-
WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
woodywoodsac
Obviously you didnt study Biology either:
ALL TS's start out as a MAN, and come out with statements like "I have been born into the wrong body". blah blah.
We all know TS's are only in it for the attention they never got as a man.
At least TV's and CD's are still men and can admit to that fact.
Here is a simple analogy even YOU can understand:
Hey, lets paint this pig black and white: bingo, its now a cow.
WRONG: its still a pig... with paint on it.
There is MAN and WOMAN. Get it?
There is NOTHING in between. (apart from hermaphodites, which are a rare genetic freak of nature, as are conjoined twins etc.
So which part dont you understand? There is MAN and WOMAN.
A TS is simply a man that has taken drugs to grow breasts and grown his hair long.
Which part dont you understand? There is MAN and WOMAN.
THE END
I thought I'd re-post this from another thread but this winnit, Woodynutsac has made an excellent example of ignorance that should be made sticky for posterity.
I think the Woodsac's clear analogy (is he saying TS's are pigs or cows?) and explanation that all TS's are men who just "take drugs and grow their hair long for attention", is probably indictive of a lot of poorly educated, ill-informed, bigoted, sad little men out there who refuse to accept any other biological, psychological or other reasons for transgenderism, in all it's forms.
I believe it's also attitudes like his, which lead to further hate crimes or the fact that a 10 yr transgender who returned to school this week in the UK as a girl, was ridiculed not by other children but by adults in the area:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...want-girl.html
(Woody a 65+ yr old guy, was making fun out of a 10yr old??)
So girls, guys and everyone else. Let this serve as a clear example of how many ignorant individuals are out there and see what can be done, to maybe try and educate them a bit. I think it's sad that Kim, who is a TV and happy to be one, can't educate her tool on different types of transgenders (maybe she's realized it's a loss cause on him - after all, she only needs his arm not his brain). Personally, I'd rather drive down and kick him in his Woodwoodsac.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
seanchai
Personally, I'd rather drive down and kick him in his Woodwoodsac.
Take me! I will hold him down so you can give them a good stomping on!!
Fookin ass-wipe!
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
This board could really use a new subforum for education, too many clueless people on here and newbs with their am i gay shit.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Not XX and not XY one in 1,666 births
Klinefelter (XXY) one in 1,000 births
Androgen insensitivity syndrome one in 13,000 births
Partial androgen insensitivity syndrome one in 130,000 births
Classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia one in 13,000 births
Late onset adrenal hyperplasia one in 66 individuals
Vaginal agenesis one in 6,000 births
Ovotestes one in 83,000 births
Idiopathic (no discernable medical cause) one in 110,000 births
Iatrogenic (caused by medical treatment, for instance progestin administered to pregnant mother) no estimate
5 alpha reductase deficiency no estimate
Mixed gonadal dysgenesis no estimate
Complete gonadal dysgenesis one in 150,000 births
Hypospadias (urethral opening in perineum or along penile shaft) one in 2,000 births
Hypospadias (urethral opening between corona and tip of glans penis) one in 770 births
Total number of people whose bodies differ from standard male or female one in 100 births
Total number of people receiving surgery to “normalize” genital appearance one or two in 1,000 births
http://www.isna.org/faq/frequency
(just one little example of why people are "different" from the norm)
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
ugh really - how disgusting
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
wow. Was that in response to the comment I left on his thread about a 'manly ts' - it seems to have been deleted now... (I didn't know much moderating happened on this forum)
Those are some pretty horrible things he said. How insensitive do you have to be not to realise that comparing people to pigs or calling them 'freaks of nature' is going to upset them?!
What is he even doing on this forum if he's so ill-inclined towards transgenderism?
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Woodywoodsac and the rest of the Kim's band of merry men need to just get out. It gets old seeing these people invade threads and spread their hate. Whats the point of trying to market "kim" to a bunch of people who aren't here for that shit anyways.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Isn't it possible that woodywoodsac and Kim are one and the same person?
Whatever his post plumbed new levels of ignorance and prejudice.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
I don't think what Woody says has anything to do with ignorance or a lack of knowledge. What I feel is going on here is exactly what goes on all over this frekin' forum,,,,, HATE. People on this forum have a lot of hate inside themselves and they are free to use it anytime in their posts cause this forum is very lightly moderated. I think Woody's choice of words are just hate words, something to get back at people he doesn't like, to upset people,, especially the tgirls.
Go to the thread titled "Why are tgirls so sexy" and see how some of those posts are hateful. Go to one older thread about Erika and you'll see the same hate. The main theme of this forum is hate, this forum is not about porn, it's not about tgirl porn, or anything remotely like that, the main talk on this forum is hate and Woody's words are not much different than the other hateful posts.
PS-Also there seems to be a CD/TV verses TS resentment to each other, just another form of hate in my opinion.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Odd though that this comes from someone who purports to be a good friend of TV Kim. Very odd to see hate from him (or her).
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Prospero
Odd though that this comes from someone who purports to be a good friend of TV Kim. Very odd to see hate from him (or her).
So do you think his dislike for Woodywoodcrack is not warranted? You think what Woodywoodhead said was not out of line? You sound like you are supporting what woodwhateversack said, you must hate transsexuals too.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AmyDaly
So do you think his dislike for Woodywoodcrack is not warranted? You think what Woodywoodhead said was not out of line? You sound like you are supporting what woodwhateversack said, you must hate transsexuals too.
Are you new to reading? Where on Earth, from any of Prospero's posts, would you get those crazy ideas?
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dgs925
Are you new to reading? Where on Earth, from any of Prospero's posts, would you get those crazy ideas?
Yeah I missed that also, Amy? I think you mis-read to whom he was referring.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Amy... how on earth do you get that from my posts? I hate haters and I love TS girls. I think you have seriously misread my post.
I was expressing bemusement that this nutjob Woody is posting this diatribe of hate and stupidity when elsewhere he is full of praise for Kim TV. He is so wrong its unbelievable what he posted.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dgs925
Are you new to reading? Where on Earth, from any of Prospero's posts, would you get those crazy ideas?
Now tell me why I would be new to reading? Are you new to understanding english? This person is mad that seanchai made his post.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Prospero
Isn't it possible that woodywoodsac and Kim are one and the same person?
Doubt it. I've never seen her 'attack' just anyone randomly... At least not like the 'attacks' I've seen against her.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AmyDaly
It gets old seeing these people invade threads and spread their hate. Whats the point of trying to market "kim" to a bunch of people who aren't here for that shit anyways.
The hostility and hate directed towards her on HA is gross. But if you look at her dedication thread, she has a lot more fans, and followers than most would have expected. Besides the very first line when you come to this website reads: Free Transsexual, Tranny, Shemales, Tgirls and TS/TV Forum and Blog. That includes her, and seems to welcome people who are into girls like her.
We can't fight prejudice with more prejudice. Instead let's educate those who we feel can benefit from it.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AmyDaly
Now tell me why I would be new to reading? Are you new to understanding english? This person is mad that seanchai made his post.
I guess I am new to understanding English. I don't quite understand your post. Who is mad? I think woodywoodsac is poisonous but mad? Probably not, sadly.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
If you people support what woodywoodsac said, just come out and say it. Stop beating around the bush.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AmyDaly
If you people support what woodywoodsac said, just come out and say it. Stop beating around the bush.
I would support him if his name was Woodyywoodpecker.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AmyDaly
If you people support what woodywoodsac said, just come out and say it. Stop beating around the bush.
Seriously, Amy, read through this whole post. Absolutely nobody has agreed with woodnuts, everybody thinks he's a troll.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mayrah
This board could really use a new subforum for education, too many clueless people on here and newbs with their am i gay shit.
I agree. I think there should be a FAQs section for noobs...
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Yvonne183
I would support him if his name was Woodyywoodpecker.
I think Woody Woodpeckerbreath suits him more...
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
For the record... woody has met me ONCE and because I refuse to meet him again, he has gone on a mission to slag off anyone who is TG, TS, TV CD.
You can see him in my photo-sets on this site so I dont really see how it can be me.
I'm not THAT good at photoshop!
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kayden Harley
Doubt it. I've never seen her 'attack' just anyone randomly... At least not like the 'attacks' I've seen against her.
The hostility and hate directed towards her on HA is gross. But if you look at her dedication thread, she has a lot more fans, and followers than most would have expected. Besides the very first line when you come to this website reads: Free Transsexual, Tranny, Shemales, Tgirls and TS/TV Forum and Blog. That includes her, and seems to welcome people who are into girls like her.
We can't fight prejudice with more prejudice. Instead let's educate those who we feel can benefit from it.
I agree with you Kayden. They can throw whatever they like at me. I'm not bothered. I have my supporters and I'm here for them.
After reading the kellydreamhouse post it seems there are bigger issues now.
Thanks for your input anyway!
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Prospero
Odd though that this comes from someone who purports to be a good friend of TV Kim. Very odd to see hate from him (or her).
As I say... I met woody once and refuse to see him again. Make from that what you will.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AmyDaly
If you people support what woodywoodsac said, just come out and say it. Stop beating around the bush.
Has Amy finally lost the plot? lol ...
I don't think anyone has even hinted at support for Woody's views yet :/
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Yvonne183
I don't think what Woody says has anything to do with ignorance or a lack of knowledge. What I feel is going on here is exactly what goes on all over this frekin' forum,,,,, HATE. People on this forum have a lot of hate inside themselves and they are free to use it anytime in their posts cause this forum is very lightly moderated. I think Woody's choice of words are just hate words, something to get back at people he doesn't like, to upset people,, especially the tgirls.
Go to the thread titled "Why are tgirls so sexy" and see how some of those posts are hateful. Go to one older thread about Erika and you'll see the same hate. The main theme of this forum is hate, this forum is not about porn, it's not about tgirl porn, or anything remotely like that, the main talk on this forum is hate and Woody's words are not much different than the other hateful posts.
PS-Also there seems to be a CD/TV verses TS resentment to each other, just another form of hate in my opinion.
:iagree: You're absolutely right, Yvonne. Sometimes you'd think that HA stands for Hate Angels. Call me naive if you like, but I genuinely find it amazing that a forum which should be celebrating the glories and yes, the undoubted achievements, of so many tgirls, seems to be all about denigration instead.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AmyDaly
If you people support what woodywoodsac said, just come out and say it. Stop beating around the bush.
I suspect the divine Ms D is using a sadly underused concept on HA.
It's called irony, girls and boys. Lighten up.
Oh, and just in case of any ambiguity, this isn't in support of Woody.
He's a bigoted, ignorant knob.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
robertlouis
:iagree: You're absolutely right, Yvonne. Sometimes you'd think that HA stands for Hate Angels. Call me naive if you like, but I genuinely find it amazing that a forum which should be celebrating the glories and yes, the undoubted achievements, of so many tgirls, seems to be all about denigration instead.
Ive been thinking that for a while aswell. :wiggle:
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
I think Woody is Seanchai's sockpuppet. He exists so that Steven can utilize his white knight complex and save all TS from the perils of society and the industry. You are NO messiah, sir, and certainly no protector. Most of our issues were either caused or perpetuated by you. You are a fox in the hen house and this is an exercise intended to up your political cred, which should be difficult, considering that you didn't start with any.
Activism is the territory of all of the girls who suffer due to injustice, not the people who cause it. You sound like Glen Beck trying to steal the Tea Party right now, and frankly, if you thought I wouldn't call you on it, then you have more problems than you even know.
~BB~
PS: Woody's even part right: there are plenty of 'girls' who 'transition' for the money and the straight men. Certainly, it's not all of them who do, but we'd be remiss not to discuss those who transition but are not really TS.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dgs925
Seriously, Amy, read through this whole post. Absolutely nobody has agreed with woodnuts, everybody thinks he's a troll.
I just misunderstood the post that I quoted. Woodsacface is not trolling, I am pretty sure he is serious when he posts though.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BellaBellucci
I think Woody is Seanchai's sockpuppet. He exists so that Steven can utilize his white knight complex and save all TS from the perils of society and the industry.
Jesus Christ are you serious?
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AmyDaly
Jesus Christ are you serious?
I'm half-serious. I'm just trying to illustrate that it's odd that a man who shoots amateur TV's and markets them right along TS's as if they're the same thing is now here touting the differences between the two.
Getting called out on hypocrisy is a bitch. That's why I always adhere to my principals and never waiver from them.
~BB~
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BellaBellucci
I...who shoots amateur TV's and markets them right along TS's as if they're the same thing is now here touting the differences between the two.
a) point out where I market a TV as a TS please?
b) where I a "touting" the differences?
Fuckwit - would be the right term for you.
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
seanchai
a) point out where I market a TV as a TS please?
b) where I a "touting" the differences?
Fuckwit - would be the right term for you.
a) shemaleyum.com AKA 'The premiere megasite for men in dresses, and a few TS's.'
b) essentially you've argued that you can't see a chromosome, which is an argument utilized by many transwomen (myself included) to lessen the perception that they are are not women. Transvestites can't utilize this argument since they're literally men in dresses. Chromosomes are the least of their problems. yet you put them on Shemaleyum with transitioned women and imply that they're the same. Just because you haven't come right out and said it, that doesn't mean we can't draw a legitimate conclusion from your actions. :?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
seanchai
Not XX and not XY one in 1,666 births
Klinefelter (XXY) one in 1,000 births
Androgen insensitivity syndrome one in 13,000 births
Partial androgen insensitivity syndrome one in 130,000 births
Classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia one in 13,000 births
Late onset adrenal hyperplasia one in 66 individuals
Vaginal agenesis one in 6,000 births
Ovotestes one in 83,000 births
Idiopathic (no discernable medical cause) one in 110,000 births
Iatrogenic (caused by medical treatment, for instance progestin administered to pregnant mother) no estimate
5 alpha reductase deficiency no estimate
Mixed gonadal dysgenesis no estimate
Complete gonadal dysgenesis one in 150,000 births
Hypospadias (urethral opening in perineum or along penile shaft) one in 2,000 births
Hypospadias (urethral opening between corona and tip of glans penis) one in 770 births
Total number of people whose bodies differ from standard male or female one in 100 births
Total number of people receiving surgery to “normalize” genital appearance one or two in 1,000 births
http://www.isna.org/faq/frequency
(just one little example of why people are "different" from the norm)
~BB~
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
I think hate from either side is wrong - CD/TV/TS
However there is a lot of hate from all sides...
However I can't believe what Woody wrote...
Have you ever actually met or encountered a ts woman besides a cd?
You can't go off your experiences offline either - I mean actually meet spent sometime got to know them?
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Oh Bella shemale is a porn term it's the fastest thing someone into ts google...
Shemale-club uses shemale too and advocates for us
So what is the difference?
This is you trying to get a rise out of Steven and Amy
-
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KellyShore
Oh Bella shemale is a porn term it's the fastest thing someone into ts google...
Wrong. According to my site statistics, most people find my sites by googling 'Bella Bellucci' as opposted to 'TS Bella Bellucci' or 'Shemale Bella Bellucci.' I made that so intentionally by marketing accordingly and never using those terms on my sites. You know something? It hasn't hurt my business and I argue that it wouldn't hurt the megasites to be social leaders and do the same thing. Furthermore, the person who most prominently helped coin and perpetuate the term is your buddy Steven.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KellyShore
Shemale-club uses shemale too and advocates for us
So what is the difference?
Who's us? Transwomen or TV's? Because I don't see any TV's on SMC.
~BB~