pentagon vs. internet truth. who will win?

[thx1138]

http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.com/Articles/200711/20071119_IOR_3_Fight_Net.htm

[thx1138]

http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_sherwood_071119_radioactive_ammuniti.htm

[tsafficianado]

thx, you're about as useful as sand in your shorts. do you have any opinions about anything, or is it your mission to serve as the newspaper boy for HA? if i want to read some cockeyed bs i can always google libtard hysteria or the like.

[thx1138]

you're welcome.

[Oli]

thx, you're about as useful as sand in your shorts. do you have any opinions about anything, or is it your mission to serve as the newspaper boy for HA?

Couldn't agree more...THX, how about adding your thoughts about the many many articles you link to. You don't stimulate conversation by simply posting a link.

[thx1138]

Well, I'm kind of hoping "truth" will win. I always favor the underdog. Must be something genetic.

[thx1138]

How's that for an "intelligent" comment?

[hippifried]

I don't see where it's worth 136.

[thx1138]

@hippifried: what's 136?

[hippifried]

You claimed an IQ of 134 in the brain damage thread, but as I was writing that, my memory failed (must have been the multiple TBIs) & I arbitrarily gave you a couple of extra points.

You're welcome.

[thx1138]

yes, pls. if you're going to quote me at least quote me correctly. to answer your question: that's why I wrote "intelligent" and NOT intelligent.