Obama is smooth...

[buttslinger]

In Politics, blaming the other guy is key. How do you think Obama got elected?

[onmyknees]

Which party vetted Sarah Palin??


Not your party....lol. It was their surrogates in the press sending plane loads of reporters to Wasilla to comb through her old junior high year books, and every person she'd ever interacted with. I guess that's why they were too preoccupied to vet the other guy? Somethin' like that, I guess ! lmao

[trish]

Naw, that's not how the liberal press did it. Why go to all that trouble (you know asking her trick questions like, "What newspapers do you read?") when the communists could just spy on Palin from the shores of Russia with their binoculars. LMAO@OMK-loser.

[runningdownthatdream]

Not your party....lol. It was their surrogates in the press sending plane loads of reporters to Wasilla to comb through her old junior high year books, and every person she'd ever interacted with. I guess that's why they were too preoccupied to vet the other guy? Somethin' like that, I guess ! lmao

Hey you forgot to write 'lol'.....and while implicit in your gibberish you also forgot to mention 'Obama'. You're slipping...or maybe losing your mind? Did your left (or is that right) nut which got shaken loose from your HD still rolling around in your brain?

[Prospero]

Well thank goodness the media did a good job in exposing the ill-informed woman that Palin was. I guess it's not the job of the media to look under stones? And thank goodness also that they didn't bother with wasting time on the absurdities of the mythmaking birthers.

[onmyknees]

Hey you forgot to write 'lol'.....and while implicit in your gibberish you also forgot to mention 'Obama'. You're slipping...or maybe losing your mind? Did your left (or is that right) nut which got shaken loose from your HD still rolling around in your brain?


What the fuck is your point? If it's an attempt at insult....you failed. I'm more amused than insulted. You're going to have to bring more than that. If your attempt was to insinuate anything I stated was inaccurate, you shouldn't be so obtuse....out with it. If your intent was to convey you're an Obama ass kisser and become prickly when anyone voices a contrary opinion, or evidence ... I think we already knew that, no newsflash there. You're a card carrying member of the 99.9 %ers in here........so what exactly was your point? Inane and lame are the words that come to mind......

[onmyknees]

Well thank goodness the media did a good job in exposing the ill-informed woman that Palin was. I guess it's not the job of the media to look under stones? And thank goodness also that they didn't bother with wasting time on the absurdities of the mythmaking birthers.


The question was regarding vetting. You missed the point entirely. Of course the presses job is to look under rocks, as you put it. I'm not so sure it's their job to question the DNA of a disabled child, but maybe they turn over more rocks in the UK. The point I was trying to make was that some got vetted, some got anointed. The vetting is now underway, albeit 4 years late. Perhaps that's why Bill Clinton referred to him as an "Amateur" which coincidently is the name of a New York Times Best seller. Is it on your reading list?


I hope I've clarified sufficiently.

[trish]

If any media was in the business of anointing political leaders as if they were spiritual guides and demonizing others as if they were...well demons, it's FOX. Fair and balanced news my ass. Fair and balanced news networks don't pay for, produce and run political adds.












Oh yeah, LMAO.

[onmyknees]

[QUOTE=trish;1154184]If any media was in the business of anointing political leaders as if they were spiritual guides and demonizing others as if they were...well demons, it's FOX. Fair and balanced news my ass. Fair and balanced news networks don't pay for, produce and run political adds.





I won't defend that one show, that one instance....unlike you of course who will on the other hand defend all the bilge on MSNBC night after night where hosts make political ads, then play their own ads on their shows as they did in Wisconsin....or the defamation suit pending against one of the hosts. You're not a dumb person, unlike some on here so If you can't see media bias, you're either ignorant, ambivalent, or blinded by your ideology....there's simply no other explanation. And by all means, continue to believe what you wanna believe, and don't allow anyone to dislodge your from your fantasies. BTW...are you still having those recurring delusions about the impact and veracity of OWS ? Now that's funny !

[trish]

Wrong again. I don't even watch msnbc. Have you ever seen a post by me defending msnbc? Link it loser.

[Token Williams-Black]

Wasn't this thread about Obama singing?

[trish]

But that's just typical of you OMK. You got me stereotyped and you're convinced that I do all the things your ideology tells you people who fit into my stereotype do...in spite of the fact you never met me, never saw me post a defense of msnbc, and discussed this very issue twice before when you were also unable to provide evidence. Are that forgetful? That inobservant? That enthralled by ideology? Or have you just decided that lying is okay to make your point on a porn forum? What a fucking loser!

[buttslinger]

FDR: I Welcome Their Hatred - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RP_8bwhNVw&feature=related)

[Silcc69]

Wasn't this thread about Obama singing?

Well we have quite a few right wing nut jobs on here so you can pretty much figure out why it went to hell.

[Ben]

I agree w/ this kid. Obama is making kids gay -- ha ha ha! That's why Obama ran for President. To make kids gay... ha ha ha!
Quoting the YoungTurks: 'A 14-year-old conservative radio host from West Virginia recently claimed that President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden were "making kids gay" by supporting LGBT rights.'
Anyway, most teenagers don't have their political philosophy fully formed. I was quite right wing as a teen. And then I saw the leftist light.... However, I do support gun rights. Which so-called liberals/leftists are staunchly opposed to.
Part of the problem with aligning oneself with a political affiliation, as it were, is that groupthink takes over. Ya know, these are the positions you're supposed to have. I'm so-called leftist. But, well, I waver on the death penalty. Again, I support gun rights. However, I'm for a woman's right to choose etc.

Obama Is 'Making Kids Gay' Says 14-Year-Old Conservative Talk Show Host - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxeFVWqX4NM)

[Ben]

If we're going to live in a pure/libertarian market system, well, we have to privatize the fire department. Well, it could work. Hopefully the Koch brothers and Bill Gates invest heavily in firefighting.
Wildfires could be great for the profit system...
Well, the GNP would go up. Which is always a positive. As it goes up when there are car accidents -- :)
Economic growth and GNP growth are always positive. No matter how we get there -- ;)

Conservatives Blame Obama For Colorado Wildfires - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zNjKWw6z64&feature=plcp)

Bill McKibben - Downsides to Economic Growth - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5YVXnnfS28)

[slammer]

Obama sucks big balls one hit wonder...........

[Jericho]

Obama is making kids gay

Obamagayt, innit! :shrug

[Prospero]

Obama singing


Obama! A Modern U.S. President (musical spoof) - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y54FRMedT_s)

[Ben]

Obama is... right:

Obama: If you've been successful you didn't get there on your own - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=192oEC5TX_Q)

[danthepoetman]

Obamagayt, innit! :shrug

That one makes my day...

[Ben]

Republicans step up and question Obama's right to kill American citizens abroad.... Romney, of course, would continue this policy.
Politics is about power. And what do you want when you have power? Well, more power. It's very addictive and therefore very dangerous.
I mean, true conservatives are steadfastly against concentrated power. Conservatives should be outraged that the executive branch has assumed so much power.
Conservatives, of course, believe in morality. But the problem with morality: everyone... I mean, everyone... has their own internal morality. That's why so-called change is difficult. I mean, Obama, Bush and Cheney all believe(d) they were doing the right thing. Obama believes he's acting in a moral fashion.
Again, Cheney and Bush did the same thing with respect to the concentration of executive power -- or just pure power. But Obama has further concentrated executive power. Which, again, should make every true conservative shudder:

Obama's 'License To Kill' Being Questioned By Congress - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkEZfkOvSew&feature=plcp)

Chomsky on Liberal Disillusionment with Obama - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6Jbnq5V_1s)

[Ben]

Obama vs Free Speech

Noam Chomsky - Obama vs Free Speech - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNYsJXVi4uw)

[Merkurie]

If Obama's concentration of executive power bothers any conservatives it is only because he is not a republican.

The last 4 years have been just like the previous 4 years with a different cast.

[fred41]

Obama vs Free Speech

Noam Chomsky - Obama vs Free Speech - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNYsJXVi4uw)


I'm a little disappointed...Before I clicked on this I was hoping for something better.

[Ben]

Chuck should stick to martial arts.... I mean, one can disagree with Obama about policy etc. But this is too much.

Chuck Norris WARNING America "1000 years of Darkness" if Obama Wins - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFxKD0f1VfY)

[onmyknees]

If Obama's concentration of executive power bothers any conservatives it is only because he is not a republican.

The last 4 years have been just like the previous 4 years with a different cast.

Nice try. He gets far more grief from his left flank on these issues....His concentration of power is about 75th on a list of things that bother most conservatives, although it does sound like it bothers you. All those executive orders and czars, and medical boards got you down?

[Ben]

Chuck Norris Threatens “1000 Years Of Darkness” If Obama Wins: (http://www.prisonplanet.com/chuck-norris-threatens-1000-years-of-darkness-if-obama-wins.html)

http://www.prisonplanet.com/chuck-norris-threatens-1000-years-of-darkness-if-obama-wins.html


And the comment section is interesting/entertaining -- :)

[danthepoetman]

We now know for sure why Norris is known for his (acted) physical prowess, and not for his IQ… But then again, you sometimes have the feeling, listening to some people, that there’s a stupidity race and a big trophy at the end.