http://mrbesilly.typepad.com/photos/...arah_palin.jpg
I knew she could handle something big & black in her hands............
Printable View
http://mrbesilly.typepad.com/photos/...arah_palin.jpg
I knew she could handle something big & black in her hands............
I'm scared of that.
great photoshop
What I want to know is where the hell are all of the beauty pagent pictures of her. She supposedly won some minor pagent some years back.
Funny although proven fake by Snopes.
Here's some hot tranny action though...
I don't believe this is a pageant shot, but this is Palin from back in the day:Quote:
Originally Posted by Paladin
LOL..... I CAN'T STAND HER! WHAT SHE SHOULD BE DOING IS DROPPING OUT THE RACE , AND TAKING THE TIME TO RAISE HER CHILDREN , WHO ARE IN MUCH MORE NEED . INSTEAD OF PLAYING VP. I CANNOT UNDERSTAND HOW A MOTHER WHO IS RUNNING FOR A TIME CONSUMING JOB/POSITION , CAN IN SOME WAYS NEGLECT THE FACT THAT SHE HAS A CHILD WHO HAS DOWN SYNDROME,,AND A DAUGHTER WHO IS UNDERAGE AND PREGNANT , AND SO FORTH.....IT SOUNDS TO ME LIKE HER PLATE IS MORE THAN FULL TO BEGIN WITH. WHEN SHE SPEAKS YOU KNOW WHAT I HEAR...... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ylX_bianR0
Unless Mccain dies VP is supposed to be a do-nothing symbolic position most of the time.Quote:
Originally Posted by JANIRA
You remember all the things Gore did during Clinton's presidency? Oh wait...
TR was put in the whitehouse as McKinley's VP simply because the corrupt Republicans wanted the radical progressive where he wouldn't/couldn't do anything. It back fired because McKinley was killed, but until then even TR lamented about how bored and purposeless his new job was.
I don't like her either, but its a weak argument imo.
very scary
Okay... thank you... those are damn funny T-shirts...
Not sure I have the balls to wear them out myself... but very very funny.
Sean
wow you'd think sarah palin had a dick the way you fags obsess over her. More shemales plz, move this topic to politics (zzzz)
co-sign let her 10 minutes of fame fade away into the sunset and let her get back to what really matters like shooting animals from a helicopter.anyone american with a brain knows obama is exactly what you need to move forward period.Quote:
Originally Posted by JANIRA
Explain that theory to Dick :twisted: Cheney. And make sure that you are wearing a kevlar vest when you do.Quote:
Originally Posted by SarahG
Oh dear what a disgustingly sexist point of view. I personally think it's remarkable that a mother who hasn't been to harvard or Yale and isn't from some big political family or has had a military career can get to where she has. Her having all those children't shouldn't make her more qualified to be VP like some wimmin are saying but it shouldn't be counted against her either.And isn't her husband able to help her or don't you believe men can be as good at looking after children?Quote:
Originally Posted by JANIRA
I wonder if the same argument would be brought up if she wasn't a nasty anti woman , anti Gay republican? If the Dems use arguments like yours they will assist the Mcain campaign . Democrats...' the party that not only is the party of womens rights but dictates to women what rights they can have!'.
good point but the fact is everything outta her mouth has been proven to be lies plain and simple,the only reason palanwas picked was because mcain was getting his ass put on a platter by the obama campain,talk to me after the debate with bidon....macain cant even trust this nut job to answer questions cause there too busy trying to kleen up her messin back im wassilia...Quote:
Originally Posted by arnie666
so, this was a comprehensive poll you took then?Quote:
Originally Posted by lisaparadise
lol ya know its hard to take you serious with that avitar hahahaha nice one ,,,,,notttttttttttttQuote:
Originally Posted by tubgirl
wow talk about a bunch of people who are hypocrits
you claim that most people have hatred and discrimitive against but yet you act like children
BTW Palin is not Bush
Obumma is running a campaighn on Pure Hatred for Bush with no grounds for policies its Hatred on Bush/Women and using his race as a black man for a crutch
how dare any one of you try to claim Palin is something you "think" she is when you dont
isnt that the same thing u ask of anyone to think about yourselves?
you know its hard to take you serious with canada in your signature.Quote:
Originally Posted by lisaparadise
just asking a question....Quote:
Originally Posted by lisaparadise
oh thats hilarious EH lol nice comebackQuote:
Originally Posted by MrShow52
With his accuracy I wouldn't be worried :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by kimjongil
So basically you're saying that Palin would be the real President with McCain as a figurehead like what we have now with Bush-Cheney?
Not sure I agree.
If a republican had said it, people would be throwing a shit-fit over it.Quote:
Originally Posted by arnie666
I can, barely, see the argument in favor of this perception when we're dealing with getting preg while in a policymaking position. With a preg a lot of stuff can effect a girl's job performance, because it is such a heavy duty thing to go through, and there can be quite a bit of healing time after the birth especially depending on the complications involved.
But it's a weak argument, and we've never actually required or forced a president to step down due to health issues* and I don't see how that would change just because a preg is involved. There are some interesting stories out there about Jackson being held down on white house tables so that bullets from duels could be extracted. In one case he kept the bullet after the fact knowing he was set to meet with the guy he had faced years back at a state dinner, walked over during the dinner- handed the guy the bullet and said "this once belonged to you" (paraphrasing- not a direct quote) and returned it. If it had been me I would have reused it and shot Jackson again...
But then again she wasn't talking about potential complications from preg after being knocked up, the rant was about her having kids already- and that argument just doesn't fly. BTW did you notice at the RNC that Mrs. McCain was holding one of Palin's kids in some of the shots? That wasn't coincidental, the RNC was basically trying to show that raising kids wasn't gonna be a problem.
I think raising kids already is a prob in this family IF it ends up that the one preg daughter was coerced into keeping the child, then arranged in a shotgun wedding. Given that, if that's how it is, living in a whitehouse full of servants isn't exactly a step down for their quality of life (its already fubar IF the kids are being forced to handle reproductive rights or relationships to cater to political agendas).
*I think with FDR, the public wouldn't have elected him if the extent of his polio problems were known. Same could possible be said about Reagan w/ Alzheimers (yes, he showed signs of it that far back in his life).
oh my god you must be a typical american white boy from alabama ,lol what exactly do you know about palan that the rest of us dont?not much seeing as her own party doesnt want her ansering any questions that about says it all now doesnt it?im thinkin you need to stick to the truth and watch and listen alittle more carefully to the issues at hand,do you know any american making under 300 thousand a year who doesnt like bush?i didnt think so....your voting for an idiot who thinks telling people lies is just fine aka his smear campain against barack telling americans obama want to teach sex ed to kindergarden kids what a fuckin piece of work,,,so what if macain is a so called war hero guess what he was in a war his fellow american republicans put him in.and i took jfk his life getting his sorry ass outta there.kinda funny macain has 10 lobbyist on his pay roll and you cant se the warning signs? gimmie a break and wake up.Quote:
Originally Posted by DX4LIFE
Wrong, 'nam was bipartisan as it gets. Both sides were Hawks during that stage of the Cold War, and it was JFK who caused the 'nam escalations to spiral out of control.Quote:
Originally Posted by lisaparadise
A few of JFK's advisers have even written books since, apologizing for 'nam, acknowledging the rule JFK had in causing it.
LBJ was a democrat, Nixon was a republican, but Nixon actually ran (and won) on the let's end the war campaign message of having a "secret plan to end the war" (that secret plan, if it existed at all, was to use a surge).
hahahaha very funny lolQuote:
Originally Posted by braveman
bullshit it was jfk who wanted them out not nixon dunno what your smokin but would ya share? lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SarahG
1) JFK used military aid to support the south vietnam anti-Communist factionsQuote:
Originally Posted by lisaparadise
2) JFK ok'd and aided the overthrow and then assassination of Diem
3) JFK more than doubled our military presence in 'nam (again this all before Tonkins)
4) JFK supported a new leader for South Vietnam who was blatantly bad in terms of human rights violations, worse than Diem ever was- prompting monks to burn themselves to death on the streets.
http://www.vietnampix.com/bilder/fire5e2.jpg
These actions:
1- Destabilized Vietnam
2- Committed the United States to the region
3- Caused chaos that showed it was all going out of control
With JFK's re-election coming up, these IMMEDIATE direct ramifications were important, and only then under the context of re-election concerns, did JFK consider his course of action were incorrect.
By then it was too little, too late.
It shows JFK was a hawk until it threatened his political career- and is no more or less different from what the United States foreign policy had been like since Wilson.
http://www.amazon.com/JFK-Vietnam-De.../dp/0446516783 still wanna share what your smokin lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SarahG
There are books that claim we never went to the moon, and that JFK was murdered by shape shifting lizard aliens... that doesn't mean its true.Quote:
Originally Posted by lisaparadise
Even if this book is factually correct, it still doesn't change that JFK was escalating vietnam until he realized it risked his re-election potential.
To put it using even fewer words: JFK was for escalation before he was against it.
I'm not saying he never changed his mind.
we can go back and forth on this all night but we will never change each others mind,i respect your opinion but well agree to dissagree and leave it at that.Quote:
Originally Posted by SarahG
None of yoru claims are facts and maybe when you learn to spell you can sense to form a valid arguementQuote:
Originally Posted by lisaparadise
Barack Obumma will lose u will come hear and bitch about it about how bad america is cause another liberal lost
but yet you;re still living here :-)
I will be pleased to here your complaints November 5th
I know Texas isn't known for its public schools, but you realize how many English and grammar errors you made in that response to hers? :PQuote:
Originally Posted by DX4LIFE
You didn't even have to mention "here your complaints", SarahG. Heh. I love freedom of speech, it gives those loud mouth conservatives all the rope they need to hang themselves.Quote:
Originally Posted by SarahG
:lol:
I missed more than that if you're paying attention ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by hondarobot
Thanks kimjong(mentally)il - hey i guess he really is mentally il now :PQuote:
Originally Posted by kimjongil
I know a lot of people here vote Democrat because of transgendered rights issues, but do you really think Obama is going to support those issues any more than a Republican candidate? I seriously doubt that Obama loves us or want's to be associated with us anymore than McCain does. If I'm right then what other reasons do transgendered, and transgendered supporters have to vote for Obama? Just because they say they like you and support you to your face doesn't mean they do the same when your back is turned.
Obama clearly doesn't care about the issue- like (imho) most of America. For most people, unless you're lgbt or are close to someone who is, it really isn't something that is thought about in day to day American life, especially when there are issues almost everyone can relate to (like the economy).Quote:
Originally Posted by msbhaven
The difference is that, while one side doesn't seem to give a shit- the other side absolutely cares. Running against lgbt rights has been a cornerstone of the Republican party for years. It was the biggest issue in 2004, it was how Bush got re-elected, and it probably had a role of some kind in choosing Palin for VP.
THANKFULLY, so far, it has been mostly a footnote in this election.
But why Obama? Well, I am not a big fan of the guy, he doesn't get me excited, I don't think he's particularly talented BUT if the choice is voting for someone who I know is inclined to try to reverse lgbt rights, and someone who is going to be more inclined to keep things as they are- the 2nd choice is the superior choice.
McCain is a concern for me not because of his personal views on lgbt issues so much as my fears regarding his VP pick. My prediction is that if McCain wins, Palin will run in 2012, she'll win, and she'll serve two terms (meaning 12 more years of this bullshit). Why else would McCain be allowing so much of this election to be Palin-mania? Why else would he be going around the country having HER do most the talking? He's parading her around knowing that she will be his successor, and that is what he wants.
She'll prolly run as #1 in the next election no matter what happens, but if McCain loses that's more time for her credibility to falter.
Basically voting for Obama is damage control.
The saving grace could be if the economy tanks, maybe, just maybe, that would make America reluctant to have these guys in office for another 12 years. But I kinda doubt it, this "popularity contest" has had nill to do with the real issues, no one is talking with substance, and no body seems to give two shits if any of the candidates know what they're talking about.
SaraG,
I totally get what you are saying and I can totally respect it. Your concerns are almost a mirror image of how I feel. While I don't like that the Repubs are antigay, antitrans, antidrug, antiporn, etc. I like it even less that the dems are for socialized medicine, tighter gun control, more taxes, more government controls on the people. What's more the islamic radical movements in the world frighten me a great deal, and I don't believe Obama is as capable of handling that problem as McCain. Also I know that many Dems are also antigay, antiporn, antitrans, antidrug, etc. Maybe they don't make an issue out of it like the Repubs do but I don't believe Dems are any more of a friend to us then Repubs are.
So....if Dems aren't going to make it easier for me to be a trans or trans lover, or pot smoker, or porn watcher, then why the F would I vote for them? Because I sure don't like their stance on all of the other important issues like defense, medical care, taxes, and limited government.
its not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country,,,,,you want 4 more years of the same go for it but all americans know this can not happen now can it,nobody gives a rats ass about your being a translover or a trans or your porn this is about a nation that lost all respect from other countries about an economy that cant find its way outta the black hole and john has the nerve to say in a speech last night that theres nothing fundamentally wrong with the economy lol get fucking real,this coming from an idiot who doesnt even know how many houses he owns wtf? so let me put it this way either 50per cent of americans are completely stupid or more like 50 per cent are likely racist fucks cause theres no freakion way this political race should be even close plain and simple.....Quote:
Originally Posted by msbhaven