PDA

View Full Version : 1/4 of Bush's $15 Billion for AIDS Going to Christian Groups



chefmike
01-31-2006, 03:20 AM
A Quarter of Bush's $15 Billion for AIDS Going to Christian Groups...

Not that anyone who is aware of what this bunch of criminals is up to should be surprised...

Religious Groups Get Chunk of AIDS Money
By RITA BEAMISH, Associated Press Writer
Sun Jan 29, 6:31 PM ET

President Bush's $15 billion effort to fight AIDS has handed out nearly one-quarter of its grants to religious groups, and officials are aggressively pursuing new church partners that often emphasize disease prevention through abstinence and fidelity over condom use.

Award recipients include a Christian relief organization famous for its televised appeals to feed hungry children, a well-known Catholic charity and a group run by the son of evangelist Billy Graham, according to the State Department.

The outreach to nontraditional AIDS players comes in the midst of a debate over how best to prevent the spread of HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. The debate has activated groups on both ends of the political spectrum and created a vast competition for money.

Conservative Christian allies of the president are pressing the U.S. foreign aid agency to give fewer dollars to groups that distribute condoms or work with prostitutes. The Bush administration provided more than 560 million condoms abroad last year, compared with some 350 million in 2001.

Secular organizations in Africa are raising concerns that new money to groups without AIDS experience may dilute the impact of Bush's historic three-year-old program.

"We clearly recognize that it is very important to work with faith-based organizations," said Dan Mullins, deputy regional director for southern and western Africa for CARE, one of the best-known humanitarian organizations.

"But at the same time we don't want to fall into the trap of assuming faith-based groups are good at everything," Mullins said.

The administration is beginning a broad effort to attract newcomers and distribute money for AIDS prevention and care beyond the large nonprofit groups that traditionally have led the fight.

The New Partners Initiative reserves $200 million through the 2008 budget year for community and church groups with little or no background in government grants. Some may have health operations in Africa but no experience in HIV work. Others may be homegrown groups in Africa that have not previously sought U.S. support.

"The notion that because people have always received aid money that they'll get money needs to end," Deputy U.S. global AIDS coordinator Mark Dybul said in an interview with The Associated Press. "The only way to have sustainable programs is to have programs that are wholly owned in terms of management personnel at the local level."

Large nonprofit groups involved in health and development projects typically enlist local religious groups because of their deep community ties.

The goal now is to penetrate hard-to-reach corners of the target countries — 13 in Africa, and Haiti and Vietnam — and bring aboard community and faith groups that previously lacked expertise to win grants, Dybul said.

Religious organizations last year accounted for more than 23 percent of all groups that got HIV/AIDS grants, according to the State Department. Some 80 percent of all secular and religious grant recipients were based in the countries where the aid is targeted.

Among those winning grants were:

_Samaritan's Purse, which is run by Graham's son, Franklin. It says its mission is "meeting critical needs of victims of war, poverty, famine, disease and natural disaster while sharing the Good News of Jesus Christ."

_World Vision. The 56-year-old Christian organization is known for its TV appeals — some with celebrities such as game show host Alex Trebek — that asked people to support a Third World child.

_Catholic Relief Services. It was awarded $6.2 million to teach abstinence and fidelity in three countries; $335 million in a consortium providing anti-retroviral treatment; and $9 million to help orphans and children affected by HIV/AIDs. The group offers "complete and correct information about condoms" but will not promote, purchase or distribute them, said Carl Stecker, senior program director for HIV/AIDS.

_HOPE. The global relief organization founded by the International Churches of Christ recently brought comedian Chris Rock to South Africa for an AIDS prevention event. AIDS grants support HOPE in several countries.

_World Relief, founded by the National Association of Evangelicals. It won $9.7 million for abstinence work in four countries.

Most of the money in Bush's initiative goes to treatment programs, earning the administration praise for delivering lifesaving drugs and care to millions of HIV-infected patients.

For prevention, Bush embraces the "ABC" strategy: abstinence before marriage, being faithful to one partner, and condoms targeted for high-risk activity. The Republican-led Congress mandated that one-third of prevention money be reserved for abstinence and fidelity.

Condom promotion to anyone must include abstinence and fidelity messages, U.S. guidelines say, but those preaching abstinence do not have to provide condom education.

The abstinence emphasis, say some longtime AIDS volunteers, has led to a confusing message and added to the stigma of condom use in parts of Africa. Village volunteers in Swaziland maintain a supply of free condoms but say they have few takers.

"This drive for abstinence is putting a lot of pressure on girls to get married earlier," said Dr. Abeja Apunyo, the Uganda representative for Pathfinder International, a reproductive health nonprofit group based in Massachusetts.

"For years now we have been trying to tell our daughters that they should finish their education and train in a profession before they get married. Otherwise they have few options if they find themselves separated from their husbands for some reason," Apunyo said.

An AIDS-program pastor in Uganda explained his abstinence teaching to unmarried young people.

"Why give an alternative and have them take a risk?" asked the Rev. Sam Lawrence Ruteikara of the Anglican Church of Uganda, a U.S. grant recipient. "This person doesn't have a sexual partner, so why should I report too much, saying that in case you get a sexual partner, please use a condom. I am saying, please don't get a sexual partner — don't get involved because it is risky."

Secular activists say it is not realistic to expect all teenagers to abstain from sex and that teenagers also should be taught how to protect themselves.

U.S.-backed programs have spread abstinence and faithfulness education to more than 13 million people in Uganda, according to the State Department. Officials promote the nation as an "ABC" model, with its HIV infection rate down by more than half in a decade.

Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., said that on a tour of Uganda in January he saw pro-abstinence rallies and skits praising Bush, and U.S.-supported groups conducting house-to-house testing, care and counseling.

"The good news about the faith-based groups is not only the passion they bring to the work but it is the moral authority and the extended numbers of volunteers they can mobilize to get the word out," Smith said.

But Smith believes the administration is wrongly supporting some nonprofit groups. He and several other congressional conservatives wrote to Bush and the U.S. Agency for International Development, contending that several large grant recipients were pro-prostitution, pro-abortion or not committed enough to Bush's abstinence priorities.

The letters followed a briefing last year by Focus on the Family, run by Christian commentator and Bush ally James Dobson. The group's sexual health analyst, Linda Klepacki, said even some religious groups emphasize condoms over abstinence.

"We have to be careful that the president's original intent is being followed where A and B are the emphasized areas of the ABC methodology," she said.

Six congressional Democrats, in a letter last week to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, accused the conservatives of a distortion campaign that undermines a balanced approach to fighting AIDS.

"Their attack is based on a narrow, ideological viewpoint that condemns condoms and frames any attempt to reach out to high-risk populations as an endorsement of behaviors that these critics oppose," said Rep. Henry Waxman (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif.

USAID has declined to renew funding for two major AIDS-fighting consortiums, CORE and IMPACT, headed by organizations the conservatives targeted. Those two groups fund hundreds of community and religious-based organizations.

CORE, whose lead partner is CARE, is losing its central source of money, meaning its work survives only if it can win grants from individual USAID missions in target countries.

Family Health International, the lead organization of IMPACT, brought hundreds of local and religious groups into its $441 million project, but was told the administration wants new partners, said Sheila Mitchell, senior vice president of FHI's Institute for HIV/AIDS.

Dybul said the changes are in keeping with the shift to local groups. Any suggestion of political motivation is "inaccurate and offensive to people doing this work," he said. Millions of grant dollars still go to the groups that were criticized.

One grant was delayed when Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., last year complained about renewing $14 million to Population Services International, a leading nonprofit condom distributor.

The group's bingo-style games that teach Guatemalan prostitutes about safe sex misused funds "to exploit victims of the sex trade," Coburn said. Sen. Larry Craig (news, bio, voting record), R-Idaho, then wrote to praise PSI's work as "provably effective and efficient."

USAID divided the grant; condom distribution was separated into the smaller part so that religious groups could apply for the other part. PSI eventually won the larger grant. The second is outstanding.

Although administration critics frequently cite PSI as a group that fell from favor under the new initiative, "we have not been eviscerated," said Stewart Parkinson, a senior program analyst.

The group lost U.S. grants in Uganda and Tanzania but retained others. And Parkinson said he had no indication of political motivation.

chefmike
01-31-2006, 03:31 AM
Yet another repug thug, currently under investigation for other matters, is also up to his scrawny neck in these affairs...

Frist's Charity Under Scrutiny
WASHINGTON, Dec. 17, 2005


(AP) Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist's AIDS charity paid nearly a half-million dollars in consulting fees to members of his political inner circle, according to tax returns providing the first financial accounting of the presidential hopeful's nonprofit.

The returns for World of Hope Inc., obtained by The Associated Press, also show the charity raised the lion's share of its $4.4 million from just 18 sources. They gave between $97,950 and $267,735 each to help fund Frist's efforts to fight AIDS.

The tax forms, filed nine months after they were first due, do not identify the 18 major donors by name.

Frist's lawyer, Alex Vogel, said Friday that he would not give their names because tax law does not require their public disclosure. Frist's office provided a list of 96 donors who were supportive of the charity, but did not say how much each contributed.

The donors included several corporations with frequent business before Congress, such as insurer Blue Cross/Blue Shield, manufacturer 3M, drug maker Eli Lilly and the Goldman Sachs investment firm.

World of Hope gave $3 million it raised to charitable AIDS causes, such as Africare and evangelical Christian groups with ties to Republicans — Franklin Graham's Samaritan Purse and the Rev. Luis Cortes' Esperanza USA, for example.

The rest of the money went to overhead. That included $456,125 in consulting fees to two firms run by Frist's longtime political fundraiser, Linus Catignani. One is jointly run by Linda Bond, the wife of Sen. Christopher "Kit" Bond, R-Mo.

The charity also hired the law firm of Vogel's wife, Jill Holtzman Vogel, and Frist's Tennessee accountant, Deborah Kolarich.

Kolarich's name recently surfaced in an e-mail involving Frist's controversial sale of stock in his family founded health care company. That transaction is now under federal investigation.

Jill Holtzman Vogel, who is raising money for a run for the state Senate in Virginia in 2007, has received thousands in contributions this year from Catignani & Bond and from her husband, among numerous other sources, according to data released by the Virginia Public Access Project.

article here-

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/12/17/politics/main1134721.shtml

jt money
01-31-2006, 09:16 AM
So 3/4 of the money goes to non-Christian groups and politicians give money to their supporters iinstead of non supporters? What exactly is your issue?

chefmike
01-31-2006, 05:04 PM
So 3/4 of the money goes to non-Christian groups and politicians give money to their supporters iinstead of non supporters? What exactly is your issue?

...and officials are aggressively pursuing new church partners that often emphasize disease prevention through abstinence and fidelity over condom use.

Conservative Christian allies of the president are pressing the U.S. foreign aid agency to give fewer dollars to groups that distribute condoms or work with prostitutes.

Six congressional Democrats, in a letter last week to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, accused the conservatives of a distortion campaign that undermines a balanced approach to fighting AIDS.


Their attack is based on a narrow, ideological viewpoint that condemns condoms and frames any attempt to reach out to high-risk populations as an endorsement of behaviors that these critics oppose," said Rep. Henry Waxman (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif.
Of course a reich-winger like yourself wouldn't see any problem with these much needed funds being used to promote a christian right agenda. You apparently don't see the hypocrisy of a reich-wing repug like yourself belonging to a TS forum...

And as far as Frist and his corruption, he's yet another of the many corrupt repug thugs currently under indictment or investigation. If you want to make excuses for these repug thugs, go right ahead....just don't try selling that BS to me, hypocrite.

jt money
01-31-2006, 07:05 PM
The Bush administration provided more than 560 million condoms abroad last year, compared with some 350 million in 2001.

"The notion that because people have always received aid money that they'll get money needs to end," Deputy U.S. global AIDS coordinator Mark Dybul said in an interview with The Associated Press. "The only way to have sustainable programs is to have programs that are wholly owned in terms of management personnel at the local level."

Large nonprofit groups involved in health and development projects typically enlist local religious groups because of their deep community ties.

The goal now is to penetrate hard-to-reach corners of the target countries — 13 in Africa, and Haiti and Vietnam — and bring aboard community and faith groups that previously lacked expertise to win grants, Dybul said.

Religious organizations last year accounted for more than 23 percent of all groups that got HIV/AIDS grants, according to the State Department. Some 80 percent of all secular and religious grant recipients were based in the countries where the aid is targeted.

Most of the money in Bush's initiative goes to treatment programs, earning the administration praise for delivering lifesaving drugs and care to millions of HIV-infected patients.

For prevention, Bush embraces the "ABC" strategy: abstinence before marriage, being faithful to one partner, and condoms targeted for high-risk activity. The Republican-led Congress mandated that one-third of prevention money be reserved for abstinence and fidelity.

U.S.-backed programs have spread abstinence and faithfulness education to more than 13 million people in Uganda, according to the State Department. Officials promote the nation as an "ABC" model, with its HIV infection rate down by more than half in a decade.

Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., said that on a tour of Uganda in January he saw pro-abstinence rallies and skits praising Bush, and U.S.-supported groups conducting house-to-house testing, care and counseling.

"The good news about the faith-based groups is not only the passion they bring to the work but it is the moral authority and the extended numbers of volunteers they can mobilize to get the word out," Smith said.

The letters followed a briefing last year by Focus on the Family, run by Christian commentator and Bush ally James Dobson. The group's sexual health analyst, Linda Klepacki, said even some religious groups emphasize condoms over abstinence.

Dybul said the changes are in keeping with the shift to local groups. Any suggestion of political motivation is "inaccurate and offensive to people doing this work," he said. Millions of grant dollars still go to the groups that were criticized.

In your effort to criticize everything about the administration, you have provided us an article that proves they are doing a good job so Thank You.

As far as you other rhetorical rants about hypocrisy let me sum them all up for you: Blah, blah blah :roll:

chefmike
01-31-2006, 08:28 PM
The track Record of the Bush Administration on HIV/AIDS

http://www.actupny.org/reports/Bush_reportcard.pdf

Bush Shortchanges Global HIV/AIDS Fight Three Years In A Row. In 2005, Bush requested $2.8 billion for fighting global HIV/AIDS in 2005 and $2 billion in 2004, falling behind in his commitment to provide $15 billion over 5 years to fight HIV/AIDS worldwide. In his 2006 budget, Bush provided $3.2 billion. However, HIV/AIDS advocates say that the budget proposal "falls short" because Congress had authorized up to $3.8 billion for these programs. (CQ Today, 3/10/04, 2/2/04; Reuters, 1/22/05)

much more here (http://hannah.smith-family.com/archive/000971.html)

President Bush's Global AIDS initiative requires at least 33 percent of HIV prevention funds to be set aside for abstinence-only-until-marriage programs.

These programs don't work in the United States and won't work abroad.

Aside from the fact that they ignore the needs of many people (including all unmarried people), even those who are targeted aren't benefiting from these programs.

Eighty percent of women newly infected with HIV get the virus while married or in long-term relationships with primary partners. And in many countries, married adolescent girls have higher rates of HIV infection than their sexually active, unmarried peers.

Real HIV prevention depends on medically accurate sex education and fully realized reproductive rights, including access to condoms. Combined with treatment, this approach could save millions of lives.

http://www.plannedparenthood.org/pp2/portal/files/portal/webzine/globaldispatch/gd-051201-world-aids-day.xml

Science or Politics? George W. Bush and the Future of Sexuality Education in the United States
1/31/2006

The American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the National Institutes of Health, the Institute of Medicine, the Office of National AIDS Policy — all recently issued reports highlighting the scientific research in support of comprehensive sexuality education, education which includes information about both abstinence and contraception.

Congress, ignoring this science, allocated over $300 million since the fall of 1996 to fund unproven abstinence-only-until-marriage programs that exclude information about condoms and contraceptives for the prevention of teen pregnancy, HIV/AIDS, and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).

As Governor, George W. Bush championed abstinence-only-until-marriage programs in Texas. As a presidential candidate, Bush promised to increase federal funding for abstinence-only-until-marriage programs.

As President, is Bush poised to reject the scientific evidence on what really works with teens and sex?

Politics or Science?

more here (http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/publications/factsheet/fsbush.htm)

jt money
01-31-2006, 08:45 PM
http://www.avert.org/pepfar.htm

How many of PEPFAR's partners are faith-based?
In FY 2004, PEPFAR had 248 faith-based partners (16 primes and 232 subpartners), comprising just over 20% of all partners. PEPFAR views faith-based groups as priority local partners because many people participate in religious institutions, and they are important providers of health services in many focus countries. The proportion of faith-based partners is expected to rise.51

Has all the FY 2004 and FY 2005 money been spent?
There will often be some delay between the time when money is allocated to a prime partner and the time when that money is passed on to an in-country subpartner, such as a small community-based organisation. More time will then pass before the money is finally put to use. In some cases the whole process can take a considerable amount of time, so it is more than likely that some funds allocated by PEPFAR in FY 2004 and FY 2005 have still not trickled down to their intended beneficiaries.

Is the $15 billion all "new" money?
Prior to the start of PEPFAR the U.S. Government was already spending significant sums on combating HIV/AIDS outside of the U.S., with most of this expenditure being through bilateral agreements (agreements between the U.S. and one other country) and most of these agreements continued and became part of PEPFAR.

Of the total of $15 billion, $9 billion is extra funding, $5 billion is to continue these existing bilateral agreements (i.e. existing commitments) and $1 billion is money that is proposed should be provided to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.

Will $15 billion definitely be provided?
No, because although Congress has approved $15 billion, the actual amount to be provided each year will depend on how much Congress annually appropriates (approves for spending) for PEPFAR.