Log in

View Full Version : Republican Party Better if Ron Paul Left: Bill Kristol...



Ben
01-18-2012, 04:25 AM
Republican Party Better if Ron Paul Left: Bill Kristol - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aUI436aF5k)

Ben
01-18-2012, 04:27 AM
The Blog

Kristol: Let Ron Paul Go

By DANIEL HALPER (http://www.weeklystandard.com/author/daniel-halper)
This morning on C-SPAN, the boss said he thinks it would be good for the Republican party to part ways with Ron Paul. (Watch the video here (http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/PrimaryFie/start/2492/stop/2611).)

http://www.weeklystandard.com/sites/all/files/imagecache/teaser-large/images/teasers/495px-Ron_Paul_2007.jpg

“A lot of people when they criticize Ron Paul have to preface their criticism by saying, ‘you know, he’s good guy, he brings a lot to the debate,’” Bill Kristol said on C-SPAN (http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/PrimaryFie/start/2492/stop/2611). “I actually don’t buy that. I do not think he’s a particular good guy . . . I think it would be better for the Republican party, if he left the Republican party.”
The boss said the inclination to keep Paul a member of the party is wrong. “A lot of Republicans are spending a lot of time [thinking], ‘how do we keep Ron Paul under the tent? How do we make sure he doesn’t go third party?”
Kristol then drew a comparison to how Republicans made an effort to keep Pat Buchanan and his followers under a big tent—and reminded the C-SPAN audience that Buchanan probably ended up hurting Republicans’ efforts in 1992 and 1996.
“[Buchanan] left the party in 1999 and a lot of people, and I was one of them, said, goodbye and good riddance, you’re not in the mainstream of the Republican party, go run as some Reform party candidate . . . he did in 2000 and he didn’t get many votes and actually George W. Bush I think was helped—and the Republican party was helped—to be free of Buchanan’s extreme isolationism, protectionism, anti-Israel views, and the like. Ron Paul is a little different from Pat Buchanan—but he’s no better, in my view. And I actually think we’d benefit in the long run—but even in the short run . .

hippifried
01-18-2012, 10:48 AM
Why should anybody give a shit about Bill Kristol or anything he might say?

onmyknees
01-19-2012, 01:18 AM
Why should anybody give a shit about Bill Kristol or anything he might say?

I tend to agree. Bill Kristol is an establishment ass. There's some things not to like about Ron Paul, but he is an important part of the party. He brings in young vigorous voices and his libertarian views are critical to the long term growth of the party. If they could keep him from espousing some of his more loony views....I'd give him a prime time speech at the convention.

Ben
01-19-2012, 04:56 AM
Pat Buchanan on Ron Paul - 1/12/12 - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzHhLmeZ89c&feature=related)

Dino Velvet
01-19-2012, 05:19 AM
Pat Buchanan on Ron Paul - 1/12/12 - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzHhLmeZ89c&feature=related)

Thanks for the video, Ben.:cheers:

Ben
01-19-2012, 05:40 AM
Thanks for the video, Ben.:cheers:

You're welcome Dino -- :)
And this is why the likes of Kristol want Paul out of the Republican Party:

Ron Paul Booed For Mentioning Golden Rule Then Cheered - SC Debate 1-16-2012 - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltRTLNZmmfs)

Bahadir
02-20-2012, 02:27 AM
Rebuplican party better if there is not.