chefmike

[addicted]

This clown has zero knowledge of politics yet he stays planted in this section as if he owns a piece of property. When you challenge his primative prehostoric views he gets buttsore and upset in a very femanine manner. he uses the same reference over and over about this tinfoil that he wears. Mike I just dont get it and you make no sense. Why dont you get the fuck off this board and stop spreading your lies and backwards ass mentality.

fuck you

[chefmike]

Did I hurt your feelings, shit stain?



:sadcry :sadcry :sadcry :sadcry :sadcry

[chefmike]

This clown has zero knowledge of politics yet he stays planted in this section as if he owns a piece of property. When you challenge his primative prehostoric views he gets buttsore and upset in a very femanine manner. he uses the same reference over and over about this tinfoil that he wears. Mike I just dont get it and you make no sense. Why dont you get the fuck off this board and stop spreading your lies and backwards ass mentality.

fuck you

Maybe you should think about finishing high school instead if chasing trannies, cretin.

[El Nino]

This clown has zero knowledge of politics yet he stays planted in this section as if he owns a piece of property. When you challenge his primative prehostoric views he gets buttsore and upset in a very femanine manner. he uses the same reference over and over about this tinfoil that he wears. Mike I just dont get it and you make no sense. Why dont you get the fuck off this board and stop spreading your lies and backwards ass mentality.

fuck you

Wow, somebody actually can "see" here... Nice work!

[chefmike]

BWAAAHAAAHAAHAHAHA!!!!


worthy2 aka addicted aka adipshit is having another moron meltdown!!! Check it out!!

http://www.hungangels.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=42040&start=40

[chefmike]

This clown has zero knowledge of politics yet he stays planted in this section as if he owns a piece of property. When you challenge his primative prehostoric views he gets buttsore and upset in a very femanine manner. he uses the same reference over and over about this tinfoil that he wears. Mike I just dont get it and you make no sense. Why dont you get the fuck off this board and stop spreading your lies and backwards ass mentality.

fuck you

Wow, somebody actually can "see" here... Nice work!

Look! It's dumb and dumber! HA's nutty buddies!! :lol:

[chefmike]

:lol:


http://www.hungangels.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=37452&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

[kittyKaiti]

This clown has zero knowledge of politics yet he stays planted in this section as if he owns a piece of property. When you challenge his primative prehostoric views he gets buttsore and upset in a very femanine manner. he uses the same reference over and over about this tinfoil that he wears. Mike I just dont get it and you make no sense. Why dont you get the fuck off this board and stop spreading your lies and backwards ass mentality.

fuck you


Chefmike has no knowledge of politics yet you get all your information from sites like infowars.com. And stop bashing women, faggot.

[daveskarety]

I feel I must comment here as I hate to see people wasting their energies on 'immovable minds'. It's just a thought, but I think you should stop letting this chefmike guy bother you so much and put your energies into waking up people who are receptive to the truth. The fact is that some people cannot handle the truth and so they will derail any kind of attempt to debate the subject and force it to degenerate into a simple bout of name-calling, backed up with zero facts, in order to feel 'safe'. This is what is called 'dumbing down the debate' and it is the simplest of all defences.

People like this will always scream 'tinfoil hat wearer' at you because it is far easier than them examining the evidence for themselves and drawing a reasoned and informed conclusion. Even if that conclusion turns out to be at odd's with your own, it could still be respected as it would be, at least, an informed opinion. This guy's mind is made up and 'immovable' and trying to convince him that what you are saying is true serves no purpose. He, and you and I for that matter, will find out who speaks the truth soon enough. Meanwhile move on, start a website, start a local We Are Change chapter, do anything to direct your energies toward a more positive objective, ie informing people with open minds. People who, like most rational people, DO have questions about 9/11, DO have questions about the War on Terror and DO have questions about the Banker Bailout and who their Governments work for and how they conduct themselves. Just my two cents!

PS Flame away chefmike, I couldn't give a shit!

PPS Kittykaiti I don't know where the women bashing comment comes from, I presume that is something from another thread? However, for the record, I do not condone the bashing of ANYONE, period. I am pro-human race and pro-humanity, no matter what package it comes in! Hence why I am so passionate about holding my Govt accountable for acts of treason and torture, especially when the weight of evidence against them is so great.

[trish]

On the other hand, the source of the evidence can be an indicator that the “evidence” is just not worth wading through. Sometimes, the claim being made is an indicator that the argument is not worth reading. Patent officials are instructed, with good reason, to ignore claims of perpetual motion, mathematicians ignore letters that purport to square the circle and historians aren’t clamoring to chronicle the adventures of the lost tribe of Israel in North America as described in the writings of the prophet Joseph Smith. There’s so little time, and so many sources to pursue of more promising integrity.

[Oli]

I feel I must comment here as I hate to see people wasting their energies on 'immovable minds'. It's just a thought, but I think you should stop letting this chefmike guy bother you so much and put your energies into waking up people who are receptive to the truth. The fact is that some people cannot handle the truth and so they will derail any kind of attempt to debate the subject and force it to degenerate into a simple bout of name-calling, backed up with zero facts, in order to feel 'safe'. This is what is called 'dumbing down the debate' and it is the simplest of all defences.

People like this will always scream 'tinfoil hat wearer' at you because it is far easier than them examining the evidence for themselves and drawing a reasoned and informed conclusion. Even if that conclusion turns out to be at odd's with your own, it could still be respected as it would be, at least, an informed opinion. This guy's mind is made up and 'immovable' and trying to convince him that what you are saying is true serves no purpose. He, and you and I for that matter, will find out who speaks the truth soon enough. Meanwhile move on, start a website, start a local We Are Change chapter, do anything to direct your energies toward a more positive objective, ie informing people with open minds. People who, like most rational people, DO have questions about 9/11, DO have questions about the War on Terror and DO have questions about the Banker Bailout and who their Governments work for and how they conduct themselves. Just my two cents!


This diatribe from the man who said this!!


9/11? Total Inside Job! I am still amazed when I meet anyone who thinks otherwise

Talk about an 'immovable' mind. Trish is right...schlock science isn't worth the time or energy and the crap your peddling is based solely on schlock science and hearsay.

[El Nino]

I feel I must comment here as I hate to see people wasting their energies on 'immovable minds'. It's just a thought, but I think you should stop letting this chefmike guy bother you so much and put your energies into waking up people who are receptive to the truth. The fact is that some people cannot handle the truth and so they will derail any kind of attempt to debate the subject and force it to degenerate into a simple bout of name-calling, backed up with zero facts, in order to feel 'safe'. This is what is called 'dumbing down the debate' and it is the simplest of all defences.

People like this will always scream 'tinfoil hat wearer' at you because it is far easier than them examining the evidence for themselves and drawing a reasoned and informed conclusion. Even if that conclusion turns out to be at odd's with your own, it could still be respected as it would be, at least, an informed opinion. This guy's mind is made up and 'immovable' and trying to convince him that what you are saying is true serves no purpose. He, and you and I for that matter, will find out who speaks the truth soon enough. Meanwhile move on, start a website, start a local We Are Change chapter, do anything to direct your energies toward a more positive objective, ie informing people with open minds. People who, like most rational people, DO have questions about 9/11, DO have questions about the War on Terror and DO have questions about the Banker Bailout and who their Governments work for and how they conduct themselves. Just my two cents!

PS Flame away chefmike, I couldn't give a shit!

PPS Kittykaiti I don't know where the women bashing comment comes from, I presume that is something from another thread? However, for the record, I do not condone the bashing of ANYONE, period. I am pro-human race and pro-humanity, no matter what package it comes in! Hence why I am so passionate about holding my Govt accountable for acts of treason and torture, especially when the weight of evidence against them is so great.

For what it's worth, maybe this might shed some light on the situation. It's a term I've used here before: "Cognitive Dissonance"

http://www.ashburnelementary.blogspot.com/

[Oli]

For what it's worth, maybe this might shed some light on the situation. It's a term I've used here before: "Cognitive Dissonance"


The irony in that statement is rich. :shock: :shock:

[El Nino]

Is it Oli?

[chefmike]

For what it's worth, maybe this might shed some light on the situation. It's a term I've used here before: "Cognitive Dissonance"


The irony in that statement is rich. :shock: :shock:

Isn't it? :lol:

[arnie666]

while myself and chef mike are poles apart in politics and I will piss myself laughing when Sarah Palin becomes presidente of the United States, bringing with her sexyness hellfire and brimstone on the abortionists and faggots , I find him a rather intelligent person and I would far rather share a pint of guiness with an ex serviceman than some of the muppets on here.

He at least knows a cunt when he can smell it and I rather like the cut of his jib when dealing with some of the mouthbreathers on here. Legend and the trannys in de hood (mimi vannesa et al) are the ones who grip my shit.

[addicted]

This clown has zero knowledge of politics yet he stays planted in this section as if he owns a piece of property. When you challenge his primative prehostoric views he gets buttsore and upset in a very femanine manner. he uses the same reference over and over about this tinfoil that he wears. Mike I just dont get it and you make no sense. Why dont you get the fuck off this board and stop spreading your lies and backwards ass mentality.

fuck you

Maybe you should think about finishing high school instead if chasing trannies, cretin.

Why are so obsessed with me? Why are you on this crusade to prove your prehostoric thinking is law? I think you are upset because everything you stand politicaly is bullshit and has failed. Now you are standing there like a deer in headlights, Confused and ashamed.

[addicted]

This clown has zero knowledge of politics yet he stays planted in this section as if he owns a piece of property. When you challenge his primative prehostoric views he gets buttsore and upset in a very femanine manner. he uses the same reference over and over about this tinfoil that he wears. Mike I just dont get it and you make no sense. Why dont you get the fuck off this board and stop spreading your lies and backwards ass mentality.

fuck you


Chefmike has no knowledge of politics yet you get all your information from sites like infowars.com. And stop bashing women, faggot.

I dont who the fuck you are writing this gay ass faggotry post but fuck you faggot.

[chefmike]

This clown has zero knowledge of politics yet he stays planted in this section as if he owns a piece of property. When you challenge his primative prehostoric views he gets buttsore and upset in a very femanine manner. he uses the same reference over and over about this tinfoil that he wears. Mike I just dont get it and you make no sense. Why dont you get the fuck off this board and stop spreading your lies and backwards ass mentality.

fuck you

Maybe you should think about finishing high school instead if chasing trannies, cretin.

Why are so obsessed with me? Why are you on this crusade to prove your prehostoric thinking is law? I think you are upset because everything you stand politicaly is bullshit and has failed. Now you are standing there like a deer in headlights, Confused and ashamed.

:lol:

[chefmike]

while myself and chef mike are poles apart in politics and I will piss myself laughing when Sarah Palin becomes presidente of the United States, bringing with her sexyness hellfire and brimstone on the abortionists and faggots , I find him a rather intelligent person and I would far rather share a pint of guiness with an ex serviceman than some of the muppets on here.

He at least knows a cunt when he can smell it and I rather like the cut of his jib when dealing with some of the mouthbreathers on here. Legend and the trannys in de hood (mimi vannesa et al) are the ones who grip my shit.
Thanks Arnie, I'd gladly hoist a couple of pints with you, but I don't plan on crossing the pond any time soon. I used to drink on occasion with some Brits who were serving in the merchant marine in my swabbie days, and they were good people and even better drinking buddies.

As for Palin the caribou queen, she could very well end up with the GOP nomination, but she ain't about to win the election! Of course stranger things have happened. Bush Jr. managed to get himself re-elected when he never won the office to begin with!!

[daveskarety]

This diatribe from the man who said this!!


9/11? Total Inside Job! I am still amazed when I meet anyone who thinks otherwise

Talk about an 'immovable' mind. Trish is right...schlock science isn't worth the time or energy and the crap your peddling is based solely on schlock science and hearsay.

Well chefmike me old china, I am amazed when I meet anyone who believes that the official story of 911 is the truth, truly I am. Even people who know that the US Govt constantly lie still believe that, just this once, they have told us the truth, I find that baffling! However, unlike yourself, I don't instantly leap to verbal abuse as my first and, it seems, only line of rebuttal. I was stating my opinion mate, I'll say it again - MY OPINION. An opinion which, personally, I regard as informed and considered. You obviously disgree, which is cool. As for my mind being immovable you would, if you knew me, be very aware that I regard my opinions as fluid and not immovable. I believed the official account of 911 for years, until I saw evidence I was not aware of before which changed my opinion. As John Maynard Keynes said 'When the facts change, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?' and that's very much my outlook. So come on chefmike, do some research of your own, instead of just hurling insults, and try to change my mind. If you are right, and you can back up your opinions with facts, then maybe you'll succeed!

I would just like to point out, again, that I couldn't give a shit what you think mate, live in your bubble and dish out your abuse. No fuck given from this direction! The point of my original post was to say to others on here that they shouldn't waste their time on immovable minds like yours. Not unless the mind in question belongs to someone who is capable of engaging them in reasoned and informed debate. I'm afraid that people who merely post 'funny' pictures and say 'where's your tinfoil hat?' don't fall into that category and, therefore, are simply not worth the effort. Sorry to break that to you mate!

They, like I, should think more positively, and direct their energies towards people with a more open mind. That way we can, hopefully, hold some of these crooks to account. As for science maybe you should take the time to look at http://www.ae911truth.org/ and read through some of their research and peer-reviewed papers before your next bout of name-calling - 'schlock science' indeed :)

[chefmike]

Actually I responded to Oli's quote, pilgrim. Perhaps you should take a break from immersing yourself in idiotic conspiracy theories(not to mention the hucksters who profit from dupes like yourself) and do a little research on the quote function, Einstein.

Not to worry though...as far as you, Nino and the rest of the tinfoil militia go....what can I say?

Birds of a feather.... :roll:

[El Nino]

Typical response. Chef loves his bubble...

[Niccolo]

That link didn't work btw

[plankton]

This clown has zero knowledge of politics yet he stays planted in this section as if he owns a piece of property. When you challenge his primative prehostoric views he gets buttsore and upset in a very femanine manner. he uses the same reference over and over about this tinfoil that he wears. Mike I just dont get it and you make no sense. Why dont you get the fuck off this board and stop spreading your lies and backwards ass mentality.

fuck youActually your wrong. Although i disagree with him on loads and loads and loads and loads of things pertaining to politics and the like . He does know politics and keeps fairly well imformed. It's his opinion or interpretation of politics and events that pertain to government and social shit that you don't like.....god i can't believe i just defended that bitchy ass .

[daveskarety]

Actually I responded to Oli's quote, pilgrim. Perhaps you should take a break from immersing yourself in idiotic conspiracy theories(not to mention the hucksters who profit from dupes like yourself) and do a little research on the quote function, Einstein.

Not to worry though...as far as you, Nino and the rest of the tinfoil militia go....what can I say?

Birds of a feather.... :roll:


Tinfoil Mentioned check
'Funny' picture posted check
Insults and abuse check
Ability to backup opinion zero

Yup a typical chefmike post! Bubble intact! BTW if it's quotes you want;

'All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.'
Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher (1788 - 1860)

So do you think Einstein would agree with me on that one chef? Or is irony lost on you chef? How's the research progressing chef? If I am a pilgrim chef, then I at least am one that tries to progress chef (see what I did there?) Are you ready to properly debate chef? Or will you merely refer to tinfoil chef? Mind you, being a chef, chef. I guess it must play a large part in your life chef. But there is a world beyond cookery chef.........

[chefmike]

Debate?

LMFAO...you are a truther.

Hence you are a cyberspace laughingstock at best.

For the most part you and your ilk are just annoying trolls and a waste of bandwidth.

Yet you still get your tinfoil panties in a twist when people are so immediately and justifiably dismissive of you.

I'd tell you to get a clue, but why bother?

You wouldn't know what to do with it, pilgrim.

Later, clown.

[chefmike]

:)

http://www.hungangels.com/board/viewtopic.php?p=610698#610698

[daveskarety]

You really don't do yourself any favours do you mate? I am a 'truther'?? I never said that! That's you attempting to define me by ONE opinion mate! Try to remember that, I have not imposed any labels upon you aside from the ones that you so effortlessly exhibit each and every time you type your latest, repetitive post on here. I'm still yet to hear of your research too mate. All we get is your, seemingly reactionary, opinions.

After reading your last post I am left to ask why are you so quick to write off any powers you may posess to persuade me of your opinions, if you even have them, without even trying? And why do you presume I lack the ability to comprehend any pearls of wisdom which you may dane to cast my pilgrimous, unworthy way? Could it be that, when confronted, you simply realise that your 'opinions' are simple regurgitations of Mainline Editorial and that you have absolutely nothing concrete to back up the 'truth' which you profess to be so closely acquainted with? By your definition, maybe that qualifies you as a 'truther' of sorts?

It's astonishing that you bang on and on about me being a 'truther' and a 'cyberspace laughingstock' when you, it would appear are the epitome of both! Whilst, in the real world, I practise what I preach. I am, what you may call, an ethical Lawyer, you know the poor kind with principals and an inquiring mind. Not someone, like yourself, who pops on here to crack one off in between being insulted about the quality of my souffle and then, in a fit of post-onanistic pique, engages themself in political arguments without even having the first clue or desire to articulate their 'opinion' - save for the rabid cry of 'T I N F O I L - I T ' S - E V E R Y W H E R E !'. BTW what the fuck is it with you and tinfoil? Where you molested by a Turkey one thanksgiving or something?

Anyway, as I said earlier, why bother with 'immovable minds' 3 pages in and zero progress from you. I did think you would prove my initial impression of you correct and you have. TTFN chef, your souffle, like your bridges, are burning!

[El Nino]

Best response ever! Set his ass straight for a lifetime...
Dave, great articulation and a big cheers to setting the record straight, on so many levels.

[addicted]

I am still here chefmike, Keep whining the admin's you rat snitch. nobody likes a rat.

[El Nino]

What's this business about "ratting" people out here? Ratting for what? Speaking opinins? Seriously...

[thx1138]

Mike has yet to refute anything coming from a reputable source posted here. The reason is he can't. He's the same guy that said 2 years ago the economy was in great shape. He hangs out here because he's paid to. Site management feels a need a to have a clown to shake things up from time to time. Mike fits the bill perfectly. He's a good name caller but has the intellectual capacity of a flea.

[chefmike]

Mike has yet to refute anything coming from a reputable source posted here.Reliable source? LMAO. This from the buffoon who said Ted Turner was a paid disinformationalist for the NWO. You mean to say that you and your handful of fellow laughingstocks have ever posted anything but absurd BS from the likes of Alex Jones et al? I wonder if anyone ever noticed it. Not bloody likely, simpleton.


He's the same guy that said 2 years ago the economy was in great shape.

Note the date thx registered on this site. More fantasy from the acorn academy alumnus. Produce a quote and URL, slick.

That's what I thought.

You clowns are pathetic.

[chefmike]

Something to leave El Ninny, thx and their tinfoil circle jerk with:

“Listening to alex jones on the radio (is) kind of like being mentally gang raped by retards who keep putting their dicks in the wrong holes and then claim that the government hid the normal ones.”

Once again, thanks for the laughs.

However unintentional they were... :lol:

[chefmike]

HIV Denialist Gary Null

http://www.actupny.org/reports/denialist_gary_null.html

Holocaust at Waco, by Gary Null (http://www.bigeye.com/pentwaco.htm)


.LMAO...that's perfect material for the tinfoil circle jerk that worthless2/adipshit started over in the P&R section to bitch and whine about yours truly. This way adipshit, El Ninny, thxtinfoil and any other acorn academy alumni still lurking there have something new and appropriate for their wanking pleasure...

Very thoughtful of you, phobun. I'm sure the loony lads will be most appreciative. :lol:

http://www.hungangels.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=42192&start=30

http://www.hungangels.com/board/viewtopic.php?p=611706#611706

[Oli]

Mike has yet to refute anything coming from a reputable source posted here. The reason is he can't. He's the same guy that said 2 years ago the economy was in great shape. He hangs out here because he's paid to. Site management feels a need a to have a clown to shake things up from time to time. Mike fits the bill perfectly. He's a good name caller but has the intellectual capacity of a flea.

Hey mate, these are some of what you consider 'reputable sources'. Most intelligent people consider these sites on par with http://weeklyworldnews.com/


more:http://www.roguegovernment.com/The_Reality_Of_FEMA_Camps_And_The_Martial_Law_Appa rtus/14096/0/13/13/Y/M.html



http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2009/cbarchive_20090127.html



sponsor of world terrorism http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/2008/12/us-army-document-that-proves-us-is.html


http://www.prisonplanet.com/cynthia-mckinney-prevented-from-leaving-us.html

So, by all means continue to believe your not the Luddite in this conversation...and that applies to El Nino also.

[El Nino]

Oli... get a clue and do the research yourself... documents man, documents

[Oli]

Oli... get a clue and do the research yourself... documents man, documents

That you believe those sites carry the same intellectual weight as Bloomberg, BBC or the Economist shows that you can not discern the truth.

You're the one who needs to get a clue.

[El Nino]

Some blogs and alternative news sites just post articles that are sourced from those aforementioned sites. Anyway, its not so much the actual "site" that matters, as it is the content and its sourced derivatives.

[Oli]

Some blogs and alternative news sites just post articles that are sourced from those aforementioned sites. Anyway, its not so much the actual "site" that matters, as it is the content and its sourced derivatives.

Sites that don't have to fact check the information they post, sites that don't have an editorial board to question the integrity/validity of the information they're posting or the logic of the conclusions drawn from said information.

Not reliable...more editorial than information. But you apparently can not discern the difference.

[daveskarety]

Sites that don't have to fact check the information they post, sites that don't have an editorial board to question the integrity/validity of the information they're posting or the logic of the conclusions drawn from said information.

Not reliable...more editorial than information.

Who are you on about here mate? cnn.com or fox.com? :)

Anyway, I still can't believe you guys are all wasting your time on people who have absolutely no intention of even investigating things for themselves or engaging you in debate. Seriously, these are the same types of people, ie the ignorant majority, that lived under Hitler in the 30's and 40's, and who believed their Government and the media when they told them that a terrorist was resposible for the Reichstag Fire and that the camps weren't being built. And these guys will one day realise how blind they have been and wish they had done something sooner. These days we all know what really happened, everybody knows that the German Govt were behind the Reichstag Fire. In fact there are many parallels between the situation then and now. The Reichstag Fire was a false flag attack by the German Govt (9/11) carried out in order to invade Czechoslovakia (Afghanistan), it led directly to the formation of Germany's Dept of Homeland Security, the setting up of Dachau (Guantanamo Bay) and the 'Enabling Act' (Patriot Act). Talk about them repeating a winning formula! There was even a truth movement in Germany back then, they were called the 'White Rose Movement';

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Rose

The White Rose Movement tried to educate ordinary people, using leaflets, about the truth regarding the Reichstag Fire, the Government spying on everyone, the unlawful arrests and exectutions and also that huge holding camps were being built to house masses of people, sound familiar? However, then as now, these people were dismissed as idiots by the ignorant masses and, without the General Public caring, the leaders were eventually exectuted. May I repeat the following quote;

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher (1788 - 1860)

Please consider this the next time you are angry or annoyed because of ignorant people who constantly refer to tinfoil, and who do not wish to ask questions and who blindly folllow what the media and their Govt tells them is the truth. Remember the truth is still in stage 2, and the likes of chefmike, Oli and the rest are the violent opposers. So I say again do not waste your time on immovable minds and, whenever you feel frustrated, consider the stages of truth and the lessons of history and use your energies in the more positive pursuit of informing people who think with an open mind. Start a local We Are Change Chapter, print up a 1000 leaflets, burn some DVD's and go to the next ball game and hand them out!! May I also remind you that the survivors of the White Rose movement are today honoured by Germany whereas the complicit, ignorant, populace hang their heads in shame!

[trish]

Quite clearly Schopenhauer was prone to hyperbole. Certainly not ALL truth starts out being ridiculed. So if a philosopher is willing to overstate his case in the interest of dramatic effect, why should we take anything he says as true? This is a problem for any source of information whose main priority is sensationalism rather than professionalism, speculation rather than fact checking. The White Rose pamphlets were not sensationalist tabloids pronouncing every sort of conspiracy theory someone sent them. But existentialistcowboy, infowars, roguegovernment etc. are just that: they are the internet version of supermarket tabloids propagating any sort of sensationalism from the moon landing was faked to the fall of the twin towers was a Bush conspiracy. Beware: not every claim that is widely ridiculed is true __ indeed the odds are against it.

[daveskarety]

Quite clearly Schopenhauer was prone to hyperbole. Certainly not ALL truth starts out being ridiculed. So if a philosopher is willing to overstate his case in the interest of dramatic effect, why should we take anything he says as true.

Schopenhauer is, of course, referring to instances where truth is concealed, I didn't point that out as I thought that it would be obvious by the very nature of the discussion we are having. The rest of what you are saying re philosophy can be levelled at ANY Philosophy or any opinion at all, that decision is up to the individual. Anyway...



The White Rose pamphlets were not sensationalist tabloids pronouncing every sort of conspiracy theory someone sent them.

Easy to say that now mate, but I guarantee that is exactly how their pamphlets were regarded by the ignorant general public at the time. If people had read them instead of dismissing the people who distributed them as idiots then maybe they would have overthrown Hitler and saved countless lives, including their own!!


But existentialistcowboy, infowars, roguegovernment etc. are just that: they are the internet version of supermarket tabloids propagating any sort of sensationalism from the moon landing was faked to the fall of the twin towers was a Bush conspiracy.

I can see you have a low opinion of these sites, I only have experience of one of them - Infowars. And I think, as Greg Pallast does, that Infowars links to a lot of good, solid investigative journalism and official Govt documents to back up the points that are being made. I don't regard being directed toward the truth an act of sensationalist journalism. Moreover I also noticed that, by association, you bracketed people who say the Moon Landings were faked together with anyone questioning the official story of 9/11. I feel that says more about your prejudice, conditioning and understanding then anything I can say could, as does your belief that we all think Bush was behind it!

The idea that it was a Bush Conspiracy is a macguffin. Bush controlled nothing, no President does and the Left/Right Paradigm exists merely to divide us all. They are all controlled by the same people. Once you get your head around that then the rest becomes easier to understand! As I say I have seen enough evidence to make me question the Official Account of 9/11. The very fact that 2 of the author's of the '911 Commission Report' wrote a book stating they were lied to, that timelines didn't add up, they were fed disinfo and blocked every step of the way throughout their investigation makes me, like them, unwilling to accept it's findings. The conclusion they reach is the same as my own, that we need a fresh investigation into the events of 911. Only then can we finally find out the truth and then, maybe, when what you now regard as 'sensationalist tabloid conspiracy theory' is being told to you by Wolf Blitzer or Bill O'Reilly, even you will believe it!

[trish]

Did I bracket people? I wasn't aware. The only person of whom I spoke was Schopenhauer, and I did him the courtesy of taking him at his word and not second guessing what it was he might have intended to say. I did speak of certain websites and I did bracket those. I did not do you the discourtesy of second guessing what it is you believe or do not believe. Did I say you think Bush brought down the Twin Towers? Do you read everything with as much care? Are you as good at finding truth directed links as you are making inferences? If so, why should we find your remarks credible?

[hippifried]

Professional punditry is too often a way to get paid without having to do or know anything. I tend to look at professional philosophers the same way. It's hard to take pomposity seriously.

Don't get me wrong. There's some people who really know their stuff, but it's not hard to tell the difference. It's all in the attitude. The more someone knows, the less temptation there is to attack anyone who disagrees. Perhaps it's because the more one knows, the more they want to know.

----------------------------------------------------------

Hey Chef Mike,

Finally made the big time with a dedicated thread that you didn't even have to start yourself? Wow! Don't let it go to your head. Consider the source.

Don't let the bouillabaisse boil over.

[daveskarety]

Did I bracket people? I wasn't aware.


Well to be honest I didn't really have the time to over-analyse what you wrote, but I feel that the implication in what you wrote is obvious. We, of course, disagree!


The only person of whom I spoke was Schopenhauer, and I did him the courtesy of taking him at his word and not second guessing what it was he might have intended to say.

If you recall I did make the point that Philosophy is very much down to individual interpretation. You obviously regard my interpretation as 'second-guessing'. However you could make that comment regarding anyone's interpretation of Philosophy, as we are in the arena of the subjective, all opinions are valid. Yours AND mine!



Do you read everything with as much care? Are you as good at finding truth directed links as you are making inferences? If so, why should we find your remarks credible?

As I said, not really, not on a thread as ill-informed, informal and lacking in debate as this one. However returning to your allegation regarding my credibility. You hit the nail right on the head, why should you regard me as credible? I don't think you should blindly regard anyone's opinion as 'credible', not without them engaging you in debate, something impossible to do round here it seems! We should all question EVERYTHING that we are told, not just agree or dismiss out of hand! That is the way to engender some decent debate in order to make us all examine what we preceive to be 'the truth'. To take the issue of 911 as an example. It is amazing how I have yet to meet ANYONE able to properly lay out, even less defend, with all it's inconsistencies, the official story of 911. As I said earlier that even goes for members of the Commission.

They start off confidently enough, but once they begin to realise that all the 'facts' they think they know contradict the evidence and the eye-witness testimony their confidence begins to wane and they realise that there is something 'fishy' about what they have been told to think. They also realise, once they do some further reading and research that what they think they know also contradicts the sworn testimony given to the 911 Commission, Norman Mineta's timeline of the Pentagon attack? Building 7 not even being mentioned? etc Once they realise that they have simply swallowed the disinfo fed to them by the Mainline Media they start to ask their own questions. This was my experience too, so I know that it happens.

We are all aware just how much has been shaped by 911, so if it seems we have not been given the truth in any way, as even 2 of the Report's authors do, don't you think this event needs to be re-examined? As we slide further and further into this depression, from the people who brought you 9/11, more and more people are connecting the dots, and one day it will all make perfect sense to everyone! I think once the economy collapses it is going to make a lot of people question things a LOT more!

As I say there really aren't enough hours in the day for this, I don't really have time to analyse every single point made in this fruitless exchange. However, so we can all see who has the most reliable information how about we all agree to make some predictions, based upon our perception of the truth, and then we can all speak in 6 months? It might be a start in ascertaining who is 'credible' and who is not!

[trish]

No, we more than disagree. You are wrong. The "implication" to which you jumped was about my belief. You are simply wrong to assert that I believed that you subscribe to the conspiracy that Bush was behind the Twin Tower Tragedy.


Yes, I do recall what you said about philosophy, but you are wrong again. Many of my colleagues are philosophers and they are very much interested in saying exactly what they mean, and they usually mean what they say(for hippiefried let me add they are hardly ever accurate, just precise). If Schopenhauer is an exception, and is known rather for his imprecision, why on Earth would you quote him in a post in which you are attempting to establish the credibility of the websites you habituate?

Once again you demonstrate an inability to read and comprehend. Did I make allegations about your credibility? I believe I merely raised some questions. But keep talking, you are well on your way to answering them.

[daveskarety]

No, we more than disagree. You are wrong. The "implication" to which you jumped was about my belief. You are simply wrong to assert that I believed that you subscribe to the conspiracy that Bush was behind the Twin Tower Tragedy.


Yes, I do recall what you said about philosophy, but you are wrong again. Many of my colleagues are philosophers and they are very much interested in saying exactly what they mean, and they usually mean what they say(for hippiefried let me add they are hardly ever accurate, just precise). If Schopenhauer is an exception, and is known rather for his imprecision, why on Earth would you quote him in a post in which you are attempting to establish the credibility of the websites you habituate?

Once again you demonstrate an inability to read and comprehend. Did I make allegations about your credibility? I believe I merely raised some questions. But keep talking, you are well on your way to answering them.


YAWN!!

[chefmike]

Hey Chef Mike,

Finally made the big time with a dedicated thread that you didn't even have to start yourself? Wow! Don't let it go to your head. Consider the source.

Don't let the bouillabaisse boil over.

LMAO hippifried...not so fast...if you cast your eyes to the bottom of the page you'll see that this isn't the first time that I've been the target of lame attacks and smears here at HA..although admittedly I'm accustomed to casting my pearls of wisdom before a better caliber of swine than the handful of tinfoil touting tranny chasers that predictably scurried from this thread like roaches when a light was cast upon their lies...

And BTW hippi...I don't boil, I simmer... :wink:

[hippifried]

Wow Spud! You're famous.

Swine is just potential spam.

[daveskarety]

Tinfoil mentioned - check
'Funny' picture posted - check


admittedly I'm accustomed to casting my pearls of wisdom before a better caliber of swine than the handful of tinfoil touting tranny chasers that predictably scurried from this thread like roaches when a light was cast upon their lies...

'Tinfoil touting tranny chasers' not a bad stab at alliteration mate, seems like the evening classes in English are paying dividends! As for 'Pearls of Wisdom? HAAR!! Where? WHERE? I haven't read one single solitary word you have written which couldn't be described as juvenile name-calling drivel! You haven't even addressed ANYTHING I have raised, save for the usual condescending 'Oh you're not worth the bother' kinda comment! Which speaks volumes about your confidence in any argument you could bring to the debate! If you had written anything substantial maybe it could have been held up to scrutiny, but you're just bluster and mouth mate, with nothing in the line of solid fact-based opinion. Are these particular non-existent 'Pearls of Wisdom' you mention crafted from tinfoil too chef? It's amazing how you have said zip and are trying to convince us all that you have exposed us all as liars chef? When was this? When you called us 'Tinfoil (insert your own nonsense here)' chef? That's hardly conclusive rebuttal chef!

As for Tranny Chasers? Isn't every guy on this forum a 'Tranny Chaser'? Or did I miss a meeting? Mind you as I have been happily living with my TS Partner for years now my chasing days are over!! But oh you do make me larf!!! HAAAARR - Pearls of Wisdom!!!!! Pearl Necklace more like mate, splashed right across your tranny chasing face! When you're begging for dimes on the street cos no-one has the money to eat out you will soon start to question whether your Govt loves you or not, in the meantime keep your head firmly up your arse and keep taking the tablets! Leave the real hard work of changing things and campaigning and claiming back our govt, starting at the local level, to people like me! Watching the bouillabaisse simmer whilst sipping your Kool-Aid is by far an easier ride!

I ain't scurried away like a roach chef, I'm right here for ya chef, bring it on mate! The debate I mean, not the first course....

[trish]

Wow, chefmike, you really know how to push this guy's buttons.

[chefmike]

Wow, chefmike, you really know how to push this guy's buttons.

ROTFLMAO trish...all you have to do is rattle a little tinfoil at these Kaczynski wannabees to get 'em gnashing their teeth and raving incoherently about the latest nonsense they just read at infowars aka idiotwars, or better yet get them posting links to David Icke of the reptilian bloodline theories...why can't people take these patriots seriously? :roll:

[Quinn]

Wow, chefmike, you really know how to push this guy's buttons.

Indeed. I could be wrong, but I'm starting to get the sneaking suspicion that he just might have a bit of a problem with the good chef. :lol:

-Quinn

[chefmike]

Wow, chefmike, you really know how to push this guy's buttons.

Indeed. I could be wrong, but I'm starting to get the sneaking suspicion that he just might have a bit of a problem with the good chef. :lol:

-Quinn

LMAO, Quinn...it's good to see that you're still alive and well...nothing new here(except for the latest crop of village idiots as you can certainly see)...are you still a trader in this crazy market(no not HA lol) or are you taking a breather?

[El Nino]

Nice attempt at changing the course of the thread chef... you didn't address Dave's or my questions to you... The pattern is now obvious

[Quinn]

Wow, chefmike, you really know how to push this guy's buttons.

Indeed. I could be wrong, but I'm starting to get the sneaking suspicion that he just might have a bit of a problem with the good chef. :lol:

-Quinn

LMAO, Quinn...it's good to see that you're still alive and well...nothing new here(except for the latest crop of village idiots as you can certainly see)...are you still a trader in this crazy market(no not HA lol) or are you taking a breather?

Yeah, they're a bit like weeds: you get rid of them all, and new ones grow back. And, yes, I'm still actively trading, though not nearly as many hours as I was (I've been routinely skipping most of the Tokyo and 1st half of the London sessions). The markets are beyond crazy, but short-selling and range-trading opportunities abound, so this whole downturn has worked out quite well for me thus far (the future clearly holds no guarantees though).

-Quinn



-Quinn

[daveskarety]

Yup El Nino nailed it, as I predicted 5 pages ago, none of you have anything at all to rebutt what I say and have proved that you are unable to engage in debate, which is sad. And now you continue to try to misdirect us from your obvious lack of information by attempting to derail the thread. First attempt from Trish who tried gallantly to turn it into a discourse on the interpretation of Philosophy, on the advice of her 'colleagues' Plato, Heidegger and Nietzsche apparently! Better luck next time mate! And now we get Trish and Quinn attempting to turn it into a 'Dave hates Chef' thread! YAWN!! Who gives a shit what chef or I think of each other or vice versa in such serious times!! Stoopid Sheeple!

I am happy to report that my buttons remain unpushed and my feathers unruffled, it's water off a duck's back to me mate! None of you have any answers and you have proved you hold no fact-based opinions! I truly feel sorry for you, even though I'm sure you ignorantly pity me. Nevertheless I beg you to do some research into the truth while you still have time! Despite the juvenile discourse we all indulge in on here I really do love humans and humanity which, whether you like it or not, means I love all of you too! When I say the following I mean it as advice to all my brothers and sisters, in order that we all get through whatever Tyranny they have planned for us next. As the economy continues to contract and the truth of what is occurring becomes even more apparent I think some of you will even find yourselves agreeing with me more!

Information will be your greatest ally in the years ahead, and only if you educate yourself and keep up to date with what is really happening in the world, instead of simply swallowing the official line peddled by the corporate-owned media, will you find it possible to get by. I truly believe that! Anyway, I think it's time I departed this thread and did something more constructive with my time than just having circular conversations which lead nowhere! I know you will snigger and continue to ridicule any advice I have given here, but I give it simply because I care, which is more than you guys do! I don't see the point in my responding to any further insults or juvenile remarks as it simply creates more negativity, which is of no benefit to any of us.

Stay educated and informed, Love n Peace, Dave

[trish]

I truly believe that!

True Belief. True Believer. That's real critical thinking.
Bye-bye. Peace and love. Hallowed be thine name, and all that razz-ma-tazz.

[chefmike]

Wow, chefmike, you really know how to push this guy's buttons.

Indeed. I could be wrong, but I'm starting to get the sneaking suspicion that he just might have a bit of a problem with the good chef. :lol:

-Quinn

LMAO, Quinn...it's good to see that you're still alive and well...nothing new here(except for the latest crop of village idiots as you can certainly see)...are you still a trader in this crazy market(no not HA lol) or are you taking a breather?

Yeah, they're a bit like weeds: you get rid of them all, and new ones grow back. -Quinn


Isn't that the truth, Quinn...lately I could swear that HA's own infamous nutjob Jamie Michelle must've spawned some sort of hellishly annoying offspring and cursed HA with their presence, what with the tinfoil wearing tranny chasers we got here now interrupting every other thread with their ridiculous conspiracy spam...and what never fails to amuse and fascinate me is their maniacal frustration when their nonsense is of course ignored, dismissed and/or derided en masse whenever it's posted... :lol:

[yodajazz]

I know I should not say this, but this thread seems a little gay to me. I mean with people saying things like; "I wonder if ChefMike, come up with his crazy views, while he is in the shower, with soap suds running down his musclular body. And as the steam rise ..." You get what I mean?

[chefmike]

I know I should not say this, but this thread seems a little gay to me. I mean with people saying things like; "I wonder if ChefMike, come up with his crazy views, while he is in the shower, with soap suds running down his musclular body...." You get what I mean?

ROTFLMAFO...I know what you mean, yoda...sometimes all the adoration can be a bit of a burden...and all of the neverending fan mail...don't get me started...it's almost a relief sometimes when I also get the inevitible hate mail, death threats, and tinfoil voodoo dolls from the disgruntled Kaczynski types sitting way up there in the in the cheap seats...

BTW...if anyone is looking for the mentally challenged OP(although I can't imagine why unless you happen to be his PO) he was busy making a total fool of himself in yet another HIV thread...there's a shocker...
http://www.hungangels.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=42472

[chefmike]

From my thread on Alex Jones, hero of feeble-minded chicken littles like thxtinfoil and El Ninny:



El Nino: Mike has NO proof. His only job here is to shout insults and denigrate people. What a way to earn cigarette money! No ethics, no brains.

You are a fool and a laughingstock like your buddy El Ninny. The loony links that you two clowns post are quickly debunked, derided, and dismissed by anyone who bothers to read such nonsense.

You'll even stoop to outright lies when your conspiracy fantasies aren't working:
http://www.hungangels.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=42192&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30



Mike has yet to refute anything coming from a reputable source posted here.Reliable source? LMAO. This from the buffoon who said Ted Turner was a paid disinformationalist for the NWO. You mean to say that you and your handful of fellow laughingstocks have ever posted anything but absurd BS from the likes of Alex Jones et al? I wonder if anyone ever noticed it. Not bloody likely, simpleton.


He's the same guy that said 2 years ago the economy was in great shape.

Note the date thx registered on this site. More fantasy from the acorn academy alumnus. Produce a quote and URL, slick.

That's what I thought.

You clowns are pathetic.

[ezed]

Hello boys & girls -
Just popping in. Seems like there's a food fight going on! Fuck! after a month's worth of posts to review it good to see that the old timers are still alive and well. What the fuck was this thread about? I've already forgot!

Been a hard year, finally there's a light on the horizon. Lost a lot, but finally on the comeback trail. Man this has been shitty times. But things are looking up. Quinn, Chef Mike, Oli, especially Trish - good to see ya talking. I'll be in and out!

You know it's funny coming back and seeing the passionate typists, and imagining them sitting at their computers typing long winded diatribes! Spittle trailing from their mouth!

Well on to the rest of the posts to see what's been happening.

Oh well

[trish]

Hi ezed. Good to have you back. OOOOXXXX

[chefmike]

Hello boys & girls -
Just popping in. Seems like there's a food fight going on! Fuck! after a month's worth of posts to review it good to see that the old timers are still alive and well. What the fuck was this thread about? I've already forgot!

Been a hard year, finally there's a light on the horizon. Lost a lot, but finally on the comeback trail. Man this has been shitty times. But things are looking up. Quinn, Chef Mike, Oli, especially Trish - good to see ya talking. I'll be in and out!

You know it's funny coming back and seeing the passionate typists, and imagining them sitting at their computers typing long winded diatribes! Spittle trailing from their mouth!

Well on to the rest of the posts to see what's been happening.

Oh well

Yo Ezed!!

[chefmike]

From the same thread...Oli schooling the tranny chasers wearing the tinfiol tiaras...



Mike has yet to refute anything coming from a reputable source posted here. The reason is he can't. He's the same guy that said 2 years ago the economy was in great shape. He hangs out here because he's paid to. Site management feels a need a to have a clown to shake things up from time to time. Mike fits the bill perfectly. He's a good name caller but has the intellectual capacity of a flea.

Hey mate, these are some of what you consider 'reputable sources'. Most intelligent people consider these sites on par with http://weeklyworldnews.com/


more:http://www.roguegovernment.com/The_Reality_Of_FEMA_Camps_And_The_Martial_Law_Appa rtus/14096/0/13/13/Y/M.html



http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2009/cbarchive_20090127.html



sponsor of world terrorism http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/2008/12/us-army-document-that-proves-us-is.html


http://www.prisonplanet.com/cynthia-mckinney-prevented-from-leaving-us.html

So, by all means continue to believe your not the Luddite in this conversation...and that applies to El Nino also.

[chefmike]

Oops wrong thread...

[El Nino]

surrrre

[q1a2z3]

chefmike is just another form of entertainment - just like trish and the hippy

[trish]

Funny, you don't seem to be entertained. You're always yelling, shouting and all in a rage by the entertaining things we say. I think you're lying. You know God doesn't like when you lie. You actually find us rather intimidating. Admit it, you cutsey little dinky dick. God's listening.

[trish]

dp

[q1a2z3]

I laugh so hard at you guys I get cramps!!! Just because I enjoy the humor of the Eric Cartman character, I can imagine him saying my posts. You guys are so blind its great!

[Rogers]

I laugh so hard at you guys I get cramps!!! Just because I enjoy the humor of the Eric Cartman character, I can imagine him saying my posts. You guys are so blind its great!

Most people are laughing AT Cartman, not with him. That's why he doesn't have any real friends. Of course, someone lacking even a basic level of intelligence, like yourself, doesn't get the real genius behind S.P..

Butters: Fuck him up, Wendy!
[Cartman finally tosses Wendy off him and throws a punch at her, but she punches faster, making him miss. She then punches him on the right temple, and Cartman wobbles a bit. As he recovers, Wendy delivers the finishing blow: a fierce right cross that turns Cartman's head around and sends his body flying. The scene is frozen in time and the various reactions are shown: Stan, Kyle, Tweek, and Jimmy are cheering Wendy on. Jimmy has his right crutch up in the air. Butters is swooning while the boys around him just watch the fight. The camera speeds up and Cartman falls to the ground, losing a tooth. Wendy kicks him a few times for good measure. She runs out of strength, staggers backwards, and drops down on her ass, exhausted.]
Mr. Mackey: [just arriving] Wendy?
Wendy: [catches her breath and finally looks back at Mr. Mackey] I'm finished! [gets up and walks away. The girls look at her with astonishment]
Mr. Mackey: Eh somebod - somebody call the principal! [Cartman gets up, sniffling. Some of the kids begin to leave. Cartman looks around]
Cartman: [demoralized] You don't have to say anything. I know how it is. I'm no longer the cool kid. Now you all think I'm a fahahahahahag. My school life is over 'cause now all the guys don't think I'm coooohoohoohoohoohooooool. [wails some more]
[b]Stan: Dude, we never thought you were cool.
Cartman: That's not true. You're just saying that.
Kyle: No, really. We've always thought you suck.
Jimmy: Yeah, nothing's changed. Our opinion of you can't possible go any lower.
Cartman: You're all just saying that to make me feel better.
Craig: No, it's true. We've always hated you.
Butters: Wuyeah.
Cartman: Don't try and make me feel better, you guys, it isn't... Wait, wait a minute. Why would you guys be saying stuff to make me feel better? Unless... unless you do think I'm cool. [the guys look at each other, sure that Cartman misunderstood them]
Craig: What?
Cartman: [seeing a positive side to this somehow] If you're all trying to make me feel better, then you must still like me. Oh, oh phew! Oh, you had me so worried about what you guys were gonna think of me getting beat up by a girl and... it turns out you think I'm cool no matter what. Oh, oh, oh God, what a relief! [jumps up and clicks his feet up in the air] Oh, yay! [jumps up again]
http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/188250

[buckjohnson]

I have read some of ChefMikes previous posts. His stipulations and observations are often proven later to be incorrect and his "sources" often do not completly back up his reasoning. Sometimes a careful reading of his "sources" often directly contradict his postings.

That said, I admire his willingness to take a stand on issues.

[chefmike]

I have read some of ChefMikes previous posts. His stipulations and observations are often proven later to be incorrect and his "sources" often do not completly back up his reasoning. Sometimes a careful reading of his "sources" often directly contradict his postings.

Care to be more specific?

Even remotely?

Perhaps some examples/links and your erudite opinions re how "His stipulations and observations are often proven later to be incorrect and his "sources" often do not completly back up his reasoning...."

So while we're waiting for you to provide some facts as opposed to fantasy Beavis, er Buck....

Let's cut to the chase, pilgrim.

You bumped a thread and stuck your know-nothing noob nose where it didn't belong....in the general discussion area...to wit, nitwit:
http://www.hungangels.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=47690&start=120

As a result of your obnoxious, unwarranted, and ill-informed intrusion into an already insufferably idiotic thread(which predictably backfired on the OP) I was understandably compelled to inform you of what a clueless jackass that you are....so here we are again.... dipshit...go rack up your numbnut noob post count elsewhere...because you're boring me, beavis...

[buckjohnson]

Mike:

I am not a "threadhound" so enlighten me on some of you inside the beltway words. While you are at it, since I am not an adolescent anymore and I grew out of juvenile name calling, and in a polite society and conversation, folks should know what lang the other person is speaking, I ask for some clarification. What is a "bump” and "numbnut noob"?

[buckjohnson]

Mike:

As a result of your obnoxious, unwarranted, and ill-informed intrusion into an already insufferably idiotic thread(which predictably backfired on the OP

I agree that the thread backfired on the orig poster. However I am hardly ill-informed and commenting on a open forum is hardly can harly be called "intrusion". Please reread what I posted. A sane and honest re-reading can only come up with the conclusion that it was not an intrusion nor ill-informed.

[chefmike]

I have read some of ChefMikes previous posts. His stipulations and observations are often proven later to be incorrect and his "sources" often do not completly back up his reasoning. Sometimes a careful reading of his "sources" often directly contradict his postings.

Examples?

Perhaps something from you besides the kind of subjective and baseless BS that I just quoted....

[hippifried]

The cook's on the rampage.
Watch out for the rolling pin.

[buckjohnson]

Mike,

Are you that arrogant that you are stating you never been wrong?

Listen cat, I am not that kind of person, showing up folks in public. But I was first drawn to this forum by a posting by you..that was incorrect.

Do you really want me to call you out?

[chefmike]

Mike,

Are you that arrogant that you are stating you never been wrong?

Listen cat, I am not that kind of person, showing up folks in public. But I was first drawn to this forum by a posting by you..that was incorrect.

Do you really want me to call you out?

WTF?

Where did I say that I've NEVER been wrong? I suggest you re-read your statement and my reply, slick.

And you're gonna call me out?

LMFAO....BRING IT don't sing it, choirboy!