Stavros
07-28-2011, 03:37 PM
The article below may be 'over the top', it is after all the Daily Telegraph and the author is leading an excting life writing a biography of Pat Buchanan. The question for our American friends, has the term 'God Bless America' now indeed become a tagline rather than a heartfelt expression of gratitude and respect? Should it be representative of anything other than the religious populations of the USA?
I wasn't aware that Nixon was the first President to use it, but I do remember the furore in Berlin in 1979 when The Deer Hunter was shown at the Berlin Film Festival and the Russians (and others) objected to the 'russian roulette' sequence. The film ends with a rendition of 'God Bless America' and in context is a troubled form of relief and respect for the survivors.
I have met two Americans who claimed to be Communists, and they were some of the most extreme I have met -one also told me he was going back to DC to work on a campaign to elect a friend of his, a Republican. I tried to point out the contradiction but he shrugged his shoulders 'Its all politics'..! Extreme Americans can however be very scary.
For the records, God Save the Queen is used sparingly here, and thank -er, heavens? -for that. Enjoy. The link follows the text.
The attack on the 9/11 cross exposes the bizarre fundamentalism of American atheists
By Tim Stanley (http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/author/timstanley/) US politics (http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/category/us-politics/) Last updated: July 28th, 2011
[/URL]
(http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100098875/the-attack-on-the-911-cross-exposes-the-bizarre-fundamentalism-of-american-atheists/#disqus_thread)
http://1.2.3.11/bmi/blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/files/2011/07/wtccross2large.jpg
America’s culture war took an unpleasant turn this week. A group of atheists filed a suit (http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/07/27/atheist-group-files-lawsuit-against-display-wtc-cross-at-11-memorial/) to take down a cross erected at the Lower Manhattan memorial to the victims of 9/11. The cross was formed from two intersecting steel beams that were found intact in the rubble. Dave Silverman, head of the American Atheists, called the display a breach of the separation between church and state. He said that the cross “has become a Christian icon. It has been blessed by so-called holy men and presented as a reminder that their god, who couldn’t be bothered to stop the Muslim terrorists or prevent 3,000 people from being killed in his name, cared only enough to bestow upon us some rubble that resembles a cross.”
The story itself is a storm in a tea cup. The cross will probably stay because it has attained a cultural status beyond religious symbolism. To many viewers it is a physical reminder of the devastation and a metaphor for the resurrection of New York as a city. What is remarkable is where Silverman’s American Atheists have chosen to make their big stand. Picking on a memorial to the victims of 9/11 exposes the profound lack of sensitivity of the New Atheism and its obsessive, socially awkward edge. Some atheist activists suggested that the cross could stay if it were accompanied by symbols from other religions. They miss the point that the cross was only erected because it was found at Ground Zero. Presumably, if a fax machine had been discovered melted into the shape of Ganesh then that would have gone display, too. But that didn’t happen and it’s extraordinary, given its tragic origins, that the American Atheists can’t tolerate this modest statement. What will they protest about next? The crosses over the graves at Arlington Cemetery?
The fact is that the New Atheists aren’t interested in either pluralism or being left alone. They are iconoclasts and they enjoy breaking things. Take the case of the Mojave Memorial Cross - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Mojave_Memorial_Cross_1.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Mojave_Memorial_Cross_1.jpg/220px-Mojave_Memorial_Cross_1.jpg"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/2/23/Mojave_Memorial_Cross_1.jpg/220px-Mojave_Memorial_Cross_1.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojave_Memorial_Cross), erected in 1934 in memory of Americans killed in war. It was a beautiful, simple white cross that stood above the rocky desert and gave comfort to millions who saw it. The problem for those who cared: it was planted on public land. For years it was subject to vandalism and law suits, until the Supreme Court ruled that it could stay after the earth it stood on was transferred to a Veterans group. In May 2010, it went missing – stolen by a protestor. Again, it’s important to stress that the Mojave Cross had never been a purely Christian monument. Like the 9/11 cross, it used a universal symbol of death and rebirth to celebrate the sacrifices of millions of America’s soldiers. Whatever lunatic stole it, it was a truly sociopathic act.
What the New Atheists don’t get is that religion is functional: people engage with it in a million different ways and entirely on their own terms. Many people pick a Christian wedding not because they believe Jonah was swallowed by a whale but because the vows are pretty and the church is beautiful. They hanker for transcendence, regardless of doctrine. The New Atheists, like all good fundamentalists, regard this functionality as hollow or hypocritical. The religious call it a paradox and they just live with it.
America has always been a Christian society in that same secular, paradoxical sense. Political communication experts David Domke and Kevin Coe have written a fascinating analysis (http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1735972,00.html) of the origin of the phrase “God Bless America”, often used by Presidents at the end of their speeches. The practice started with Richard Nixon, who slipped the words in at the end of a televised address on Watergate in 1973. Ronald Reagan turned it into a standard sign-off. He ended 90 percent of his major addresses that way – George HW Bush did so on 90 percent of occassions, Bill Clinton 89 percent and George W Bush 84 percent. Domke and Coe make this observation: “Used sparingly, the words “God bless America” would have to be taken as a serious theological proposition. Instead, like Nike’s “Just Do It” or any other ubiquitous catchphrase in American culture, the words eventually lose their meaning. Today, “God bless America” has become the Pennsylvania Avenue equivalent to the taglines of Madison Avenue.”
Domke and Coe write with a heavy dose of sarcasm, but their study reinforces the point that over time religious symbolism develops a civil dimension. Christianity, Judaism, Islam and all the other world’s faiths have shaped our culture in a way that is inescapable. Eradicate them from the public sphere and we’d all be culturally and linguistically poorer for it. The cross should stay and the geeky, bizarre people that it offends should try looking the other way.
[url]http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100098875/the-attack-on-the-911-cross-exposes-the-bizarre-fundamentalism-of-american-atheists/
I wasn't aware that Nixon was the first President to use it, but I do remember the furore in Berlin in 1979 when The Deer Hunter was shown at the Berlin Film Festival and the Russians (and others) objected to the 'russian roulette' sequence. The film ends with a rendition of 'God Bless America' and in context is a troubled form of relief and respect for the survivors.
I have met two Americans who claimed to be Communists, and they were some of the most extreme I have met -one also told me he was going back to DC to work on a campaign to elect a friend of his, a Republican. I tried to point out the contradiction but he shrugged his shoulders 'Its all politics'..! Extreme Americans can however be very scary.
For the records, God Save the Queen is used sparingly here, and thank -er, heavens? -for that. Enjoy. The link follows the text.
The attack on the 9/11 cross exposes the bizarre fundamentalism of American atheists
By Tim Stanley (http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/author/timstanley/) US politics (http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/category/us-politics/) Last updated: July 28th, 2011
[/URL]
(http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100098875/the-attack-on-the-911-cross-exposes-the-bizarre-fundamentalism-of-american-atheists/#disqus_thread)
http://1.2.3.11/bmi/blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/files/2011/07/wtccross2large.jpg
America’s culture war took an unpleasant turn this week. A group of atheists filed a suit (http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/07/27/atheist-group-files-lawsuit-against-display-wtc-cross-at-11-memorial/) to take down a cross erected at the Lower Manhattan memorial to the victims of 9/11. The cross was formed from two intersecting steel beams that were found intact in the rubble. Dave Silverman, head of the American Atheists, called the display a breach of the separation between church and state. He said that the cross “has become a Christian icon. It has been blessed by so-called holy men and presented as a reminder that their god, who couldn’t be bothered to stop the Muslim terrorists or prevent 3,000 people from being killed in his name, cared only enough to bestow upon us some rubble that resembles a cross.”
The story itself is a storm in a tea cup. The cross will probably stay because it has attained a cultural status beyond religious symbolism. To many viewers it is a physical reminder of the devastation and a metaphor for the resurrection of New York as a city. What is remarkable is where Silverman’s American Atheists have chosen to make their big stand. Picking on a memorial to the victims of 9/11 exposes the profound lack of sensitivity of the New Atheism and its obsessive, socially awkward edge. Some atheist activists suggested that the cross could stay if it were accompanied by symbols from other religions. They miss the point that the cross was only erected because it was found at Ground Zero. Presumably, if a fax machine had been discovered melted into the shape of Ganesh then that would have gone display, too. But that didn’t happen and it’s extraordinary, given its tragic origins, that the American Atheists can’t tolerate this modest statement. What will they protest about next? The crosses over the graves at Arlington Cemetery?
The fact is that the New Atheists aren’t interested in either pluralism or being left alone. They are iconoclasts and they enjoy breaking things. Take the case of the Mojave Memorial Cross - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Mojave_Memorial_Cross_1.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Mojave_Memorial_Cross_1.jpg/220px-Mojave_Memorial_Cross_1.jpg"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/2/23/Mojave_Memorial_Cross_1.jpg/220px-Mojave_Memorial_Cross_1.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojave_Memorial_Cross), erected in 1934 in memory of Americans killed in war. It was a beautiful, simple white cross that stood above the rocky desert and gave comfort to millions who saw it. The problem for those who cared: it was planted on public land. For years it was subject to vandalism and law suits, until the Supreme Court ruled that it could stay after the earth it stood on was transferred to a Veterans group. In May 2010, it went missing – stolen by a protestor. Again, it’s important to stress that the Mojave Cross had never been a purely Christian monument. Like the 9/11 cross, it used a universal symbol of death and rebirth to celebrate the sacrifices of millions of America’s soldiers. Whatever lunatic stole it, it was a truly sociopathic act.
What the New Atheists don’t get is that religion is functional: people engage with it in a million different ways and entirely on their own terms. Many people pick a Christian wedding not because they believe Jonah was swallowed by a whale but because the vows are pretty and the church is beautiful. They hanker for transcendence, regardless of doctrine. The New Atheists, like all good fundamentalists, regard this functionality as hollow or hypocritical. The religious call it a paradox and they just live with it.
America has always been a Christian society in that same secular, paradoxical sense. Political communication experts David Domke and Kevin Coe have written a fascinating analysis (http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1735972,00.html) of the origin of the phrase “God Bless America”, often used by Presidents at the end of their speeches. The practice started with Richard Nixon, who slipped the words in at the end of a televised address on Watergate in 1973. Ronald Reagan turned it into a standard sign-off. He ended 90 percent of his major addresses that way – George HW Bush did so on 90 percent of occassions, Bill Clinton 89 percent and George W Bush 84 percent. Domke and Coe make this observation: “Used sparingly, the words “God bless America” would have to be taken as a serious theological proposition. Instead, like Nike’s “Just Do It” or any other ubiquitous catchphrase in American culture, the words eventually lose their meaning. Today, “God bless America” has become the Pennsylvania Avenue equivalent to the taglines of Madison Avenue.”
Domke and Coe write with a heavy dose of sarcasm, but their study reinforces the point that over time religious symbolism develops a civil dimension. Christianity, Judaism, Islam and all the other world’s faiths have shaped our culture in a way that is inescapable. Eradicate them from the public sphere and we’d all be culturally and linguistically poorer for it. The cross should stay and the geeky, bizarre people that it offends should try looking the other way.
[url]http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100098875/the-attack-on-the-911-cross-exposes-the-bizarre-fundamentalism-of-american-atheists/