Stavros
08-07-2015, 06:07 AM
The director Roland Emmerich has created a new version of Stonewall, the defining moment in the history of LGBT rights because after this incident in Greenwich Village a political movement emerged that has literally changed the law on sexual identity and behaviour across the world -if not all of it (yet).
The controversy surrounds the deletion of transgendered people from this version of the events that happened in New York in 1969, and is not to be confused with the 1995 film by Nigel Finch in which transgendered people are the ones who kick started the movement for LGBT rights. As this angry article on Emmerich's film puts it:
It would seem from the trailer that this new guy is even going to be the legend who decided “enough is enough” and threw the first brick. Clearly the Stonewall team came to the conclusion that they didn’t need real people to tell this story. No, they needed a cute blue-eyed hero in order to sell tickets. The outcome? A whitewashed film that sells itself with the spirit of the Sixties (revolution, a rock'n'roll soundtrack, vintage-y sepia filter) but pushes people of colour, lesbians and trans people out of their own history.
Someone on HA made a point in a thread I cannot recall that there was a riot in San Francisco led by our Queens a year before Stonewall, either way, if what is being said about this new Stonewall is true, it is a sad reflection of an enduring dismissal of transgendered people that continues long after it should have become redundant.
The link is to the article (which includes a trailer) and the IMDB link for the earlier film.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/film/stonewall/gay-rights-true-story-controversy/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114550/
The controversy surrounds the deletion of transgendered people from this version of the events that happened in New York in 1969, and is not to be confused with the 1995 film by Nigel Finch in which transgendered people are the ones who kick started the movement for LGBT rights. As this angry article on Emmerich's film puts it:
It would seem from the trailer that this new guy is even going to be the legend who decided “enough is enough” and threw the first brick. Clearly the Stonewall team came to the conclusion that they didn’t need real people to tell this story. No, they needed a cute blue-eyed hero in order to sell tickets. The outcome? A whitewashed film that sells itself with the spirit of the Sixties (revolution, a rock'n'roll soundtrack, vintage-y sepia filter) but pushes people of colour, lesbians and trans people out of their own history.
Someone on HA made a point in a thread I cannot recall that there was a riot in San Francisco led by our Queens a year before Stonewall, either way, if what is being said about this new Stonewall is true, it is a sad reflection of an enduring dismissal of transgendered people that continues long after it should have become redundant.
The link is to the article (which includes a trailer) and the IMDB link for the earlier film.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/film/stonewall/gay-rights-true-story-controversy/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114550/