WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
woodywoodsac
Obviously you didnt study Biology either:
ALL TS's start out as a MAN, and come out with statements like "I have been born into the wrong body". blah blah.
We all know TS's are only in it for the attention they never got as a man.
At least TV's and CD's are still men and can admit to that fact.
Here is a simple analogy even YOU can understand:
Hey, lets paint this pig black and white: bingo, its now a cow.
WRONG: its still a pig... with paint on it.
There is MAN and WOMAN. Get it?
There is NOTHING in between. (apart from hermaphodites, which are a rare genetic freak of nature, as are conjoined twins etc.
So which part dont you understand? There is MAN and WOMAN.
A TS is simply a man that has taken drugs to grow breasts and grown his hair long.
Which part dont you understand? There is MAN and WOMAN.
THE END
I thought I'd re-post this from another thread but this winnit, Woodynutsac has made an excellent example of ignorance that should be made sticky for posterity.
I think the Woodsac's clear analogy (is he saying TS's are pigs or cows?) and explanation that all TS's are men who just "take drugs and grow their hair long for attention", is probably indictive of a lot of poorly educated, ill-informed, bigoted, sad little men out there who refuse to accept any other biological, psychological or other reasons for transgenderism, in all it's forms.
I believe it's also attitudes like his, which lead to further hate crimes or the fact that a 10 yr transgender who returned to school this week in the UK as a girl, was ridiculed not by other children but by adults in the area:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...want-girl.html
(Woody a 65+ yr old guy, was making fun out of a 10yr old??)
So girls, guys and everyone else. Let this serve as a clear example of how many ignorant individuals are out there and see what can be done, to maybe try and educate them a bit. I think it's sad that Kim, who is a TV and happy to be one, can't educate her tool on different types of transgenders (maybe she's realized it's a loss cause on him - after all, she only needs his arm not his brain). Personally, I'd rather drive down and kick him in his Woodwoodsac.
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
seanchai
Personally, I'd rather drive down and kick him in his Woodwoodsac.
Take me! I will hold him down so you can give them a good stomping on!!
Fookin ass-wipe!
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
This board could really use a new subforum for education, too many clueless people on here and newbs with their am i gay shit.
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Not XX and not XY one in 1,666 births
Klinefelter (XXY) one in 1,000 births
Androgen insensitivity syndrome one in 13,000 births
Partial androgen insensitivity syndrome one in 130,000 births
Classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia one in 13,000 births
Late onset adrenal hyperplasia one in 66 individuals
Vaginal agenesis one in 6,000 births
Ovotestes one in 83,000 births
Idiopathic (no discernable medical cause) one in 110,000 births
Iatrogenic (caused by medical treatment, for instance progestin administered to pregnant mother) no estimate
5 alpha reductase deficiency no estimate
Mixed gonadal dysgenesis no estimate
Complete gonadal dysgenesis one in 150,000 births
Hypospadias (urethral opening in perineum or along penile shaft) one in 2,000 births
Hypospadias (urethral opening between corona and tip of glans penis) one in 770 births
Total number of people whose bodies differ from standard male or female one in 100 births
Total number of people receiving surgery to “normalize” genital appearance one or two in 1,000 births
http://www.isna.org/faq/frequency
(just one little example of why people are "different" from the norm)
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
ugh really - how disgusting
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
wow. Was that in response to the comment I left on his thread about a 'manly ts' - it seems to have been deleted now... (I didn't know much moderating happened on this forum)
Those are some pretty horrible things he said. How insensitive do you have to be not to realise that comparing people to pigs or calling them 'freaks of nature' is going to upset them?!
What is he even doing on this forum if he's so ill-inclined towards transgenderism?
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Woodywoodsac and the rest of the Kim's band of merry men need to just get out. It gets old seeing these people invade threads and spread their hate. Whats the point of trying to market "kim" to a bunch of people who aren't here for that shit anyways.
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
Isn't it possible that woodywoodsac and Kim are one and the same person?
Whatever his post plumbed new levels of ignorance and prejudice.
Re: WoodNutSac "All TS's are Men in it for Attention"
I don't think what Woody says has anything to do with ignorance or a lack of knowledge. What I feel is going on here is exactly what goes on all over this frekin' forum,,,,, HATE. People on this forum have a lot of hate inside themselves and they are free to use it anytime in their posts cause this forum is very lightly moderated. I think Woody's choice of words are just hate words, something to get back at people he doesn't like, to upset people,, especially the tgirls.
Go to the thread titled "Why are tgirls so sexy" and see how some of those posts are hateful. Go to one older thread about Erika and you'll see the same hate. The main theme of this forum is hate, this forum is not about porn, it's not about tgirl porn, or anything remotely like that, the main talk on this forum is hate and Woody's words are not much different than the other hateful posts.
PS-Also there seems to be a CD/TV verses TS resentment to each other, just another form of hate in my opinion.