Seven reasons why black people have no honour

[arnie666]

YouTube - Seven Reasons Why Black People Have No Honor (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erL6BtXJJHQ)

One thing, if Black people have no honour for allowing themselves to be slaves and not rising up.Then white people have no honour for ever keeping them as slaves.There is no honour in slavery on either side.

Also he talks about being against race mixing when it comes to Obama but then later says he is alright with it with anyone else?

What a loony.

[trish]

So what's that sign say behind the speaker? "Mr. Obama..." (notice the legitimacy of the president is being questioned by the very first word in the sign...clever)..."Mr. Obama: Show us your Birth Certificate, Please." You know he's going to be a loony before you even click the play button.

[PomonaCA]

The legitimacy of the president is not in question. The legitimacy of Obama is in question. Stop playing on words, it's obvious.

[trish]

Awe. Does the little boy want his country back?

[PomonaCA]

Awe. Does the little boy want his country back?

We'll find grounds to impeach soon enough.

[yodajazz]

We'll find grounds to impeach soon enough.
Only because because Republicans dont mind subverting the Constitutional electoral process, for the gain of the party. President Bush lied, to get the nation into war with Iraq. Many people died, so that's a variation of murder. However, since he was not charged, I'm will to just exercise my rights as a citizen to vote, and speak out publicly for what I believe, even though I believe Bush was an accessory to murder.

Let look at Bill Clinton's impeachment. The President of the United States has a duty to assist with the protection of our nation. OK let's say that lying about a sexual affair, is criminal for lying under oath. It in fact was not more important than protecting American lives. During the time of the build up to the impeachment process, a man named Osama Bin Laden issued a Fatwa that it was ok for to kill Americans where ever they were, I believe, (it may have been only soldiers). Bin Laden's Fatwa was mostly like page 6 news, where the newspaper covers and broadcast leads were showing pictures of Clinton hugging, Monica Lewinsky in public. Not only was the impeachment distracting to the President to perform his more important duties, but it distracted from the public's awareness to the true threats on America. I recall during the time, the President launched missile strikes to kill Bin Laden, and many said that he was just trying to distract attention from the impeach process events.

So if in fact, Bin Laden and/or radical Muslims were responsible for 9/11/01, the impeachment process was a contributing factor in the violent deaths of over 3,000 Americans. Perhaps, people would have been more suspicious of Muslims taking pilot training, but not caring about landing skills, if the nation's attention had not been diverted. Clinton's perjury stuff could have been delayed until he got out of office, for him to perform his more important duties.

So it appears to me that conservative/Republican dont seem to mind if thousand of people die violent deaths, as long as they can get back into power. I say this is a case of obvious hypocracy.

Sure you'll dig up something on Obama, like he had unpaid parking tickets as a state senator, or something. Meanwhile, people are losing their homes to catastrohic illnesses, or chronic unemployment, or dying with diseases on your doorstep, war veteran with nightmares, are shooting up malls, and financiers with millions in fraud are going unprosecuted. Then you will continue to lie to yourself, to say thing like, Obama's parking tickets are more important, than hundreds of thousands of people losing their retirement saving, to financial malpractice. So go ahead with your plans. In the end, you will get back something directly, from the human issues that you chose to ignore. I wonder if you will learn, from it or not?

[yodajazz]

YouTube - Seven Reasons Why Black People Have No Honor (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erL6BtXJJHQ)

One thing, if Black people have no honour for allowing themselves to be slaves and not rising up.Then white people have no honour for ever keeping them as slaves.There is no honour in slavery on either side.

Also he talks about being against race mixing when it comes to Obama but then later says he is alright with it with anyone else?

What a loony.

I agree with you, but I cant watch anymore of his videos. What I saw in the past made me lose all respect for the man. He strikes me as a who would say anything for attentions, and Obama is his scapegoat. I watched a video of his when Obama was a candidate. He claimed Obama was a pimp, because no one knew him until the "Obama girl" shook her big titties. That actually says more about him than it does about Obama. He called Obama's mother "White trash". Again that says more about him, than it does her. Her son was running for president at the time. I watched a response video, that called him a "buffoon". I thought the response was pretty right on. I dont know what title, he uses here, but in the video that I watched back he was a Christian Minister in the pulpit talking that stuff. Much of what he said, goes against the principles of Jesus as I understand them.

[PomonaCA]

Only because because Republicans dont mind subverting the Constitutional electoral process, for the gain of the party. President Bush lied, to get the nation into war with Iraq. Many people died, so that's a variation of murder. However, since he was not charged, I'm will to just exercise my rights as a citizen to vote, and speak out publicly for what I believe, even though I believe Bush was an accessory to murder.

Let look at Bill Clinton's impeachment. The President of the United States has a duty to assist with the protection of our nation. OK let's say that lying about a sexual affair, is criminal for lying under oath. It in fact was not more important than protecting American lives. During the time of the build up to the impeachment process, a man named Osama Bin Laden issued a Fatwa that it was ok for to kill Americans where ever they were, I believe, (it may have been only soldiers). Bin Laden's Fatwa was mostly like page 6 news, where the newspaper covers and broadcast leads were showing pictures of Clinton hugging, Monica Lewinsky in public. Not only was the impeachment distracting to the President to perform his more important duties, but it distracted from the public's awareness to the true threats on America. I recall during the time, the President launched missile strikes to kill Bin Laden, and many said that he was just trying to distract attention from the impeach process events.

So if in fact, Bin Laden and/or radical Muslims were responsible for 9/11/01, the impeachment process was a contributing factor in the violent deaths of over 3,000 Americans. Perhaps, people would have been more suspicious of Muslims taking pilot training, but not caring about landing skills, if the nation's attention had not been diverted. Clinton's perjury stuff could have been delayed until he got out of office, for him to perform his more important duties.

So it appears to me that conservative/Republican dont seem to mind if thousand of people die violent deaths, as long as they can get back into power. I say this is a case of obvious hypocracy.

Sure you'll dig up something on Obama, like he had unpaid parking tickets as a state senator, or something. Meanwhile, people are losing their homes to catastrohic illnesses, or chronic unemployment, or dying with diseases on your doorstep, war veteran with nightmares, are shooting up malls, and financiers with millions in fraud are going unprosecuted. Then you will continue to lie to yourself, to say thing like, Obama's parking tickets are more important, than hundreds of thousands of people losing their retirement saving, to financial malpractice. So go ahead with your plans. In the end, you will get back something directly, from the human issues that you chose to ignore. I wonder if you will learn, from it or not?


The president doesn't have to commit a felony to be impeached. All we need is a high crime or a misdemeanor but I don't suppose that the language in the constitution means anything to you. 3 years into the idiot administration and you're still blaming Bush? And what lie do you speak of?

[yodajazz]

The president doesn't have to commit a felony to be impeached. All we need is a high crime or a misdemeanor but I don't suppose that the language in the constitution means anything to you. 3 years into the idiot administration and you're still blaming Bush? And what lie do you speak of?

So Obama, who was a state senator, at the time, is now responsible for the attack on Iraq? The Bush Administration, nor the Republican majority in Congress, had nothing to do with the war? And by the way, simple math, Obama will have been in office two years as of January 20th.

You missed the whole point of my post. I'm saying that the US should have been more focused on the threat of radical Islam before 9/11. I'm saying that the focus on Bill Clinton's affair, took critical time away from him perfroming his duties, and the American public's attention on real threats to America. I did not say that Clinton should not be held repsonsible for his actions. But what other President had to deal with a lawsuit while he was in office? He under investigation for his whole 8 years in office, and the only thing they could make stick, was lying about a sexual affair. But lying about the reasons for going to war, with over 100,000 people dead, is not that serious.

The Constitution established a democracy, but Republicans dont care, but try to win the presidency by come technicality, like the doctor did not sign Obama's birth certificate. When the Republicans take a majority in congress, its called a "public mandate". But when a Democrat wins the presidency, some people feel free to disrespect the office, yet claim they love the constitution, and love America. It's called hypocrisy.

[PomonaCA]

So Obama, who was a state senator, at the time, is now responsible for the attack on Iraq? The Bush Administration, nor the Republican majority in Congress, had nothing to do with the war? And by the way, simple math, Obama will have been in office two years as of January 20th.

You missed the whole point of my post. I'm saying that the US should have been more focused on the threat of radical Islam before 9/11. I'm saying that the focus on Bill Clinton's affair, took critical time away from him perfroming his duties, and the American public's attention on real threats to America. I did not say that Clinton should not be held repsonsible for his actions. But what other President had to deal with a lawsuit while he was in office? He under investigation for his whole 8 years in office, and the only thing they could make stick, was lying about a sexual affair. But lying about the reasons for going to war, with over 100,000 people dead, is not that serious.

The Constitution established a democracy, but Republicans dont care, but try to win the presidency by come technicality, like the doctor did not sign Obama's birth certificate. When the Republicans take a majority in congress, its called a "public mandate". But when a Democrat wins the presidency, some people feel free to disrespect the office, yet claim they love the constitution, and love America. It's called hypocrisy.

Oh please. Now you're excusing Clinton's incompetence in terror related matters with the impeachment? He brought it on himself. If he were a real man he would have acted like one. Instead, Republicans had to expose him as the lying, double talking motherfucker that he is.

High crimes and misdemeanors. It's in the constitution. I know you lefties like to play word games like "Which constitution are we reading?", but it's been there all this time and not even your precious intelligence can change it.