Tgirl cocks - question...

[tstv_lover]

There seem to be no end of threads on here with guys worshiping tgirl cocks.

Am I the only one that really doesn't care too much about tgirl cock?

Oh sure I'll suck and stroke a tgirl cock as foreplay and to help her reach climax, but I don't care about length or shape or girth because I'm 100% top and not interested changing that.

I'm far more interested in what's between a girls ears than what's between her legs.

I understand that the guys here cover a wide range and this is certainly not intended as criticism, but are there others who don't care about tgirl cock?

[dan_drade]

I think you are the only one. ;)

[sucka4chix]

There seem to be no end of threads on here with guys worshiping tgirl cocks.

Am I the only one that really doesn't care too much about tgirl cock?

Oh sure I'll suck and stroke a tgirl cock as foreplay and to help her reach climax, but I don't care about length or shape or girth because I'm 100% top and not interested changing that.

I'm far more interested in what's between a girls ears than what's between her legs.

I understand that the guys here cover a wide range and this is certainly not intended as criticism, but are there others who don't care about tgirl cock?
This has been discussed ad nauseam. However I find it incredibly funny that you don't like cock, but will suck one! Perhaps you need to take a moment and do some soul searching.

[sucka4chix]

Double post monster's been here!

[Alyssa87]

i replied to this exact post in another thread
..but i guess its worth saying it again.
(i know what you mean)


but on the other end though, guys who want me to hide it while he fucks me, or refuses to take me 'there'--> :jerkoff
is just as bad as a bitchbottom.

[hwbs]

these threads make me laugh

[Alyssa87]

these threads make me laugh

as much as the posts praising big dick football players with clown makeup
...calling them beauties?

[hwbs]

at least they aren't being deceptive....they just need their eyes examined ,lmfao.....

[yodajazz]

There seem to be no end of threads on here with guys worshiping tgirl cocks.

Am I the only one that really doesn't care too much about tgirl cock?
.......


I think the key is "too much". Men can be so focused on that one thing they lose sight of the big picture. I have always found it erotic to know that the woman has one or had one, but I don't always have to see it. many times for me the sight of it spoils the feminine image. However some must not care that much about the size and shape or the 'Bulges' thread would not be at 154 pages.

[prettyboy]

some people are turned on by bleached blondes with silicon inflated 'breasts', rhinoplasty scarred faces and small cocks, some people are turned on by teenage boys with very large cocks and a femininity in their soul that makes them incredibly appealing even without the make up and props, some people are turned on by' truck drivers with tits' .
In this twilight world between Straight and Gay [ maybe we should call it Stray?] there are many different types of sexual beauty. Each of us will hopefully allow ourselves the freedom to find the right girl or man to take us to sexual ecstasy.
Some of my most memorable sexual experiences have been with girls that i would not have clicked twice on the internet.
I would think that most of the people on this board have suffered some form of embarrassment, harassment or humiliation, [ or fear of it,] because of their sexuality or the way they look. Maybe we should be more tolerant and less cunty , and most of all LESS HOMOPHOBIC.
For f@#ks sake, we all have an incredibly sensitive organ between our legs that is fun to play with, why are you denying yourselves? because of degrees of perceived Gayness? Are you the people who voted Bush back in after proving himself to be the worst President in history?
Sex is primal and animalistic , not reserved and inhibited, get down there and drink up the gravy,eat with your fingers and lick the plate clean.

[blacktgirls]

i replied to this exact post in another thread
..but i guess its worth saying it again.
(i know what you mean)


but on the other end though, guys who want me to hide it while he fucks me, or refuses to take me 'there'--> :jerkoff
is just as bad as a bitchbottom. i think the girls here are guilty of having a double standard. whenever one of the guys posts a dick pic and is well endowed all the girls mouths are watering and they post their praises but then they expect the guys not to drool over the girls big cocks.... whatsupwiddat......of course, the guys here are attracted to you girls cocks and love to touch them and suck them and then tap some of that backpussy but sometimes we might like you girls to bury the bone as well so don't be stingy...... P.S.,small cocks need luv too

[audrea_suicide]

i am a total bottom, i give awsome head, and i have only had one(1)cock in my hiney. i wouldnt really go for my date reaching for my unit, but if he is paying and a genuinely nice guy who i can trust with my safety, i MIGHT let him play with the dick. i really only enjoy giving blowjobs and having my butt played with. making out is awesum. but, i always state my "functionality status" with dates. all 3 ive had so far. thats why i keep a clean butt and mouth,those are my stong points. NOT MY COCK. rock on bitches...

[Alyssa87]

i replied to this exact post in another thread
..but i guess its worth saying it again.
(i know what you mean)


but on the other end though, guys who want me to hide it while he fucks me, or refuses to take me 'there'--> :jerkoff
is just as bad as a bitchbottom. i think the girls here are guilty of having a double standard. whenever one of the guys posts a dick pic and is well endowed all the girls mouths are watering and they post their praises but then they expect the guys not to drool over the girls big cocks.... whatsupwiddat......of course, the guys here are attracted to you girls cocks and love to touch them and suck them and then tap some of that backpussy but sometimes we might like you girls to bury the bone as well so don't be stingy...... P.S.,small cocks need luv too



good point. but im not one of those girls...am i?

[blacktgirls]

i replied to this exact post in another thread
..but i guess its worth saying it again.
(i know what you mean)


but on the other end though, guys who want me to hide it while he fucks me, or refuses to take me 'there'--> :jerkoff
is just as bad as a bitchbottom. i think the girls here are guilty of having a double standard. whenever one of the guys posts a dick pic and is well endowed all the girls mouths are watering and they post their praises but then they expect the guys not to drool over the girls big cocks.... whatsupwiddat......of course, the guys here are attracted to you girls cocks and love to touch them and suck them and then tap some of that backpussy but sometimes we might like you girls to bury the bone as well so don't be stingy...... P.S.,small cocks need luv too



good point. but im not one of those girls...am i?i agree with tstv_lover's point about taking an interest in a girl beyond just sex and if this is what you too were agreeing with than i just misunderstood. it sounded though like when you agreed ( i know what you mean ) that you were saying you also thought that the guys here were too focussed on cock and are therefore as you put it " bitch bottoms . " ...... this board is called hungangels because it's for guys who are attracted to beautiful girls who have cocks and want to do all the same things with the girls cocks that the girls want to do with the guys. if guys like tstv_lover don't really care about girls cocks then i think they are on the wrong board........i'm sorry, alyssa for singling you out and i think it's great that you jump in on the threads that mostly have only guys posting on them.p.s., i luv bitchbottom very much for sexy time

[tstv_lover]

Apologies to those pointing out this is a double post. I tried searching...obviously not well enough.

For those questioning the incongruity of not worshiping transsexual cocks but being prepared to suck and play on occasions - it all comes down to the girl.

One LTR I had with transsexual girl she just never wanted it touched or even mentioned - she didn't want SRS but hated being reminded. Another girl was bottom but liked being sucked.

My point is that you respect what someone likes and what they don't both in and out of bed.


i am a total bottom, i give awsome head, and i have only had one(1)cock in my hiney. i wouldnt really go for my date reaching for my unit, but if he is paying and a genuinely nice guy who i can trust with my safety, i MIGHT let him play with the dick. i really only enjoy giving blowjobs and having my butt played with. making out is awesum. but, i always state my "functionality status" with dates. all 3 ive had so far. thats why i keep a clean butt and mouth,those are my stong points. NOT MY COCK. rock on bitches...

Audea, you sound just perfect!

[Alyssa87]

i replied to this exact post in another thread
..but i guess its worth saying it again.
(i know what you mean)


but on the other end though, guys who want me to hide it while he fucks me, or refuses to take me 'there'--> :jerkoff
is just as bad as a bitchbottom. i think the girls here are guilty of having a double standard. whenever one of the guys posts a dick pic and is well endowed all the girls mouths are watering and they post their praises but then they expect the guys not to drool over the girls big cocks.... whatsupwiddat......of course, the guys here are attracted to you girls cocks and love to touch them and suck them and then tap some of that backpussy but sometimes we might like you girls to bury the bone as well so don't be stingy...... P.S.,small cocks need luv too



good point. but im not one of those girls...am i?i agree with tstv_lover's point about taking an interest in a girl beyond just sex and if this is what you too were agreeing with than i just misunderstood. it sounded though like when you agreed ( i know what you mean ) that you were saying you also thought that the guys here were too focussed on cock and are therefore as you put it " bitch bottoms . " ...... this board is called hungangels because it's for guys who are attracted to beautiful girls who have cocks and want to do all the same things with the girls cocks that the girls want to do with the guys. if guys like tstv_lover don't really care about girls cocks then i think they are on the wrong board........i'm sorry, alyssa for singling you out and i think it's great that you jump in on the threads that mostly have only guys posting on them.p.s., i luv bitchbottom very much for sexy time

Thats cool. i love jumping guys 8)

But no, thats not what i said at all.
The truth is that most girls (that i know) are truned off sexually when a guy is too cock hungry during sex and intimacy.
I dont think theres anything wrong with them being so, its just not sexy (to me).

However to be fair- 'cockhungry' is relative. sooo :shrug

[drock]

i replied to this exact post in another thread
..but i guess its worth saying it again.
(i know what you mean)


but on the other end though, guys who want me to hide it while he fucks me, or refuses to take me 'there'--> :jerkoff
is just as bad as a bitchbottom.

LOL so you run into guys who want you to hide it, but they have no problem fucking you??? I guess some of you ladies deal with a lot.. :lol:

[Alyssa87]

yea well some guys (unfamiliar w. ts's) are uncomfortable with the penis
...but theres no denying this bombshell

+
+
+

:thumbsdown kidding! im not that conceited. lol

[blacktgirls]

The truth is that most girls (that i know) are truned off sexually when a guy is too cock hungry during sex and intimacy.
I dont think theres anything wrong with them being so, its just not sexy (to me).

However to be fair- 'cockhungry' is relative. sooo :shrug say it ain't so Joe

[Alyssa87]

is that Joe DiMagio? (sp)

[drock]

yea well some guys (unfamiliar w. ts's) are uncomfortable with the penis
...but theres no denying this bombshell

+
+
+

:thumbsdown kidding! im not that conceited. lol

Well hell as fine as you are, most guys are gonna want to hit weather or not they're familar with ts's or not, but if I was a betting man i'd say that those who are pretending to not be familar really are unless they've been living under a rock.. Probably a small percentage really aren't... even so Alyssa I still say 9 times out of 10 if you give it up you're going to get fucked.. lol. 8)

[rocklob]

is that Joe DiMagio?

Nope, Shoeless Joe Jackson, of the Chicago Black Sox scandal of 1919.

And DiMaggio has two g's, since you were worried ;)

[tstv_lover]

this board is called hungangels because it's for guys who are attracted to beautiful girls who have cocks and want to do all the same things with the girls cocks that the girls want to do with the guys. if guys like tstv_lover don't really care about girls cocks then i think they are on the wrong board

Following that logic are post-op transsexuals also in the wrong place?

BTW, I've seen your posts elsewhere and agree with about 99% of your comments.

[tghtpussybitch]

i replied to this exact post in another thread
..but i guess its worth saying it again.
(i know what you mean)


but on the other end though, guys who want me to hide it while he fucks me, or refuses to take me 'there'--> :jerkoff
is just as bad as a bitchbottom. i think the girls here are guilty of having a double standard. whenever one of the guys posts a dick pic and is well endowed all the girls mouths are watering and they post their praises but then they expect the guys not to drool over the girls big cocks.... whatsupwiddat......of course, the guys here are attracted to you girls cocks and love to touch them and suck them and then tap some of that backpussy but sometimes we might like you girls to bury the bone as well so don't be stingy...... P.S.,small cocks need luv too



good point. but im not one of those girls...am i?i agree with tstv_lover's point about taking an interest in a girl beyond just sex and if this is what you too were agreeing with than i just misunderstood. it sounded though like when you agreed ( i know what you mean ) that you were saying you also thought that the guys here were too focussed on cock and are therefore as you put it " bitch bottoms . " ...... this board is called hungangels because it's for guys who are attracted to beautiful girls who have cocks and want to do all the same things with the girls cocks that the girls want to do with the guys. if guys like tstv_lover don't really care about girls cocks then i think they are on the wrong board........i'm sorry, alyssa for singling you out and i think it's great that you jump in on the threads that mostly have only guys posting on them.p.s., i luv bitchbottom very much for sexy time

I totally agree if you guys dont like a girls cock then you shouldn't be in ha or for that fact into shemales, and stating your 100%top is so stupid is that supposed to make you sound more straight your not more straight than the guy who's sucking a shemale cock

why is it tranny chasers suck trannies cocks swallow loads, get fuck in the ass and consider themselves straight come on sweetie, straight your not,,

inside joke trannies always laught when guys call ads or hit them up online and say is my first time and get on all four to get fucked and suck a mean cock lmao
ok ok back to the convo

why do chasers feel they are different than a gay guy that sucks cocks, swallows load and gets fuck.

is so pathetic that we live in a society that looks down on other walks of life. We put suppose straights in a pedestal. but who is straight ?

a. a men that has a wife and occasionally suck cock on the side like
exp: Mark Foley,

b. married men that go to shemale for the occasional bj and versatile play


(A straight men is attracted to the opposite sex 1. sex organ .2 secondary sex characteristics)

chasers are not straight since they are attracted to the secondary sex characteristics and same sex organ.. but who's here to point a finger just live your life,,

IF YOU CAN'T BEAT THEM JOIN THEM

[sucka4chix]

this board is called hungangels because it's for guys who are attracted to beautiful girls who have cocks and want to do all the same things with the girls cocks that the girls want to do with the guys. if guys like tstv_lover don't really care about girls cocks then i think they are on the wrong board

Following that logic are post-op transsexuals also in the wrong place?

BTW, I've seen your posts elsewhere and agree with about 99% of your comments.
Yup! Especially when they start hating on guys for liking pre-ops! Its so ironic. (moronic too)

[tghtpussybitch]

this board is called hungangels because it's for guys who are attracted to beautiful girls who have cocks and want to do all the same things with the girls cocks that the girls want to do with the guys. if guys like tstv_lover don't really care about girls cocks then i think they are on the wrong board

Following that logic are post-op transsexuals also in the wrong place?

BTW, I've seen your posts elsewhere and agree with about 99% of your comments.
Yup! Especially when they start hating on guys for liking pre-ops! Its so ironic. (moronic too)

is not that they are hating on guys who like pre ops is that tranny chasers claim to be straight but wont date a post op so why is she consider a then a transsexual when that word in other terms means COCK ,, Let post ops them evolved to their new female gender that is the reason they got a pussy stop treating the as a girl lacking a cock you don't like them thats fine ,, I'm sure they don't like tranny chasers if they did they would had stay with the cock. I'm not saying that post ops are not transexual they are but their sexual gender is female that's their anatomical sex thats their first label,, their second label is transsexuals,,

I always knew guys who like tranny,shemales, ladyboys w.e like cock,, so in order for post ops to move on they need their own admires and in order to get their own admires guys who like pussy they need to removed that post op label that stigmatizes them and called themselves new born females that way everyone is happy.

Another rule sweetie if you can't pass as a female why get a pussy come on don't make life harder for yourself, I don't know whats more gross a cross dresser or a new born femme that looks manly ewww groww pussy is the ultimate female status think you can carry it I don't think so..

I'm not saying don't get a pussy but if you got a football players back your huge like a men don't get a pussy.




((don't be greedy give to the needy))

[anonymoussonny]

This thread is full of interesting perspectives. I call myself straight, as I love the feminine form but the allure of the "shemale' is intoxicating. I won't bottom EVER or suck a penis EVER. I love to hold a woman in my arms and hold her for close intimacy. I will also drive thrust to the hilt while working to provide pleasure to my partner. I don't get off unless my lover is pleased to the point of ecstasy. Yes I am a people- pleaser but I draw the line at the stated points. That stated, I really enjoy HA. I was a lurker for years before finally having to register but I think it's good to see how diverse the sexuality is on this site.

Someone who loves to cuddle...
Thanks for letting me share...

[prettyboy]

I would think that a girl going through transition would rather be seen as a less than beautiful woman than as a man in drag. Do you think that only the beautiful should become post ops?
There are many many million GG women that are far from the' perfect' female shape. There are very few Tgirl women who are totally passable, even most of the girls that are endlessly drooled over on this board are not fooling anyone for long, maybe at a glance or after a few drinks. I'm not saying that they're not beautiful, just not really passable as GG

RE the 'chaser' label, which i hate, though i certainly fit the criteria. Maybe if we just embrace it as a label as the Gays did with Faggot and Queer , it will become less offensive.,At least it's better than being called Gay, which we all know that we are just a little bit, but not enough to really deserve the label.
I think most of us here are turned on by essentially the same thing, it is not just about the cock or the shape of the body or the ass or streetwalker dress sense, it's the energy that emanates from these ladies, it is both intoxicating and addictive. But i would bet that very few of us envisage a long term future with a post op . Possible, but unlikely. So we only get to enjoy their company for a few years as they pass through our lives as escorts, club friends , photos and personas to interact and masterbate to on the internet.

Something just occurred to me, i can't remember ever reading the word love, used in it's emotional romantic sense, on this board,. Just a thought.

[lazyman]

Certainly you are not alone, tstv_lover, although as you will have seen there are a number of people around here who will try and make you feel as if you are.

It's surprising to see how old-fashioned conservatism and sexual intolerence survives even in a place like this.

Of men who are attracted to transsexuals, probably a clear majority are "cock fans", in the sense that they are aroused by their partner's penis and wish to make use of it sexually. They're entitled to respect for their preferences.

What I don't understand, however, is why a small minority of those who fall into this category feel the need to be intolerant and sometimes downright psychologically abusive towards men like you and me whose attraction to transsexuals is not centred around the penis.

You might have thought that being able to accept and respect sexual orientations that you don't happen to share yourself would be second nature to those in a "niche" area like a transsexual forum. Sadly, for a minority of the "cock fans", that's a level of civilization and common courtesy that they haven't achieved yet.

So no, you're not the only one. Guys are into shemales for a whole variety of reasons, and nobody should pretend that theirs is the only true category.

[tstv_lover]

Certainly you are not alone, tstv_lover, although as you will have seen there are a number of people around here who will try and make you feel as if you are.

It's surprising to see how old-fashioned conservatism and sexual intolerence survives even in a place like this.

Of men who are attracted to transsexuals, probably a clear majority are "cock fans", in the sense that they are aroused by their partner's penis and wish to make use of it sexually. They're entitled to respect for their preferences.

What I don't understand, however, is why a small minority of those who fall into this category feel the need to be intolerant and sometimes downright psychologically abusive towards men like you and me whose attraction to transsexuals is not centred around the penis.

You might have thought that being able to accept and respect sexual orientations that you don't happen to share yourself would be second nature to those in a "niche" area like a transsexual forum. Sadly, for a minority of the "cock fans", that's a level of civilization and common courtesy that they haven't achieved yet.

So no, you're not the only one. Guys are into shemales for a whole variety of reasons, and nobody should pretend that theirs is the only true category.


Certainly you are not alone, tstv_lover, although as you will have seen there are a number of people around here who will try and make you feel as if you are.

It's surprising to see how old-fashioned conservatism and sexual intolerence survives even in a place like this.

Of men who are attracted to transsexuals, probably a clear majority are "cock fans", in the sense that they are aroused by their partner's penis and wish to make use of it sexually. They're entitled to respect for their preferences.

What I don't understand, however, is why a small minority of those who fall into this category feel the need to be intolerant and sometimes downright psychologically abusive towards men like you and me whose attraction to transsexuals is not centred around the penis.

You might have thought that being able to accept and respect sexual orientations that you don't happen to share yourself would be second nature to those in a "niche" area like a transsexual forum. Sadly, for a minority of the "cock fans", that's a level of civilization and common courtesy that they haven't achieved yet.

So no, you're not the only one. Guys are into shemales for a whole variety of reasons, and nobody should pretend that theirs is the only true category.

Thanks for your comments Lazyman. I had to laugh when I read statements like "if you guys dont like a girls cock then you shouldn't be in ha or for that fact into shemales".

The only transsexual girls I've been with wanted to be treated as female. One girl I lived with for 18 months did top when she had been an escort but was sexually very submissive in private. Alyssa summed this up when saying that "The truth is that most girls (that i know) are turned off sexually when a guy is too cock hungry during sex and intimacy."

I guess we're all different, which is healthy, but should welcome the wide diversity in our niche. I don't think any one of us is in a position to point the finger and say "I'm better than you".

Anyway, it's been fascinating to see the responses.

[JelenaCD]

I say the question to ask is if your tgal removed her COCK would you still want her and the answer for me is no , i would just prefer a genetic gal over her and that's why i say i am bisexual !

[tstv_lover]

I say the question to ask is if your tgal removed her COCK would you still want her and the answer for me is no , i would just prefer a genetic gal over her and that's why i say i am bisexual !

Interesting question Jelena - maybe worthy of it's own thread. If the tgirl I loved wanted SRS then I would absolutely support her both financially and emotionally. She would be the same person, progressed a step further on her journey and requiring reassurance that she'd made the right decision.

To end a relationship and discard a transsexual girlfriend because she decided to have SRS sounds incredibly selfish and hurtful.

[sucka4chix]

Certainly you are not alone, tstv_lover, although as you will have seen there are a number of people around here who will try and make you feel as if you are.

It's surprising to see how old-fashioned conservatism and sexual intolerence survives even in a place like this.

Of men who are attracted to transsexuals, probably a clear majority are "cock fans", in the sense that they are aroused by their partner's penis and wish to make use of it sexually. They're entitled to respect for their preferences.

What I don't understand, however, is why a small minority of those who fall into this category feel the need to be intolerant and sometimes downright psychologically abusive towards men like you and me whose attraction to transsexuals is not centred around the penis.

You might have thought that being able to accept and respect sexual orientations that you don't happen to share yourself would be second nature to those in a "niche" area like a transsexual forum. Sadly, for a minority of the "cock fans", that's a level of civilization and common courtesy that they haven't achieved yet.

So no, you're not the only one. Guys are into shemales for a whole variety of reasons, and nobody should pretend that theirs is the only true category.
ughhhhhh!!! I repeat UUUGGGGGHHHHHH! Damn I need a primal scream!
I'll try to explain this the billionth time, even though it needs no explaining!!
If you go to a site called HUNG ANGELS, YOU SHOULD EXPECT TO FIND PEOPLE THERE WHO LIKE ANGELS WHO ARE HUNG! DOES THAT MAKE SENSE!!! IT'S SORTA LIKE HOT CHOCOLATE- PUT THE 2 WORDS TOGETHER AND YOU CAN FIGURE OUT WHAT THE TERM MEANS. LET'S SEE ANGELS PROBABLY REFERS TO SWEET GIRLS, AND HUNG EITHER MEANS THEY KILLED THEMSELVES BY TYING A ROPE AROUND THEIR NECKS, OR THEY HAVE COCKS. NOT ONLY COCKS, BIG COCKS.THAT'S MY BEEF!
You can go to any site you want, but to go to a site with such a name, and then wonder why people there are cock-centric is FUCKING INSANE! Unless you have no clue about the english lanuage, quit complaining and wondering why a site called hung angels attracts guys who like hung angels, and start asking why a site called hung angels attracts guys who DON'T like hung angels and why so many girls who are against guys who like hung angels, would frequent a site called HUNG ANGELS!
It's like having a site called black angels but having people get upset because the guys like real black girls." I don't get off on the blackness of girls, I like the white girls who are in black face". Then don't go to the black angels site, you moron!
There are plenty of chicks without dicks! What kind of psychosis makes anyone purposely seek out a girl with a dick just to ignore it?! Just get a girl without a dick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Damn!

Ahhh. that felt good!

[lazyman]

Certainly you are not alone, tstv_lover, although as you will have seen there are a number of people around here who will try and make you feel as if you are.

It's surprising to see how old-fashioned conservatism and sexual intolerence survives even in a place like this.

Of men who are attracted to transsexuals, probably a clear majority are "cock fans", in the sense that they are aroused by their partner's penis and wish to make use of it sexually. They're entitled to respect for their preferences.

What I don't understand, however, is why a small minority of those who fall into this category feel the need to be intolerant and sometimes downright psychologically abusive towards men like you and me whose attraction to transsexuals is not centred around the penis.

You might have thought that being able to accept and respect sexual orientations that you don't happen to share yourself would be second nature to those in a "niche" area like a transsexual forum. Sadly, for a minority of the "cock fans", that's a level of civilization and common courtesy that they haven't achieved yet.

So no, you're not the only one. Guys are into shemales for a whole variety of reasons, and nobody should pretend that theirs is the only true category.
ughhhhhh!!! I repeat UUUGGGGGHHHHHH! Damn I need a primal scream!
I'll try to explain this the billionth time, even though it needs no explaining!!
If you go to a site called HUNG ANGELS, YOU SHOULD EXPECT TO FIND PEOPLE THERE WHO LIKE ANGELS WHO ARE HUNG! DOES THAT MAKE SENSE!!! IT'S SORTA LIKE HOT CHOCOLATE- PUT THE 2 WORDS TOGETHER AND YOU CAN FIGURE OUT WHAT THE TERM MEANS. LET'S SEE ANGELS PROBABLY REFERS TO SWEET GIRLS, AND HUNG EITHER MEANS THEY KILLED THEMSELVES BY TYING A ROPE AROUND THEIR NECKS, OR THEY HAVE COCKS. NOT ONLY COCKS, BIG COCKS.THAT'S MY BEEF!
You can go to any site you want, but to go to a site with such a name, and then wonder why people there are cock-centric is FUCKING INSANE! Unless you have no clue about the english lanuage, quit complaining and wondering why a site called hung angels attracts guys who like hung angels, and start asking why a site called hung angels attracts guys who DON'T like hung angels and why so many girls who are against guys who like hung angels, would frequent a site called HUNG ANGELS!
It's like having a site called black angels but having people get upset because the guys like real black girls." I don't get off on the blackness of girls, I like the white girls who are in black face". Then don't go to the black angels site, you moron!
There are plenty of chicks without dicks! What kind of psychosis makes anyone purposely seek out a girl with a dick just to ignore it?! Just get a girl without a dick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Damn!

Ahhh. that felt good!

Congratulations on your primal scream.

Now that you've got that out of the way, perhaps you could get to work on the next skill - actually reading posts.

The question was not about whether one would expect to find people on HA who are interested in cocks - of course you would expect that. The question was whether it was unusual to be on HA and not be interested in cocks. And the answer being that, while a minority, there are a group of guys who genuinely fall into that category, and shouldn't be labelled as "delusional", any more than the cock-fans should.

Any clearer?

Perhaps next time we can discuss why you seem to have some issues surrounding accepting other people's sexual orientation or tastes. Or perhaps that's none of my business.

[sucka4chix]

Certainly you are not alone, tstv_lover, although as you will have seen there are a number of people around here who will try and make you feel as if you are.

It's surprising to see how old-fashioned conservatism and sexual intolerence survives even in a place like this.

Of men who are attracted to transsexuals, probably a clear majority are "cock fans", in the sense that they are aroused by their partner's penis and wish to make use of it sexually. They're entitled to respect for their preferences.

What I don't understand, however, is why a small minority of those who fall into this category feel the need to be intolerant and sometimes downright psychologically abusive towards men like you and me whose attraction to transsexuals is not centred around the penis.

You might have thought that being able to accept and respect sexual orientations that you don't happen to share yourself would be second nature to those in a "niche" area like a transsexual forum. Sadly, for a minority of the "cock fans", that's a level of civilization and common courtesy that they haven't achieved yet.

So no, you're not the only one. Guys are into shemales for a whole variety of reasons, and nobody should pretend that theirs is the only true category.
ughhhhhh!!! I repeat UUUGGGGGHHHHHH! Damn I need a primal scream!
I'll try to explain this the billionth time, even though it needs no explaining!!
If you go to a site called HUNG ANGELS, YOU SHOULD EXPECT TO FIND PEOPLE THERE WHO LIKE ANGELS WHO ARE HUNG! DOES THAT MAKE SENSE!!! IT'S SORTA LIKE HOT CHOCOLATE- PUT THE 2 WORDS TOGETHER AND YOU CAN FIGURE OUT WHAT THE TERM MEANS. LET'S SEE ANGELS PROBABLY REFERS TO SWEET GIRLS, AND HUNG EITHER MEANS THEY KILLED THEMSELVES BY TYING A ROPE AROUND THEIR NECKS, OR THEY HAVE COCKS. NOT ONLY COCKS, BIG COCKS.THAT'S MY BEEF!
You can go to any site you want, but to go to a site with such a name, and then wonder why people there are cock-centric is FUCKING INSANE! Unless you have no clue about the english lanuage, quit complaining and wondering why a site called hung angels attracts guys who like hung angels, and start asking why a site called hung angels attracts guys who DON'T like hung angels and why so many girls who are against guys who like hung angels, would frequent a site called HUNG ANGELS!
It's like having a site called black angels but having people get upset because the guys like real black girls." I don't get off on the blackness of girls, I like the white girls who are in black face". Then don't go to the black angels site, you moron!
There are plenty of chicks without dicks! What kind of psychosis makes anyone purposely seek out a girl with a dick just to ignore it?! Just get a girl without a dick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Damn!

Ahhh. that felt good!

Congratulations on your primal scream.

Now that you've got that out of the way, perhaps you could get to work on the next skill - actually reading posts.

The question was not about whether one would expect to find people on HA who are interested in cocks - of course you would expect that. The question was whether it was unusual to be on HA and not be interested in cocks. And the answer being that, while a minority, there are a group of guys who genuinely fall into that category, and shouldn't be labelled as "delusional", any more than the cock-fans should.

Any clearer?

Perhaps next time we can discuss why you seem to have some issues surrounding accepting other people's sexual orientation or tastes. Or perhaps that's none of my business.
You truly are a lazyman---read my post next time before stepping to me. I stated what MY BEEF WAS! From my point of view, you should be labelled as delusional. Listen to this statement "I like transsexual women, but I don't like their cocks" say that outloud and tell me why that makes sense! It's no different than saying I like GGs but I ignore their pussies! Why put yourself thru the stress of dealing with something you don't like!
I could give less than a rats ass about anyones sexual orientation or tastes. IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT! IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH LOGIC. You have admitted yourself that you are in the MINORITY, which means yes, you are unusual!!! Stop taking that personally and learn the meaning of the words you use!!! That and only that has been my beef on this type of issue over and over. Words are important--- if you see the word hung, you know it sexually implies a being endowed with a big cock. So if you go to a site entitled hung angels, why ask if it is unusual to not like cocks? It logically follows that of course it is unusual!!
The word transsexual implies some who has crossed from one sex to another or straddles across 2 sexes. So to say I like transsexuals but I only like the feminine part is delusional and self defeating. Delusional because you know there's another side, and self defeating because you don't like penis, but chose a sexual creature that has one!
Hopefully, you can see how many people cannot understand this. I'm not hating on you! I'm hating on the fact that so many people don't understand why others don't follow their way of thinking WHEN THEIR TRAIN OF THOUGHT IS ILLOGICAL!!

[BeardedOne]

However I find it incredibly funny that you don't like cock, but will suck one!

To each their own. I'm not especially fond of psychotic women, but I'd do 'em if they had a big dowry. :wink:

[lazyman]

Oh dear. All right, let's try and get this straight one last time, shall we?


You truly are a lazyman---read my post next time before stepping to me. I stated what MY BEEF WAS! From my point of view, you should be labelled as delusional. Listen to this statement "I like transsexual women, but I don't like their cocks" say that outloud and tell me why that makes sense! It's no different than saying I like GGs but I ignore their pussies! Why put yourself thru the stress of dealing with something you don't like!

So I should be labelled as delusional? Why? Because YOU don't understand or share my sexual tastes? Forgive me if I don't see the logic there.

I don't share your tastes either, but I don't see fit to abuse you with terms like "delusional", because I have no more standing to do that to you than you do to me.

Now it may be that you find it surprising that there are a number of men who are sexually aroused by male-to-female transsexuals for reasons that do not revolve around the fact that they have a penis. That may confuse you, and you may be unable to relate to it. But that doesn't mean we don't exist, and it doesn't mean that you have a right to tell us that we're in the wrong place, any more than I have a right to tell that to you.

Try looking at it from the other perspective. What if someone tried to tell you that you were delusional for only liking cock when it was attached to a transsexual, rather than when it was a man's? Now if anyone did tell you that, they'd be wrong, wouldn't they? As wrong as you are to say it to us.


I could give less than a rats ass about anyones sexual orientation or tastes. IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT! IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH LOGIC. You have admitted yourself that you are in the MINORITY, which means yes, you are unusual!!! Stop taking that personally and learn the meaning of the words you use!!! That and only that has been my beef on this type of issue over and over. Words are important--- if you see the word hung, you know it sexually implies a being endowed with a big cock. So if you go to a site entitled hung angels, why ask if it is unusual to not like cocks? It logically follows that of course it is unusual!!

First of all, the gramatically correct phrase to use would be that you couldn't give a rat's ass, not that you could.

And secondly, doesn't it strike you as being a little incongrous to be claiming not to care, and then in the same post ranting at me with capital letters, multiple exclamation marks and the word "delusional?"

I agree that we're in a minority, however, that does not equate to being unusual. In fact we would appear to be quite a substantial minority, albeit one that does not compete with the cock-fans for vocality or visibility. As evidence for this, look at the proportion of transsexual porn that is taken up with the girls in a passive role in which their cock is not used at all - it's massive! Porn producers know their audience - if they didn't, they'd have gone bust by now - and they know that there are a significant number of men who are turned on by transsexuals because of what they are, not what they have between their legs.

The final implication of yours seems to be that, as a member of the above-identified category, I should be less at home on HA than you. That's just weird. This site does not exist just to cater for your tastes, any more than it does for mine. And you don't have to read too much of this forum to realise that quite a lot of its members are not cock-fans like your good self.


The word transsexual implies some who has crossed from one sex to another or straddles across 2 sexes. So to say I like transsexuals but I only like the feminine part is delusional and self defeating. Delusional because you know there's another side, and self defeating because you don't like penis, but chose a sexual creature that has one!
Hopefully, you can see how many people cannot understand this. I'm not hating on you! I'm hating on the fact that so many people don't understand why others don't follow their way of thinking WHEN THEIR TRAIN OF THOUGHT IS ILLOGICAL!!

Absolutely, I can see how some people would not understand this. Indeed, it's painfully obvious that you can't! But then, I've never asked you to understand. All I've asked is that you give me and those like me the same modicum of respect that I've given you by accepting our genuine views and desires without trying to impose yours on us and make us fit into your image of what a transsexual fan should be. After all, how would you like it if someone did that to you?

If you are interested in trying to understand how people can be turned on by transsexuals without being cock-fans, this is how I approached the subject last time it came up:


So, why am I attracted to transsexuals if I'm not interested in their penises? This is an interesting question, and one which would have been valid for you to ask had you done so in a spirit of genuine curiosity rather than demonstrating a determination to pre-judge and/or reject the answer.

The reasons I can basically summarise as follows: transsexual women look, act, and in the best cases sound, like genetic women without actually being so. Thus, they permit me to indulge my sexual attraction to women while simultaneously bringing a new range of sensual and interpersonal offerings that genetic women can't provide. These are:

1) created femininity. A transsexual woman in the later stages of transition is a work of art and a testament to a lifetime of aesthetic improvement. As the sexual partner of such a person, I feel almost as if this vast effort has been for my benefit and enjoyment. Making love to a transsexual woman carries some of the same thrill as driving a superbly-engineered car or owning a painting that took years to finish.

2) empathy. A transsexual woman has a better and more natural understanding of the male mind and sex drive than a genetic woman. Typically they have spent a significant portion of their formative childhood living in a male gender role before embarking on the course of actualising their true selves. The additional understanding this brings to them enhances sex, since I feel we are better able to appreciate one another's desires and needs. To give an example of this on a trivial level, in my experience no genetic woman has ever been able to give a blowjob to rival those provided by transsexual women.

3) Transgressive appeal - Being attracted to and having sexual relations with transsexual women is outside the normal range of sexual behaviour. Despite the increasing prominence given to it by the internet, it is still very much a niche, minority interest. It allows me to experience the excitement of going beyond the boundaries of what my family and community would find acceptable, while still allowing me to have sex with attractive women.

So there you go, as best I'm able to understand it. The above is what draws me personally to transsexuals. As for your reasons, or anyone else's, that's not for me to preach about or judge - a position you could do well to adopt.

So as I hope you can see, we do have our reasons. If our sexual tastes offend or confuse you, or if you can't see the logic in them, then I'm afraid that's too bad. You'll just have to do what most of the civilised world has been doing for over 40 years and accept people for what they are, not for what you think they should be.

[sucka4chix]

that's not for me to preach about or judge - a position you could do well to adopt.

So as I hope you can see, we do have our reasons. If our sexual tastes offend or confuse you, or if you can't see the logic in them, then I'm afraid that's too bad. You'll just have to do what most of the civilised world has been doing for over 40 years and accept people for what they are, not for what you think they should be.
I accept you for what you are--- an idiot who refuses to read, even when he pastes my comments directly into his response. You attempt to correct something you mistakenly call grammar, yet you don't even quote the statement that you pasted!! That tells me you either aren't reading, have ADD, are a moron, or simply want to spread your own silly-assed agenda regardless. Once again, your ridiculously long winded response has absolutely nothing to do with what I said, but I won't give it value by trying to explain where you went wrong. Obviously it's above your level of comprehension.

[tstv_lover]

So, why am I attracted to transsexuals if I'm not interested in their penises? This is an interesting question, and one which would have been valid for you to ask had you done so in a spirit of genuine curiosity rather than demonstrating a determination to pre-judge and/or reject the answer.

The reasons I can basically summarise as follows: transsexual women look, act, and in the best cases sound, like genetic women without actually being so. Thus, they permit me to indulge my sexual attraction to women while simultaneously bringing a new range of sensual and interpersonal offerings that genetic women can't provide. These are:

1) created femininity. A transsexual woman in the later stages of transition is a work of art and a testament to a lifetime of aesthetic improvement. As the sexual partner of such a person, I feel almost as if this vast effort has been for my benefit and enjoyment. Making love to a transsexual woman carries some of the same thrill as driving a superbly-engineered car or owning a painting that took years to finish.

2) empathy. A transsexual woman has a better and more natural understanding of the male mind and sex drive than a genetic woman. Typically they have spent a significant portion of their formative childhood living in a male gender role before embarking on the course of actualising their true selves. The additional understanding this brings to them enhances sex, since I feel we are better able to appreciate one another's desires and needs. To give an example of this on a trivial level, in my experience no genetic woman has ever been able to give a blowjob to rival those provided by transsexual women.

3) Transgressive appeal - Being attracted to and having sexual relations with transsexual women is outside the normal range of sexual behaviour. Despite the increasing prominence given to it by the internet, it is still very much a niche, minority interest. It allows me to experience the excitement of going beyond the boundaries of what my family and community would find acceptable, while still allowing me to have sex with attractive women.

So there you go, as best I'm able to understand it. The above is what draws me personally to transsexuals. As for your reasons, or anyone else's, that's not for me to preach about or judge - a position you could do well to adopt.

I can easily relate to the reasons you've listed. One additional attraction for me is that a transsexual woman is feminine through choice rather than accident of birth.

[proud]

I wonder who needs the answer to the "tgirl cock" question? Or this is just another opportunity for someone to claim "i am 100% top" or "I don't care what is between her legs". Both of course quite unnecessary and incorrect statements. Internet indeed could be a play ground, but hey, lets try being real and honest with ourselves.

[MrsKellyPierce]

I always find the sex topics on HA hilarious.

Rather a man takes it or gives it in the bedroom, in my opinion doesn't make him any less or more manly.

His physical actions as a man out of the bedroom, makes him the man he is. His Personality, his thoughts on life, and his gestures. Is what attracts me to him.

What goes on in the bedroom is between him and I. We all like to climax, and we get there in different ways.

Would you call a man that bottoms for his wives strap on, a fag? A bottom bitch? Because she "tops" him? No probably not, since she is a genetic female.

People put way too much precedence on ones sexuality on how one gets off.

A gay man is gay, because he is attracted to a man. His looks, his personality, and his voice. That my dears is what makes him gay, how they get off is less about it. Some people call it "gay sex" so when a man sticks a dick in a womans ass, is that also "gay sex"????????????????????????????????

A female is a lesbian for the same reasons, she loves the female form, looks, personality. Thats what makes her a lesbian.

A bisexual is attracted to both.

And a man or woman attracted to a transsexual is either attracted to the female looks, brains, personality or they are more attracted to the fetish side of it just because they hold a cock and look somewhat of the oppisite sex of what they were born.

Which I think there are a lot of men on here that would sleep with anything with a big cock as long as they had a wig on.

Kisses

Kelly

[proud]

I always find the sex topics on HA hilarious.

Rather a man takes it or gives it in the bedroom, in my opinion doesn't make him any less or more manly.

His physical actions as a man out of the bedroom, makes him the man he is. His Personality, his thoughts on life, and his gestures. Is what attracts me to him.

What goes on in the bedroom is between him and I. We all like to climax, and we get there in different ways.

Would you call a man that bottoms for his wives strap on, a fag? A bottom bitch? Because she "tops" him? No probably not, since she is a genetic female.

People put way too much precedence on ones sexuality on how one gets off.

A gay man is gay, because he is attracted to a man. His looks, his personality, and his voice. That my dears is what makes him gay, how they get off is less about it. Some people call it "gay sex" so when a man sticks a dick in a womans ass, is that also "gay sex"????????????????????????????????

A female is a lesbian for the same reasons, she loves the female form, looks, personality. Thats what makes her a lesbian.

A bisexual is attracted to both.

And a man or woman attracted to a transsexual is either attracted to the female looks, brains, personality or they are more attracted to the fetish side of it just because they hold a cock and look somewhat of the oppisite sex of what they were born.

Which I think there are a lot of men on here that would sleep with anything with a big cock as long as they had a wig on.

Kisses

Kellyone of the most honest and deeply thought oppinions regarding the sexuality. more precisely the ts side of the sexuality. I will only add that you cannot also call a ts woman a man or masculine for topping a man. I said ts woman, not man with a wig. It will be nice if personality, gestures, brain, voice, etc. are the main focus.

[lazyman]

that's not for me to preach about or judge - a position you could do well to adopt.

So as I hope you can see, we do have our reasons. If our sexual tastes offend or confuse you, or if you can't see the logic in them, then I'm afraid that's too bad. You'll just have to do what most of the civilised world has been doing for over 40 years and accept people for what they are, not for what you think they should be.
I accept you for what you are--- an idiot who refuses to read, even when he pastes my comments directly into his response. You attempt to correct something you mistakenly call grammar, yet you don't even quote the statement that you pasted!! That tells me you either aren't reading, have ADD, are a moron, or simply want to spread your own silly-assed agenda regardless. Once again, your ridiculously long winded response has absolutely nothing to do with what I said, but I won't give it value by trying to explain where you went wrong. Obviously it's above your level of comprehension.

Yes I did quote it. Since we're probably just getting in the way of other forum members now, I suggest you PM me if you would like some help with your reading/comprehension.

[IsuckTgirlCock]

I LOVE THEIR COCKS. it must be big and thick and nice with cum filled balls, else they can take a walk. they bettr be totally hott and passble if they have small dick, then its ok. else ill just go bang a regualr chick

[Paladin]

I'm far more interested in what's between a girls ears than what's between her legs.

Good luck finding something there in the majority of shemales.

[dkdex]

well said,now lets see that cock!

[dafame]

There seem to be no end of threads on here with guys worshiping tgirl cocks.

Am I the only one that really doesn't care too much about tgirl cock?

Oh sure I'll suck and stroke a tgirl cock as foreplay and to help her reach climax, but I don't care about length or shape or girth because I'm 100% top and not interested changing that.

I'm far more interested in what's between a girls ears than what's between her legs.

I understand that the guys here cover a wide range and this is certainly not intended as criticism, but are there others who don't care about tgirl cock?

You know what's interesting to me is the whole social aspect of men that love shemales. I care very little about a girls size as well, however I'm not going to go as far as to say "I just don't see the cock at all. It's as if it isn't there. I just am attracted to the minds of these girls". Size isn't as issue but the fact of just knowing it's there is a huge turn on. Genetic women know and understand that when they meet a man it's all about physical attraction at first. That's why they wear certain outfits that accentuate their femininity. If they've go a big ass they'll highlight it. If they've got a nice rack they'll highlight that. Those are the things that make them significantly different than the opposite sex and thus the things that attract the opposite sex. If having a cock, or being someone that was born with a cock and through the means of surgery now doesn't (which is equally as nice) is what attracts the men that favor shemales, then why run away from that. Fellas you know damn well that if you were in a bar or club and a female (genetic) walked past you and your boys and she had the fattest juiciest ass or the most perfect titties and you turned to your boys and said "stop talking about her ass fellas, what about being at first attracted to her mind?", you would be laughed at and looked at as a "SIMP" for the rest of the night. The simple fact is that would never happen in a genetic situation so why here? Trust me, the girls know what attracts us, otherwise we wouldn't have seen all of their cocks to be able to be having this discussion in the first place. But in a way it seems like some of you guys pander to the things that you think they wan't you to say. Like it's going to earn you some "T" points or something.

[BeardedOne]

I care about the cock. No, really, I do. They're attractive, fun to play with, and taste good as well.

But is it always about the cock? I like to think that I don't focus =too= overly much on that part of a gurl.

I've been with gurls in social situations where the cock wasn't an issue. I've also been with gurls in intimate situations where the cock was the =only= issue, and then we went out to have a nice dinner.

Do 'straight' guys focus on big breasts? Long hair? Redheads? Blonds?


Oh sure I'll suck and stroke a tgirl cock as foreplay and to help her reach climax, but I don't care about length or shape or girth because I'm 100% top and not interested changing that.

Well, maybe 99.44%, but certainly not 100%. :wink: