Originally Posted by
broncofan
It's not just diminishing returns but if you are reporting a protest that has been going on for 75 to 80 weeks, you run out of things to write about it. Yes there have been fatalities, but some were from automobiles, and there was also a heart attack. Often foreign protests don't get a lot of international coverage unless the government is killing people or there's the potential for a coup. The police fighting the firebrigade is the exact flash point that generates coverage. The New York Times articles talked about how police should stop using tear gas canisters.
I guess my question is if you had to write the news article informing the public about them, what would it say? And if it is something that could have been said 10 or 20 weeks ago, what would be the purpose of the article?
When I go to the google news section and search the bbc articles in the last 10 months I found 14 or 15 articles about the yellow vests just on the first three pages. They're not pr people for the yellow vests. They're not their press agents. There's been a steady trickle, but not a broadcasting of their every thought.