site needs a different name. M2F transsexuals are women. TVs are not women.Quote:
Originally Posted by GroobyKrissy
Being a TS is required to be on a TS site with the sole exception of the person's hardcore partner. However, the scene should contain at least one TS.
This is funny. I'm black. I don't find most black GG women attractive. I don't find most black TS women attractive. Is that racist? No! I'm not sexually attracted to most of them. Who are you to tell someone who they should find attractive?Quote:
Originally Posted by amberskyi
so you're stupid, a fraud, AND chicken. Great!Quote:
Originally Posted by FRANKLIN
You basically said nothing... One more try?
i know just as many popular white, hispanic and asain models who in my opinion arent fem at all but are popular because of their big cocks or ability to cum a small lake.it isnt a phenomena exclusive to black tgirls but one that is common to ts porn in generalQuote:
Originally Posted by sherm13
If you think it is okay for a TS site to feature a TV then something is clearly wrong with you. Featuring a TV in a solo scene is FRAUD. The person is not a transsexual woman. The person is a man in a wig.Quote:
Originally Posted by GroobyKrissy
Care to tell us who these people are? It's difficult to fully judge your opinion without comparing the models.Quote:
Originally Posted by amberskyi
I find women attractive in general, but in terms of modeling I will say on BTG there seems to be more extremes in the models featured.
But like I said, I dig Black girls so I'd probably say at least half of the girls on BTG are alright.
Really there are so many pretty to stunning Black tgirls featured that it kinda balances out the more questionable ones.
And yeah I don't like TVs being featured and them being sold to us as 'early transition' TGs. I KNOW some of those are just gay dudes working that hustle with a wig and lipstick.
than why use black tgirls as an example of mediocre models? if you dont find black girls attractive than cool but dont try to insinuate that all black models are of poor quality. im not a fan of black men my damn self but i can realize when one fits the typical standards of attractiveness.Quote:
Originally Posted by FRANKLIN
So, basically just say that you're either chicken to put down your definitions or that you really don't know... in either case, you've pretty much lost credibility to comment further at all. I know this is coming but I really don't want to spell out why, so please make the effort to connect a few threads of logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by FRANKLIN