Ralph Nader is back to destroy the dems !

[JelenaCD]

I love this guy , he is the best , he is a human dem destroyer ,

[chefmike]

Nader will have little or no impact on this year's election. He may even be less relevent than Ronnie Paul and his lemmings...

[Quinn]

I love this guy , he is the best , he is a human dem destroyer ,

The Democratic Party's leadership did a better job of that during the last two presidential elections than Nader ever could. Either way, Nader won't matter to this election's outcome.

-Quinn

[thx1138]

Never underestimate the power of Diebold voter fraud.

[thx1138]

obama gay sex and drugs? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY&eurl=http:%2F%2Fwww.anorak.co.uk%2Fpoliticians%2F1 79725.html

[El Nino]

If voting actually changed anything... they would make it illegal!

[Oli]

This MUST be the cubicle THX and El Nino post from!!!

http://oddorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/cube14.JPG

[q1a2z3]

Obama doing "gay sex" and drugs?
First of all there is no such thing as "gay sex." There is no reproduction involved so it must be sodomy. Drugs?
I can believe it. Sodomy and drugs are part of the Democrat Party's platform.

[trish]

Sodomy and drugs are part of the Democrat Party's platform.

Damn straight. Democrats are for keeping government out of the bedroom and for making drugs affordable for the citizens who need them.

[q1a2z3]

Hey, if it feels good - do it! LOL

[qeuqheeg222]

why doesnt this guy give up on the prezidency...he could easily win a house or senate seat from out west like oregon or norhtern california..from there he could really affect some legislation..or craft some interesting bills concernin the consumer or corps.......

[hippifried]

Because he's a megalomaniac.

Reality is that he's inconsequential.

[chefmike]

First of all there is no such thing as "gay sex." There is no reproduction involved so it must be sodomy.So are you implying that you are in fact a right wing sodomite? If so, kudos to you for your honesty, slick. You do consider yourself a log cabin repug, right? Or are you a closeted Tom Foley/Larry Craig type repug?

[thx1138]

Re: gay sex or sodomy: I wonder if Michelle Obama knows about these allegations. Obama may have used drugs but he didn't inhale. :>) Personally I don't care. bush had Jeff Gannon and is on mood stabilizers most of the time. Despite these bush is able to carry out his duties as the POTUS.

[thx1138]

@ oli: re tin foil cubicle..great idea but there's a problem: the ceiling must be tin foil plated too as most of the NSA subliminal message beaming comes down from overhead orbiting sattelites. I'll stick with my tin foil hat for the time being...thank you very much.

[chefmike]

Re: gay sex or sodomy: I wonder if Michelle Obama knows about these allegations. Obama may have used drugs but he didn't inhale. :>) Personally I don't care. bush had Jeff Gannon and is on mood stabilizers most of the time. Despite these bush is able to carry out his duties as the POTUS.

I have no idea what you are talking about because I never look at your links or el ninos...I was just responding to one of our resident repug sodomites.

[thx1138]

mike: No problem, I just type here because, basically, I have no life.

[trish]

First of all there is no such thing as "gay sex." There is no reproduction involved so it must be sodomy.So are you implying that you are in fact a right wing sodomite? If so, kudos to you for your honesty, slick. You do consider yourself a log cabin repug, right? Or are you a closeted Tom Foley/Larry Craig type repug?

q1a2z3 also seems to be agreeing that Bill Clinton did NOT have sex with Monica, and consequently never lied, and never should've been impeached. After all, there's no chance of reproducing through a blowjob, and certainly no chance of reproducing via cigar stimulation.

[thx1138]

@ trish: it all depends on the definition of the word "is".

[trish]

i know it sounds ridiculous, but a lot of important distinctions rest on the subtleties of language. it's what keeps lawyers in business. just last week the supreme court was exercised over the question "is it discrimination to fire someone who reports a case of discrimination against themselves?" the employer argued that the reason for the firing was not prejudice but rather for reporting prejudice. how one interprets language is greatly influenced by how one sees the world. what do you think, will the court go 5 to 4 on this one?

[Oli]

@ oli: re tin foil cubicle..great idea but there's a problem: the ceiling must be tin foil plated too as most of the NSA subliminal message beaming comes down from overhead orbiting sattelites. I'll stick with my tin foil hat for the time being...thank you very much.

LOL :D :D