Log in

View Full Version : Has your definition of beauty changed?



RallyCola
02-26-2015, 07:27 AM
for a while now, i've looked at the ggirl pic of the day thread and decided that more often than not, many ggirl porn starts have little appeal to me. so...my question to you is: do you think that your fondness of transwomen has altered the type of genetic girl you are attracted to?

Where at the onset (now 23 years ago), I think I was attracted to transwomen that resembled the ggirls I liked, now, I think I am largely only attracted to ggirls that have the physique and facial features concomitant with transition. In fact, the sheer # of women in the halls or on the street that make me turn my head has been steadily decreasing.

do any of you concur?

CoolAwesomeBXDude
02-26-2015, 08:02 AM
i say yes to a certain extent. before i started seeing ts' i was attracted to all types of ggs. now what attracts me is thick ggs but its happening less n less

as for ts the opposite happened. 4 years ago u would never see me even trying to get with a ts... now ts' attract me a whole lot -thick, skinny, white black latino,tall, short w.e

Tapatio
02-26-2015, 09:40 AM
Interesting.

Honestly though, the only difference I see in what attracts me now is that I'm a more accepting of women who don't have vaginas.

TS or GG, I prefer ectomorphs. Big asses, wide hips, etc. really don't do anything for me, though I find I do prefer larger breasts on TS than I'd necessarily want on GGs. It's probably some residual hangup or something- a "flat" TS kind of ruins it for me.

I like lean women, regardless the genitals.

blackchubby38
02-26-2015, 05:04 PM
Nope. I have always been attracted to different types of genetic girls. The same goes for transsexuals. There is also crossover between the two when it comes physiques and certain looks that both types of girls share.