Swiftboating part deux

[chefmike]

Now there's a shocker...

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11263.html

[El Nino]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kFrFIFizkU

"YES WE CAN"?.... sure buddy. What a fucking joke and globalist corporate whore he REALLY is.

[trish]

The clip you link doesn't sufficiently identify which troop involvement is being discussed or when the conversation took place. Many people, for example, agree that we still have a lot of legitimate work to do in Afghanistan in the way of building Schools, hospitals and infrastructure. Can you clarify whether the question being addressed concerned Iraq or Afghanistan?

[El Nino]

Please Trish. You don't understand the true function of our occupations/invasions, do you? I will not even honor your semantically driven question with a response, other than say, Does it even matter, when or what particular soldiers or invasion he is speaking of? Get my drift???????????????????

[thx1138]

The US/UK has lost the strategic reason for the Afghanistan occupation. In the very near future India will sign a pact with Iran for delivery of natural gas thus rendering irrelevant the alternative pipeline route from Tajikistan across Afghanistan. I will post the link when I can find it.

[thx1138]

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/stockbauer1.html

[thx1138]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/18/AR2008061803035_pf.html

[trish]

It was a polite request to answer a simple question. Semantics is the connection between words and their meaning. Sorry my question was semantically driven. I thought you were making a point with some logic or reason behind it. Obviously not.

[chefmike]

It was a polite request to answer a simple question. Semantics is the connection between words and their meaning. Sorry my question was semantically driven. I thought you were making a point with some logic or reason behind it. Obviously not.

Now there's another shocker.... :roll:

[chefmike]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kFrFIFizkU

"YES WE CAN"?.... sure buddy. What a fucking joke and globalist corporate whore he REALLY is.

Still can't get over the fact that your creepy savior of the lunatic fringe Ron Paul was soundly defeated and also rightfully branded as an irrelevant crackpot, huh?

Much like yourself...

[El Nino]

Yeah whatevs chefmike, you miserable pile of pig vomit. This is not about Ron Paul. However, that dude IS straight up Founding Father material and a great fucking American. That being said, it is about Obama's political bullshit, double speak, false promises, empty rhetoric, war mongering and globalist whoring. Wake up from your Fox News induced slumber. The elite strive to set up a left Vs. right false paradigm to blind you from your slavery, which respectively is a top Vs. bottom paradigm...
Obama is a liar, you're thoughts are not your own, and the emperor wears no clothes...

Humor us and watch this video, and don't forget to slap on your tinfoil hat.

http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/

By the way chefmike, how long have you been working in "intelligence" agencies?

Don't forget to watch the film.

[El Nino]

Trish, your question had no true meaning, hence the reference. The answer is broad and crystal clear. He offers no true change. Wait and see. He takes his orders and doesn't make them. He can give an semi-articulate speech, that's all he can do. Your savior Obama stands for virtually the same foreign policies as all the neo-con think tanks. Neo-libs=neo-cons. He doesn't seem to understand what invasion does and the always repeating and subsequent blowback effect it has on our Country. The founding Fathers strived for a humble foreign policy. He doesn't stand for the Republic. Do your homework before you support somebody, look at his circle of insiders, advisors etc. They are anti American and pro New World Order.
Google, Brezinski-Obama, then Brezinski-Bilderberg Group. Wake up from the matrix. It will be for your own good.

And You know what Trish, I get the hunch that if Obama wasn't 25% black, you wouldn't be nearly as supportive as you are about the lying SOB.

[chefmike]

LMFAO...sounds like someone has their panties in a bunch.

Ron Paul?

He's no Ross Perot. :roll: :lol:

[El Nino]

Don't listen to Chefmike. He is a mainstream media mouthpiece here to make sure we bahave like good sheep and keep our thoughts inside the box. Giving up civil liberties and constitutional rights to combat terrorism is goooood, right chef?

[chefmike]

LMFAO...yep, that's what I'm all about...what an amazing sleuth you are, El Ninny... :roll: :screwy

[dafame]

Please Trish. You don't understand the true function of our occupations/invasions, do you? I will not even honor your semantically driven question with a response, other than say, Does it even matter, when or what particular soldiers or invasion he is speaking of? Get my drift???????????????????

Trish this guy is an idiot. You have to learn to just allow some people to do what they do and just be oblivious to it. El Nino is a guy that thinks he knows more than everyone about everything. He'll go against anything just to have something to say that seems intelligent. Just allow him to feel like a big man. This forum is probably his only outlet.

[trish]

Let’s see. El Nino claims my questions, (in pink below)



The clip you link doesn't sufficiently identify which troop involvement is being discussed or when the conversation took place… Can you clarify whether the question being addressed concerned Iraq or Afghanistan?

have “no true meaning.”

They are simple questions.

In the linked clip, were they discussing withdrawal of troops from Iraq, Afghanistan and or none of the above?

When did the conversation (in the linked clip) take place?

Those questions are not ill-defined. The information they request is clear to everyone except apparently El Nino. But I'm being unfair. El Nino doesn't find them meaningless because he doesn't understand them. Rather, El Nino doesn’t want us to be distracted by details. No. We must look at the big picture. A picture to which he and very few others are privy, because only he knows where they hide “true meaning” on the internet. El Nino can’t be bothered with simple ignoramuses who don’t understand “the true function” of our occupations in the Middle East. His flaccid mind is inadequate to understand the details and the complexities of the world and he is reduced to grasping at broad pictures that depict easy to understand mind candy like international conspiracies of secret organizations. He can only understand TRUE meaning and TRUE function because boiling things down to the TRUE perspective makes things TRULY SIMPLE.

The functions (there are many and not just one true function) of our occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq are complex and multifaceted, reflecting in part the interests of all the parties involved. It’s clear that the power that will next reside in the White House won’t get to completely change the momentum of world events. But it will have the opportunity to change the balance of those interests that have a voice and a vote in our decision making processes. This includes the opportunity to shift the functional nature of our involvement in the Middle East. El Nino has offered no evidence that Obama will continue in the vein of George Bush. Indeed, there is every indication that Obama will honor and not attenuate our voices as did Bush through lies and deception.

[El Nino]

The answer to 1984 is 1776

[chefmike]

I'm finished here

Promise?

[thx1138]

http://www.forbes.com/finance/2008/06/23/crude-biderman-margin-pf-etf-in_tt_0623trimtabs_inl.html I know, I know: the people at Forbes work for Alex Jones.

[Oli]

I'm finished here

Be a man and keep your word.

Your 'theories' on 9/11 do a disservice to the memory of the 3000 + victims in New York, the firefighters and police officers, and the personnel who died in the Pentagon.

BTW- Embracing every crackpot theory that come down the pike is stupidity, not patriotism.

[hippifried]

http://www.forbes.com/finance/2008/06/23/crude-biderman-margin-pf-etf-in_tt_0623trimtabs_inl.html I know, I know: the people at Forbes work for Alex Jones.
Worse! They work for Steve Forbes.

[chefmike]

http://www.forbes.com/finance/2008/06/23/crude-biderman-margin-pf-etf-in_tt_0623trimtabs_inl.html I know, I know: the people at Forbes work for Alex Jones.
Worse! They work for Steve Forbes.

LMAO...now we're getting somewhere...methinks that a conspiracy is afoot... :roll:

[hippifried]

THE DWEEBS ARE COMING!!!!!!!

Duck & cover!