poleskr
12-11-2007, 04:55 AM
I was browsing this website of an alternative physician and found this article. It's rather intriguing and was wondering if those of you on this forum who identify as homosexual agree with what the author says is the cause of homosexuality...i.e. the child not being able to bond with thier father during their critical early years of development (up until the age of 3 or 4)? Let me know your responses and if you agree or disagree with this theory. Here's the article:
What Causes Male Homosexuality?
In the psychoanalytic literature, male homosexuality has long been understood to be a reflection of gender-identity deficit. But because of society’s bombardment with a the propaganda of “Political Correctness” a concept developed and propagated by the Jews and the Jewish owned media (Newspapers, Television, magazines, and now – increasingly – radio) for sinister aims, the psychiatric profession has bowed to the Politics of the issue and has removed “Homosexuality” from the Psychiatric Disorder list and now discourages any treatment to change that behavior, even for those who WANT to change.
“Homosexualtiy is a developmental problem that is almost always the result of problems in family relations, particularly between father and son. As a result of failure with father, the boy does not fully internalize male gender identity, and develops homosexually. This is the most commonly seen clinical model. . .
“In the course of the child’s life, every significant developmental lesson has its critical period of receptivity. These periods of heightened awareness appear to have a biological basis. . . Receptivity to gender identity also has a critical period, after which the lesson will not be easily learned. Most researchers agree that the critical period for gender identification occurs before the third year (Greenacre 1957, Kohlberg 1966, LaTorre 1979, Moberly 1983, Money and Ehrhardt 1972, Socarides 1968, Stoller 1968). Within that period, the time of greatest receptivity appears to be the second half of the second year.”
“The child has some sense of the father from the very early months (Loewald 1951m Nagler et al, 1975), in fact, perhaps as early as 4 months of age (Abelin 1975). By 18 months he can differentiate pictures of boys and girls, men and women (LaTorre 1979). On a social level, he himself is increasingly being treated as a male. . . He gradually begins to view father as a self-like object. Now open and receptive to maleness, he will ‘exhibit a special interest in his father; he would like to grow like him and be like him. . .’ (Freud 1921, p 105)
“The boy does not yet understand that his emerging interest in father comes from a primal affinity based in their shared masculinity. Nor does he realize that father is the embodiment of what he himself is destined to be. Yet somehow there is a familiarity and a charismatic power.
“Now with the boy’s emerging sense of being like father, a dependency arises. He desires to be received and accepted by his father, and that fragile emerging masculine identity, receiving its only impetus from instinct, must be reflected in their relationship.
“Father needs to mirror and affirm the boy’s maleness. . . the boy seeks to take in what is exciting, fun, and energizing about his father. There is a freedom and power to outgrowing mother – and this power is personified by the father.
“If father is warm and receptive, the boy will be encouraged to dis-identify from the feminine and enter into the masculine sphere. He will then become masculine-identified and most probably heterosexual.” Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality, J. Nicolosi, Ph.D., p 25-28
“There is clear evidence that boys with absent fathers are capable of heterosexual adjustment if they have not experienced emotional rejection from a significant male figure. . .For the primary cause of homosexuality is not the absence of a father figure, but the boy’s defensive detachment against male rejection. . . Every male has a healthy need for intimacy with other males. This desire emerges in early childhood and is satisfied first with the father, then later with male peers. When this drive is frustrated, homosexual attraction emerges as a ‘reparative striving’ (Moberly 1983, p ix). Ibid p 34.
“Homosexuality is an alienation from males – in infancy from father, and in later life from male peers (because he is “different”). By eroticizing what he feels disenfranchised from, the homosexual man is still seeking this initiation into manhood through other males.” Ibid p 42
In one study of homosexual subjects who were NOT in psychotherapy, these subjects were more likely to perceive fathers as critical, cold, impatient, and detached. (Apperson and McAdoo – 1968, Journal of Abnormal Psychology 73:201-206)
In a study of forty homosexual males, Brown reports not a single case in which a homosexual had an affectionate relationship with his father. (1963 – Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society 115:304-311)
Rosen says, “For males, the presence of a good loving father during development is probably the best proof against homosexual development. . . I can think of no case (of homosexuality). . . where such a father has been present
In the early childhood years of development (1988- Hope for Homosexuals, et.
P. Fagan, pp 28-45. Washington, DC: Free Congress Research and Education Foundation p 21).
Socarides says, “Homosexuals consistently describe the father either as a weak, shadowy and distant figure or an angry, cold and brutalizing one” (1976 Male and Female: Christian Approaches to Sexuality, ed. R. Barnhouse and J. Holmes, p 145, New York: Seabury Press).
And Bieber states: “We have come to the conclusion that a constructive, supportive, warmly related father precludes the possibility of a homosexual son” (Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals. New York: Basic Books, 1962 p 311).
In the majority of cases, male homosexuality is caused by a lack of bonding with the father, the father’s emotional and psychological “absence” because, even though present in the home, he spends very little time with his young son and does not “connect.”
A significant number of fathers leave the early rearing of the children, both girls and boys, to the mother. Only when the young boy is old enough, usually age 4 or 5 or older, to participate in things that the father enjoys – baseball, football, swimming, sporting events, fishing, hunting, etc., does the father get involved. Unfortunately, homosexuality is usually “set” by the age of 3-5 precisely because of the child’s lack of bonding with his father.
Interestingly, homosexuality seems rarely to occur if the father is not present because he has died or is not present because of illness or some other appropriate reason. The child understands that he has not been rejected. So this feeling of rejection by the child appears to be a necessary component, along with the physical, or emotional and psychological absence of the father.
In a small number of cases, homosexuality may be the result of an excessively over-protective and controlling mother combined with a father who either may be too weak to object or who really wants to “connect” with his son, but in the interest of maintaining peace in the family, takes the easier road and allows the mother to take control. The outcome is the same. There is a lack of bonding with the father, and the son becomes a homosexual.
In other cases, the child has normally bonded with the father but is, at a later date, sexually molested by a man, possibly a relative or family friend. The child has been violated and humiliated and no longer feels worthy or comfortable to be in the heterosexual community or he may feel that no woman will be attracted to him.. He has also been exposed to the thrill-seeking, “exciting,” no-holds-barred debauchery of the homosexual community – and becomes addicted.
What Causes Male Homosexuality?
In the psychoanalytic literature, male homosexuality has long been understood to be a reflection of gender-identity deficit. But because of society’s bombardment with a the propaganda of “Political Correctness” a concept developed and propagated by the Jews and the Jewish owned media (Newspapers, Television, magazines, and now – increasingly – radio) for sinister aims, the psychiatric profession has bowed to the Politics of the issue and has removed “Homosexuality” from the Psychiatric Disorder list and now discourages any treatment to change that behavior, even for those who WANT to change.
“Homosexualtiy is a developmental problem that is almost always the result of problems in family relations, particularly between father and son. As a result of failure with father, the boy does not fully internalize male gender identity, and develops homosexually. This is the most commonly seen clinical model. . .
“In the course of the child’s life, every significant developmental lesson has its critical period of receptivity. These periods of heightened awareness appear to have a biological basis. . . Receptivity to gender identity also has a critical period, after which the lesson will not be easily learned. Most researchers agree that the critical period for gender identification occurs before the third year (Greenacre 1957, Kohlberg 1966, LaTorre 1979, Moberly 1983, Money and Ehrhardt 1972, Socarides 1968, Stoller 1968). Within that period, the time of greatest receptivity appears to be the second half of the second year.”
“The child has some sense of the father from the very early months (Loewald 1951m Nagler et al, 1975), in fact, perhaps as early as 4 months of age (Abelin 1975). By 18 months he can differentiate pictures of boys and girls, men and women (LaTorre 1979). On a social level, he himself is increasingly being treated as a male. . . He gradually begins to view father as a self-like object. Now open and receptive to maleness, he will ‘exhibit a special interest in his father; he would like to grow like him and be like him. . .’ (Freud 1921, p 105)
“The boy does not yet understand that his emerging interest in father comes from a primal affinity based in their shared masculinity. Nor does he realize that father is the embodiment of what he himself is destined to be. Yet somehow there is a familiarity and a charismatic power.
“Now with the boy’s emerging sense of being like father, a dependency arises. He desires to be received and accepted by his father, and that fragile emerging masculine identity, receiving its only impetus from instinct, must be reflected in their relationship.
“Father needs to mirror and affirm the boy’s maleness. . . the boy seeks to take in what is exciting, fun, and energizing about his father. There is a freedom and power to outgrowing mother – and this power is personified by the father.
“If father is warm and receptive, the boy will be encouraged to dis-identify from the feminine and enter into the masculine sphere. He will then become masculine-identified and most probably heterosexual.” Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality, J. Nicolosi, Ph.D., p 25-28
“There is clear evidence that boys with absent fathers are capable of heterosexual adjustment if they have not experienced emotional rejection from a significant male figure. . .For the primary cause of homosexuality is not the absence of a father figure, but the boy’s defensive detachment against male rejection. . . Every male has a healthy need for intimacy with other males. This desire emerges in early childhood and is satisfied first with the father, then later with male peers. When this drive is frustrated, homosexual attraction emerges as a ‘reparative striving’ (Moberly 1983, p ix). Ibid p 34.
“Homosexuality is an alienation from males – in infancy from father, and in later life from male peers (because he is “different”). By eroticizing what he feels disenfranchised from, the homosexual man is still seeking this initiation into manhood through other males.” Ibid p 42
In one study of homosexual subjects who were NOT in psychotherapy, these subjects were more likely to perceive fathers as critical, cold, impatient, and detached. (Apperson and McAdoo – 1968, Journal of Abnormal Psychology 73:201-206)
In a study of forty homosexual males, Brown reports not a single case in which a homosexual had an affectionate relationship with his father. (1963 – Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society 115:304-311)
Rosen says, “For males, the presence of a good loving father during development is probably the best proof against homosexual development. . . I can think of no case (of homosexuality). . . where such a father has been present
In the early childhood years of development (1988- Hope for Homosexuals, et.
P. Fagan, pp 28-45. Washington, DC: Free Congress Research and Education Foundation p 21).
Socarides says, “Homosexuals consistently describe the father either as a weak, shadowy and distant figure or an angry, cold and brutalizing one” (1976 Male and Female: Christian Approaches to Sexuality, ed. R. Barnhouse and J. Holmes, p 145, New York: Seabury Press).
And Bieber states: “We have come to the conclusion that a constructive, supportive, warmly related father precludes the possibility of a homosexual son” (Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals. New York: Basic Books, 1962 p 311).
In the majority of cases, male homosexuality is caused by a lack of bonding with the father, the father’s emotional and psychological “absence” because, even though present in the home, he spends very little time with his young son and does not “connect.”
A significant number of fathers leave the early rearing of the children, both girls and boys, to the mother. Only when the young boy is old enough, usually age 4 or 5 or older, to participate in things that the father enjoys – baseball, football, swimming, sporting events, fishing, hunting, etc., does the father get involved. Unfortunately, homosexuality is usually “set” by the age of 3-5 precisely because of the child’s lack of bonding with his father.
Interestingly, homosexuality seems rarely to occur if the father is not present because he has died or is not present because of illness or some other appropriate reason. The child understands that he has not been rejected. So this feeling of rejection by the child appears to be a necessary component, along with the physical, or emotional and psychological absence of the father.
In a small number of cases, homosexuality may be the result of an excessively over-protective and controlling mother combined with a father who either may be too weak to object or who really wants to “connect” with his son, but in the interest of maintaining peace in the family, takes the easier road and allows the mother to take control. The outcome is the same. There is a lack of bonding with the father, and the son becomes a homosexual.
In other cases, the child has normally bonded with the father but is, at a later date, sexually molested by a man, possibly a relative or family friend. The child has been violated and humiliated and no longer feels worthy or comfortable to be in the heterosexual community or he may feel that no woman will be attracted to him.. He has also been exposed to the thrill-seeking, “exciting,” no-holds-barred debauchery of the homosexual community – and becomes addicted.