Is it hypocritical when law says its legal to have sex but illegal if you pay escort? [Archive] - HungAngels

dimdim

07-23-2019, 04:02 AM

It sure seems that such a law is hypocritical because its 100% legal for consenting adults to have sex or share some kind of sexual activity(s) together, but if a guy gives her money for that sexual activity they just shared all of sudden it becomes illegal?????

I don't think that law has the right to exist because it clashes with another law that clearly states sharing sexual activities between consenting adults is legal. An act that is legal should not and cannot be deemed illegal if money is exchanged. Thats like saying its legal to eat a hamburger but it becomes illegal if you pay for one. Its hypocrital plain and simple.

It seems such a law that makes a sexual act between consenting adults who have made a choice by their own freewill to be illegal just because money was exchanged seems to be hypocritical and therefore a miscarriage of justice. Anyone agree?

dimdim

07-23-2019, 04:14 AM

An act that is legal should not and cannot be deemed illegal if money is exchanged. I believe this is my strongest point. Anyone agree with this statement?

dimdim

07-23-2019, 04:27 AM

Sorry if I repeated some of my pointers on this thread, but I really wanted to send my message across to others besides after so many minutes I was no longer able to make edits to perfect my posts but I think theyre quite good as is.

Murmdrum

07-23-2019, 04:39 AM

what happens between two consenting adults should be none of the "laws" business

gaysian71

07-23-2019, 07:45 AM

It's a law because it's gods law. Just ask any Jesus freak. Apparently there is an overwhelming amount of people who believe in Christianity. Oh, and then there's those Islamic motherfuckers. While their God is supposedly different. It's the same bullshit and that Christian bullshit. It's all bullshit. But it seems to control a lot of people, including lawmakers.

All I can say is

gaysian71

07-23-2019, 07:46 AM

Oh and in some states it legal to fuck your wife in the ass but illegal to fuck your girlfriend or another man or trans woman in the ass go figure.

dimdim

07-23-2019, 04:35 PM

Oh and in some states it legal to fuck your wife in the ass but illegal to fuck your girlfriend or another man or trans woman in the ass go figure.
Thats what it is, unrighfull control because they have the power. Notice in those countries how controlling men are of women with marriage laws that she cannot have any other partners, she must only have him where shes not even happy. Thats a way where men got together in those countries to write such a law to have control over you know what.

And then there are laws in other countries where she can take his house and he has to pay her monthly without getting any. And thats legal and ordered by courts. At least when a guy pays for a sexual service, its all fair game, she gets what she wants and needs and he gets what he wants and needs, its fair both ways but not in a marriage.(unless he licks her pussy and she finally gets some).

Besides the fact that paying for a sexual service should be legalised because sexual activity between adults is legal, (something legal should not be deemed illegal if money is exchanged-this needs to be written in the laws), it wouldn't be fair if a man didn't pay the more pretty, sensuous and wanted gender(female or shemale), he gets what he wants and needs and so does she. They need to earn a living you know. People/laws should not take that away from them when such activity between adults is legal.

holzz

07-23-2019, 08:32 PM

no,it's not hypocritical.

we make lots of distinctions between consensual sex.
Like adultery is illegal in some countries, and there is not necessarily any coercion involved.

Prostitution is illegal often because of religious or uptight conservative reasons.

filghy2

07-24-2019, 10:38 AM

Hypocrisy is not the right word. It would only be hypocritical if people advocating laws against paying for sex were seeing prostitutes themselves. Whether these laws are appropriate or fair is another matter.

BostonBad

07-25-2019, 03:03 PM

How about porn? The creation of porn is paying for sex. Without money there would be almost no porn.

dimdim

07-26-2019, 12:23 AM

And how about all female massage parlors where women pay for a massage? The woman giving a massage and the one who receives it (especially if its close to or on her butt as she lays on front or laying down the other way---big tits hard nipples) both get sexually aroused and they may go all the way, and its always kept as a secret. I never heard of police closing down an all female massage parlor or fitness club where this in fact happens between the fems.

Shouldn't adults have the right to receive money by providing a sexual service at their own discretion and risks? There are so many escorts that are 100% disease free like what over 99% of them have no STDs or what?

buttslinger

07-27-2019, 12:25 AM

what happens between two consenting adults should be none of the "laws" business

UNLESS..the law cosigned your marriage certificate.
I fucked hundreds of street hoes, the cops caught me in flagrante delictoa a few times but only busted me once, when I drove my van and two girls into a parking lot, and the cop had to squirm up onto my front bumper with a flashlight. I was arguing with the cop at the station "how can I be guilty of indecent public behavior when I was behind closed doors and officer Muldoon had to climb through some bushes and maneuver himself into the one tiny little spot where he could see me with a flashlight???
"Look, buddy, either sign the confession and pay the twenty bucks, or get booked, thrown in a holding cell and argue with the Magistrate tomorrow morning"
If I had been married and my wife found out, I would own the outside of the house, and she would own the inside.

Misterman1993

07-27-2019, 03:41 PM

Of course it's hypocritical, but the law is changing. In ten or so years it will be legal to pay for sex. Largely because of criminal justice reforms, sex workers asserting themselves in the political realm, and states needed new forms of tax revenue. Just contact your leaders and ask that they decriminalize sex work.

kfortune

07-27-2019, 04:12 PM

It's a law because it's gods law. Just ask any Jesus freak. Apparently there is an overwhelming amount of people who believe in Christianity. Oh, and then there's those Islamic motherfuckers. While their God is supposedly different. It's the same bullshit and that Christian bullshit. It's all bullshit. But it seems to control a lot of people, including lawmakers.

All I can say is

Actually I don't believe prostitution is mentioned in the New Testament in the sense of He was against it, except where Jesus stops the stoning of Mary Magdalene.

I don't even think it was against Jewish law (Mosaic law) except when the man or woman was committing adultery.
In many Christian (Catholic) countries prostitution is legal – for example, Spain (the home of the Inquisition) and most (if not all of Latin America – with the exception of Communist Cuba – which is officially atheist). And actually prostitution was illegal in every Communist country during the days of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact – while it was / is legal (controlled but legal) in most of Western Europe.

Prostitution is illegal under sharia law and in every Muslim country (and that’s not because of Christianity) because the Koran says so. However, polygamy, sex slavery and ‘4-hour marriages’ are perfectly okay under sharia law and Islam (we’ll forget what happens to transgender escorts in places like Qatar when the authorities decide to act).

The societal objection to prostitution is a commerce related one. In pre-leisure, pre-industrial era societies women had essentially three values. First as housewives (keeping a pre-industrial home was an 18-hour a day job); secondly to bear children (the original pre-industrial labor-saving devices – the more hands on the farm the better); and the third was any dowry (land, etc.) – basically they were assets in a merger as we see in dynastic marriages.

So if a woman took her value and used it in free trade (prostitution, for example), it weakened society. Remember, marriage started as a business contract.

But, even then, it existed throughout Europe and wasn’t illegal.

In the US it was legal (or tolerated) until the early 1900s. What changed? Progressive women and the suffragette movement. Yes, progressive reformers killed prostitution in the US. To them, prostitution enthralled women – and as regards human-trafficking, they had and have a point. To this day, progressives lead the charge against human trafficking and any prostitute is a ‘victim of human traffickers’.

And when anyone is forced into prostitution / human trafficked it is evil. However, if a person decides – by their own volition - to trade their labor (sex) for value (money), that’s that person’s choice.

In Costa Rica prostitution is legal. Pimping and pandering is not. Human trafficking still happens but it’s rare. Usually it’s in the rural areas where illegal immigrants (usually Nicaraguans) are enslaved by criminals.

But the US-feminist NGOs are always on the warpath against ‘sex trafficking and to them, that’s any prostitute or escort. The Catholic church and the evangelical churches could give a shit.

Misterman1993

07-27-2019, 04:17 PM

But that's not gonna last long. As we speak the movement to decriminalize sex work has gain traction in recent years with movements in DC and New York going strong. It may not happen today, but it will happen eventually. Don't forget we're becoming a service based economy and these states in the meantime are facing deficits and need new tax revenue. Why do you reckon marijuana legalization is gaining traction? Mark my words 10-20 years from now paying for sex will be legal.