They're all overrated, but all things being equal I wonder how Sinatra didn't make the list of choices. :wiggle:
~BB~
Printable View
I would have to say MJ is more talented then elvis imo that is. But neither can hold a candle to freddie mercury in singing or performance, and i'll also admit james brown and mr sinatra and even bruce springsteen are better then they ever were.
sorry lisa did not know
im just playin witcha babe,the older you get the more we appreciate the music of our childhood although my kids make me listen to this new stuff i cant help but wonder what there really missing.music has transformed so much in my lifetime and i know full well that the music of today doesnt hold a candle to what i grew up with.the 60 revolution? as MC hammer would say ,,,ya cant touch this.
You can't compare Elvis and Michael Jackson. They are completely different in musical style. The only reason they are even in the same discussion is because they were both huge music/pop stars.
I personally am a much bigger Jacko fan than Elvis. Elvis never really did it for me, excluding a few of his most popular songs. Elvis just seems bland compared to Chuck Berry, Carl Perkins, and some of his other peers. Don't get me wrong, I have a huge respect for Elvis, but nothing makes me shake my booty like a classic Michael Jackson or Jackson 5 song.