PDA

View Full Version : AlGore: Sage,Guru,Oscar Winner



White_Male_Canada
02-25-2007, 08:14 PM
Al Gore has convinced many that he "took the initiative in creating the Internet", there was " no controlling legal authority that says this was in violation of law" ( it was) , stated he " found a little place in upstate New York called Love Canal" and of course, "within as little as 10 years (GW will) make it impossible for us to avoid irretrievable damage to the planet's habitability for human civilization."
His former exaggerations have all disappeared down the memory hole but Gore has been the loudest chicken little, jet setting around the world scolding us that if we do not do as he says the world will be beyond saving in less than a decade.

Gore lectures and browbeats the world on excessive consumption yet he and his wife live in two properties: a 10,000-square-foot, 20-room, eight-bathroom home in Nashville, and a 4,000-square-foot home in Arlington, Va. (He also has a third home in Carthage, Tenn.)

In Washington, utility companies offer wind energy as an alternative to traditional energy. In Nashville, similar programs. To date, there is no evidence that Gore has signed up to use green energy.

Do algore`s apocalyptic views include fossil fuels? Naturally, but then why doesn`t algore sell his shares in Occidental (Oxy) Petroleum? Algore has controlled hundreds of thousands of dollars in Oxy stock. Oxy has been mired in controversy over oil drilling in ecologically sensitive areas.

Then of course there was the Gore zinc mine. Back in 1972 zinc was discovered near the Gore property but not on it. Armand Hammer of Occidental Petroleum, then a close ally of algore sr. bought the land and then flipped it to the gore`s for the same price and then began leasing the land back to Oxy for 20 grand a month. The zinc from the mine was processed in Clarksville TN. which is a federal Superfund site contaminated with cadmium and mercury. Algore sold the mine only 4 years ago.

Algore`s book, An Inconvenient Truth is rife with either one sided, misleading,speculative,exaggerated or just plain wrong statements:

One-sided statements


• It neglects to mention that aggregate mortality and mortality rates due to extreme weather events declined dramatically during the 20 th century.

• It neglects to mention the circumstances that make it reasonable rather than blameworthy for America to be the biggest CO 2 emitter: the world's largest economy, abundant fossil energy resources, markets integrated across continental distances, the world's most mobile population.

• The book impugns the motives of so-called global warming skeptics but never acknowledges the special-interest motivations of those whose research grants, direct mail income, industrial policy privileges, regulatory power, prosecutorial plunder, or political careers depend on keeping the public in a state of fear about global warming.

• AIT never addresses the obvious criticism that the Kyoto Protocol is all economic pain for no environmental gain and that regulations stringent enough to measurably cool the planet would be a “cure” worse than the alleged disease.

Misleading statements

• AIT implies that, throughout the past 650,000 years, changes in CO 2 levels preceded and largely caused changes in global temperature, whereas the causality mostly runs the other way: CO 2 changes followed global temperature changes.

• It ignores the societal factors that typically overwhelm climatic factors in determining people's risk of damage or death from hurricanes, floods, drought, tornadoes, wildfires, and disease.

• It implies that a study, which found that none of 928 science articles (actually abstracts) denied a CO 2 -global warming link, shows that Gore's apocalyptic view of global warming is the “consensus” view among scientists.

• It reports that 48 Nobel Prize-winning scientists accused Bush of distorting science, without mentioning that the scientists acted as members of a 527 political group set up to promote the Kerry for President Campaign.



Exaggerated statements

• AIT hypes the importance and exaggerates the certainty of the alleged link between global warming and the frequency and severity of tropical storms.

• Claims polar bears “have been drowning in significant numbers,” based on a report that found four drowned polar bears in one month of one year, following an abrupt storm.

• Portrays the collapse in 2002 of the Larson-B ice shelf—a formation the “size of Rhode Island”—as harbinger of doom. For perspective, the Larson-B was 180 th the size of Texas and 1/246 th the size of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS).

• AIT presents a graph suggesting that China's new fuel economy standards are almost 30% more stringent than the current U.S. standards. In fact, the Chinese standards are only about 5% more stringent.

Speculative statements

• AIT blames global warming for the record-breaking 37-inch downpour in Mumbai, India, in July 2005, even there has been no trend in Mumbai rainfall for the month of July in 45 years.

• It blames global warming for recent floods in China's Sichuan and Shandong provinces, even though more damaging floods struck those areas in the 19 th and early 20 th centuries.

• It blames global warming for the disappearance of Lake Chad, a disaster more likely stemming from a combination of regional climate variability and societal factors such as population increase and overgrazing.

• AIT warns that a doubling of pre-industrial CO 2 levels to 560 ppm will so acidify seawater that all optimal areas for coral reef construction will disappear by 2050—implausible because coral calcification rates have increased as ocean temperatures and CO 2 levels have risen, and today's main reef builders evolved and thrived during the Mesozoic Period, when atmospheric CO 2 levels hovered above 1,000 ppm for 150 million years and exceeded 2,000 ppm for several million years.

• It warns of “significant and alarming structural changes” in the submarine base of the WAIS, but does not tell us what those changes are or why they are “significant and alarming.” The WAIS has been retreating since the early Holocene. At the rate of retreat observed in the 1990s, the WAIS should disappear in about 7,000 years.

• It warns that half the Greenland Ice Sheet could “slide” into the sea, even though the ice sheet sits in a bowl-like depression surrounded by mountains that restrict glacial outflow to the sea.

Wrong statements

• AIT claims glaciologist Lonnie Thompson's reconstruction of climate history proves the Medieval Warm Period was “tiny” compared to the warming observed in recent decades. It doesn't. Four of Thompson's six ice cores indicate the Medieval Warm Period was as warm as or warmer than any recent decade.

• It claims the rate of global warming is accelerating, when it has been remarkably constant for the past 30 years—roughly 0.17°C/decade.

• It attributes Europe's killer heat wave of 2003 to global warming; it was actually due to an atmospheric circulation anomaly.

• It claims that 2004 set an all-time record for the number of tornadoes in the United States. Tornado frequency has not increased; rather, the detection of smaller tornadoes has increased. If we consider the tornadoes that have been detectable for many decades (F-3 or greater), there is actually a downward trend since 1950.

• It blames global warming for a “mass extinction crisis” that is not, in fact, occurring. (CEI)

White_Male_Canada
02-25-2007, 08:16 PM
..

guyone
02-25-2007, 08:48 PM
If he wins for a PowerPoint presentation it will be the end of filmmaking as we know it.

White_Male_Canada
02-25-2007, 08:55 PM
If he wins for a PowerPoint presentation it will be the end of filmmaking as we know it.

:lol: heh-heh :lol: Good one.

But recall that M Moore won for his Leni Riefenstahl-esque fahrenheit 9/11 and the dixie chicks swept the Grammys. Nothing political going on there huh .

White_Male_Canada
02-25-2007, 11:05 PM
"Algore`s book, An Inconvenient Truth is rife with either one sided, misleading,speculative,exaggerated or just plain wrong statements:" WMC

So what your saying WMC, is that Al Gore is a fraud, a self-publicist, a piss poor scientist and hypocrite? MMMMMMM, SOUNDS FAMILIAR! Are you jealous of all the attention he's getting?

Ya got me !

I`ll admit algore isn`t a piss-poor scientist once you tell me what school he attended, his grades per year and in what scientific field he recieved his degree.

chefmike
02-26-2007, 12:07 AM
The busheviks are pissing their pants already... trotting out the typically tired repug talking points(lies)... :lol: :P

White_Male_Canada
02-26-2007, 09:09 PM
The busheviks are pissing their pants already... trotting out the typically tired repug talking points(lies)... :lol: :P

Point out one "lie" in this topic thread that exposes algore himgself as a nincompoop.

specialk
02-27-2007, 01:00 AM
What happened to WMC last night when he saw Al Gore get his oscar:

.>>>>>>>>>>

chefmike
02-27-2007, 02:27 AM
:roll:

White_Male_Canada
02-27-2007, 03:02 AM
WELL DONE AL!

Still waiting:

"I`ll admit algore isn`t a piss-poor scientist once you tell me what school he attended, his grades per year and in what scientific field he recieved his degree. "

Look at algore there. Like some sort of wax figure. Algore is a guy who just never looks comfortable in his own skin.

Heck, I`ve seen amnesiacs who have a better sense of themselves than algore does ! 8)

trish
02-27-2007, 03:32 AM
"I`ll admit algore isn`t a piss-poor scientist once you tell me what school he attended, his grades per year and in what scientific field he recieved his degree. "

let's see...i can't seem to remember...who's the anonymous one here: WMC or Al Gore?