APD1
11-24-2005, 09:24 PM
Hi! :P .... been looking through some of the pictures pre and post surgery posted by Allanah and Vicki.
I'm curious.Is the decision to go under the knife simply a matter of looking in the mirror, not liking what you see, and then getting a quality surgeon to fix it?Do any of the girls here have a preconceived idea of the face they want to end up?
I suppose most people here know about the golden mean,or golden ratio.If not:
http://www.beautyanalysis.com/index2_mba.htm
The faces we find intuitively beautiful,composed of ajoining parts that are in the ratio 1.618:1 .We see the same ratio in Greek sculptures,Renaissance paintings , Indian temple carvings to modern fashion magazines.
Another few images:
http://www.beautyanalysis.com/index2_mba.htm
I was watching a BBC documentary on the golden ratio.In an experiment the public consistently prefered a face which had been digitally altered to fit with the golden mean.
I've seen Doug Ousterhout use a golden mean gauge
http://www.goldenmeangauge.co.uk/ when deciding the final proportions in feminization surgery.This probably explains why he generally has better results when he works on the whole face;everything has to be in proportion.
(on a minor point I think Dr Ousterhout takes a bit too much away, in a jaw reduction, from the sideline of the jaw; but I suppose, from looking at the work of other surgeons, he is pretty conservative).
Put it simply beauty is ,though, in the eye of the beholder, based on ,well established, aesthetic and scientific principles.If its fixed don't break it.Well, that's my two cents.Till then.....
Happy Thanksgiving :D
PS how do you post links properly? :? :?:
I'm curious.Is the decision to go under the knife simply a matter of looking in the mirror, not liking what you see, and then getting a quality surgeon to fix it?Do any of the girls here have a preconceived idea of the face they want to end up?
I suppose most people here know about the golden mean,or golden ratio.If not:
http://www.beautyanalysis.com/index2_mba.htm
The faces we find intuitively beautiful,composed of ajoining parts that are in the ratio 1.618:1 .We see the same ratio in Greek sculptures,Renaissance paintings , Indian temple carvings to modern fashion magazines.
Another few images:
http://www.beautyanalysis.com/index2_mba.htm
I was watching a BBC documentary on the golden ratio.In an experiment the public consistently prefered a face which had been digitally altered to fit with the golden mean.
I've seen Doug Ousterhout use a golden mean gauge
http://www.goldenmeangauge.co.uk/ when deciding the final proportions in feminization surgery.This probably explains why he generally has better results when he works on the whole face;everything has to be in proportion.
(on a minor point I think Dr Ousterhout takes a bit too much away, in a jaw reduction, from the sideline of the jaw; but I suppose, from looking at the work of other surgeons, he is pretty conservative).
Put it simply beauty is ,though, in the eye of the beholder, based on ,well established, aesthetic and scientific principles.If its fixed don't break it.Well, that's my two cents.Till then.....
Happy Thanksgiving :D
PS how do you post links properly? :? :?: