It's all about the oil.

[thx1138]

http://jtaplin.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/its-all-about-oil-alan-greenspan/

[Cuchulain]

I would hope that most Americans ( at least those who don't get all their news from the O'Reilly/Hannity disinformation Network) realize that Bush/Cheney wanted the oil all along. The constant whining for Profit Sharing Agreements that would give the lion's share of Iraq's oil to foreign oil companies for the next 30 years should have convinced any skeptics.

Of course, it wasn't JUST oil. Iraq was the perfect opportunity for the Great NeoCon economic experiment:
"...most cherished belief of the war's ideological architects: that greed is good. Not good just for them and their friends but good for humanity, and certainly good for Iraqis. Greed creates profit, which creates growth, which creates jobs and products and services and everything else anyone could possibly need or want. The role of good government, then, is to create the optimal conditions for corporations to pursue their bottomless greed, so that they in turn can meet the needs of the society. The problem is that governments, even neoconservative governments, rarely get the chance to prove their sacred theory right: despite their enormous ideological advances, even George Bush's Republicans are, in their own minds, perennially sabotaged by meddling Democrats, intractable unions, and alarmist environmentalists.

Iraq was going to change all that. In one place on Earth, the theory would finally be put into practice in its most perfect and uncompromised form. A country of 25 million would not be rebuilt as it was before the war; it would be erased, disappeared. In its place would spring forth a gleaming showroom for laissez-faire economics, a utopia such as the world had never seen. Every policy that liberates multinational corporations to pursue their quest for profit would be put into place: a shrunken state, a flexible workforce, open borders, minimal taxes, no tariffs, no ownership restrictions. The people of Iraq would, of course, have to endure some short-term pain: assets, previously owned by the state, would have to be given up to create new opportunities for growth and investment. Jobs would have to be lost and, as foreign products flooded across the border, local businesses and family farms would, unfortunately, be unable to compete. But to the authors of this plan, these would be small prices to pay for the economic boom that would surely explode once the proper conditions were in place, a boom so powerful the country would practically rebuild itself.

The fact that the boom never came and Iraq continues to tremble under explosions of a very different sort should never be blamed on the absence of a plan. Rather, the blame rests with the plan itself, and the extraordinarily violent ideology upon which it is based. "
- http://www.harpers.org/archive/2004/09/0080197

Also, if the occupation of Iraq leaves America broke, the CONservatives will claim we can no longer afford any kind of social safety net (Social Security. Medicare, etc.). They will use this like a club to get rid of the remnants of FDR's New Deal, which they hate with a passion that far surpasses that of any 'Islamic Jihadist'.

Jesus, I hope we never see a Republican President or Congressional majority again in my lifetime.