Printable View
This kind of reminds me of how some gg's act. Burd I was seeing a while back totally used to slag off her ex. couldn't get it up, ugly, loser no job crap in bed etc. But then I found out he was engaged to some right fit stripper!! :lol: :lol:He may have been a oxygen thief but he obviously wasn't shite in bed!Quote:
Originally Posted by hollywoodbuckstrap
how to speak limey, lesson 1Quote:
Originally Posted by arnie666
Do I have to start providing translations for you fuking septics who spell wrong. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by tonkatoy
This kind of reminds me of how some gg's act.Girl I was seeing a while back used to be rude about her ex . couldn't get it up, ugly,loser, no job ,crap in bed etc.But then I found out he was engaged to some beautiful stripper. :D :D .He may have been a person of such idiocy he wastes oxyben but he obviously wasn't rubbish in bed.
It is really like this. Almost every provider or sex performer lies just a little bit about what they like. We are in the business of fulfilling fantasies. Yes there are top girls, but most of the girls I know prefer bottoming.
I admire Allanah a lot for her honesty. That said, I can say that, off camera, I have topped men twice. Once was a professional date where we chose to have sex after dinner and the guy pooped everywhere (gross). The other was with Christian in NYC and we both had a good time. Because of my own issue with cleanliness, I am just not interesting in fucking guys - especially virgins. To me virgin screams "I want to get fucked but I have no idea how to clean myself to get fucked". In my entire life, my first time fucking a guy in the ass was Rogue Adventures #15. In my personal life, outside of oral, I am 100% bottom unless I am fucking a GG which I do from time to time. For some reason GG's never shit on me which guys do every time I do a scene with them. Every time.
When I think straight, I think of a guy who doesn't mind me having a thing, but he doesn't really want it in his mouth or ass either. My ex-boyfriend was mostly straight, but present boyfriend is by that definition completely straight. The issue is this... You guys can get cock anywhere. gay cock, bi cock, dog cock, etc etc. Someday, I won't be able to sexually please a guy into dick and he will go elsewhere... If you are into dick, it doesn't magically go away; you are stuck with it for life. That means if I am overly hormonal or contemplating SRS, I will be concerned about my guy going out and blowing guys or other TS or what not. For some reason, this concern is 100 times as strong in me than caring whether a guy I am dating fucks GG's.
I don't judge bottoms. I think it's great as is sexual diversity. People like what they like. The last guy I dated I was with for over 5 years and he loved sucking me and did every time we were together and I never minded at all. ;-)
Personally at this point I would probably date anybody who didn't throw rocks at me. Rocks hurt. I dont care if she is ts, gg, Galgamec, or whatever. As long as she isn't a money succubus she's fine with me. Id really like to find somebody to help run the business and blah blah blah. Funny thing is, i didn't like anal with my ts gf, and i am a top, it just seems kinda gross, she was clean and all, but just not my thing I guess. Next gf will probably be gg, or maybe sheep. Sheep don't care what you like. Or maybe it will just be another rough night for the Vicki handpuppet, who knows.
Hm, I wonder what the chances are of finding a girl that simply doesn't give a fuck (pun absolutely intended) as long as you're faithful.
;)
Typical man, doesn't care if his partner gets her rocks off LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by tonkatoy
meow
FK
ok, ill get you some shoes, that should help.Quote:
Originally Posted by Felicia Katt
While there's nothing inherently wrong with having a personal preference, it is obvious that especially within the TS community a controversy will keep existing. I.e., this type of discussion will rise here from time to time (though this can be said of other subjects too, of course.).
No party in particular can be blamed for that though, as each of them has a personal for it - even if that opinion may be flawed in other people's eyes, it is still their decision to make.
But personally I believe that we would be a lot better off if we would be more open to the whole of the person rather than focusing on some aspects.
I will admit though that the world - let alone the ts community - is far from ready for that, because it requires a lot of effort and trust and it's hard to see if someone's worth all that. That's is the reason why we value some things higher than other features of person, if that suits us we might find it a reasonable gesture to deal with all the other features. For it's a man/women's wish to seek a certain degree of comfort...be it in a form of safety, pleasure or whatever.
In an ideal world we could give unknown people attention from us more credit and get a nice (maybe even longterm) experience out of it. As we all know that's not the world we live in, so we have to be more careful.
By setting a good example yourself, mankind is taking yet another small step towards that ideal (although that ideal image will never be completely perfect of course). OTOH you can always blindly or firmly go for your preference, but im not telling anyone a surprise that if everyone had that mentality, things won't turn for the better for each party.
What could help is that each party starts to respect eachother, in a way that each party wants to be respected. At least that makes us think about the way we treat others, as well our own image (do I want to be respected as a 'tranny chaser'?/Do I want to be respected as a TS, a woman or just as a person?, etc).
After doing all that 'homework' the learning part is not over, but at least we can start off at a better foot as we have developed a better level of understanding, which I think is definitely needed nowadays.
i skimmed across this thread reading the post from thos whos oppinion i care about and there was one thing i couldnt leave uncommented since i disagree with it on such a fundamental level
its actually much more fundamental (in the sense that it was discovered earlier) and its culombs law in vectorial formQuote:
Originally Posted by peggygee
http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/2...d9c628d53b.png
interestingly enough the direction of repulsion is positive