Printable View
Some of us thought a great deal of J and his posts...and anyone who says that J is posting here under a different name is totally wrong....J's wit and posting style were unique...and coming back while hiding under a new handle is not something that J would do...Quote:
Originally Posted by TJ347
Cosign.Quote:
Originally Posted by chefmike
-Quinn
I agree. Though I didn't always agree with what J had to say, I always found his posts interesting and very witty. It would be nice to have him back but I don't think he'll be returning.Quote:
Originally Posted by Quinn
I like the name. But HA peacemaker? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by chefmike
Anyway, seeing as I've suddenly decided not to be nice to everyone like I used to, maybe you can take my place as the nice guy around here. :D
Ghandi was a violent sadist by comparison. LOL...Quote:
Originally Posted by LG
-Quinn
LMFAO
What do you think of Obadiah Shoher's views on the Middle East conflict? One can argue, of course, that Shoher is ultra-right, but his followers are far from being a marginal group. Also, he rejects Jewish moralistic reasoning - that's alone is highly unusual for the Israeli right. And he is very influential here in Israel. So what do you think? uh, here's the site in question: Middle East conflict
A people unwilling to serve God is destine to be ruled by tyranny. Child abuse comes from moral relativism usually found in todays multiculturalism and perversity crowd, the global warming crowd and the replace God with government crowd. Right and wrong are defined and redefined daily by these moonbats.
Wow! And I always thought child abuse was rare among atheist intellectuals and professors of philosophy, science and mathematics. So there’s actually a link between believing that the causes of climate change are anthropogenic and child abuse? Are you just making this up as you go along or can you cite a respectable, refereed journal? If you haven’t noticed the Bible defines and redefines right and wrong in every chapter of every book. The Bible can’t even settle on one Genesis story. It has at least four contradictory stories of the life of Jesus and the new covenant is by definition a flip-flob on the old. Which is it now, do we stone adulterous wives or do we do unto them what we would have them to unto us? Moonbat :roll:Quote:
Originally Posted by q1a2z3
Secular humanism teaches children that they are just another brick in the wall and a cog in the wheel. There is nothing contradictory in the Holy Bible - people find what they want. If you go looking for contradictions you find them. Finding faith and teaching children faith in God is the best one can do. The MP crowd only tolerate other "communities" that have a moral relative foundation. They casually make fun of Christians, while it's the likes of Dawkins who are deranged. The MP crowd doesn't want to be accountable to God. The moobats on NPR regularly make fun of Huckabee and others who believe the universe was created in 6 days.
There are three Genesis stories and all three are true.
Moonbats have been successful at getting soft-headed judges to declare their hobby a "lifestyle." A hobby that goes against "be fruitful and multiply" and "evolution" that they hold up as truth, but they can't even reproduce their own kind. So much for survival of the fittest. They have worked hard to get hate crime and hate speech laws in place, which are just one step away from George Orwell's 1984's "thought crime" and an attack on the first amendment.
Dawkins speaks to taking children away from their religious parents. what a moonbat!