Who's the Hottest: Khloe Kay, Chanel Santini or Daisy Taylor?

[nnfanatic]

I may be wrong, but it seems to me that the three hottest girls in t-porn currently are Khloe Kay, Chanel Santini and Daisy Taylor. I wonder how the people at Hung Angels see them. In which order do you rank them?

1144942114494311449441144945
1144946114494711449501144951
1144955114495611449611144962

I don't know how this poll will come out, except that there are no wrong answers.

[jerseygirlangie]

I'd add the lovely Aubrey Kate into the mix, as well - but I agree , there are definitely no wrong answers here !

[Castor_Troy05]

For me, Daisy edges it, but I feel for Khloe as if she was around at any other time, she’d be the top of the pile, it’s just fortunate for us that a hottie like Daisy appeared around the same time

[Fitzcarraldo]

Sheesh, the industry is cutthroat enough and the girls are already all jealous of each other. No need to aggravate it by trying to rank them. All three look lovely.

[Laphroaig]

Sheesh, the industry is cutthroat enough and the girls are already all jealous of each other. No need to aggravate it by trying to rank them. All three look lovely.

Agreed, apples vs oranges vs bananas, it's all personal preferences anyway...:shrug

[LilyRox]

Sheesh, the industry is cutthroat enough and the girls are already all jealous of each other. No need to aggravate it by trying to rank them. All three look lovely.

I wasn't going to say anything, but I agree its pretty rude to rank specific girls.

[Torris]

Khloe first cuz she hasn’t gone the boob job route. Love her little skeeter bites

[giovanni_hotel]

Sheesh, the industry is cutthroat enough and the girls are already all jealous of each other. No need to aggravate it by trying to rank them. All three look lovely.



+100. Why the hell does everything have to be a competition??
I hate these kinds of thread topics.

[filghy2]

I guess all those getting upset about this would like to abolish the TEAs as well. Take a deep breath people. Like it or not, the desire to rank things is just human nature. I don't think anyone's going to care too much about who gets more votes among a small group of people here. These girls operate in a commercial market place which is going to provide a measure of popularity anyway.

[LilyRox]

I guess all those getting upset about this would like to abolish the TEAs as well. Take a deep breath people. Like it or not, the desire to rank things is just human nature. I don't think anyone's going to care too much about who gets more votes among a small group of people here. These girls operate in a commercial market place which is going to provide a measure of popularity anyway.

To be fair there is no "hottest" TEA award. It's for performance which is a big difference. You can be above average in looks and have phenomenal performance then beat flawless 10's that have no personality. The problem with picking someone that is purely hot is that it's something other girls can't change. Sure you can get surgery to change your facial structure, but that only goes so far and needs luck too. I personally voted to equal out the vote and I'm sure others have as well. I mean lets be real there's a clear winner here from this group of girls.

[LovinThaTSLadiez]

Chanel Santini is an absolute beauty. However, in my humble opinion, Daisy is #1 on the list, followed by Chanel and then Khloe.

[filghy2]

To be fair there is no "hottest" TEA award. It's for performance which is a big difference.

Other posters were complaining about promoting competition and jealousy, so presumably the same concern would apply regardless of the criteria. If the girls care about these things I'm pretty sure they care more about the TEAs than a meaningless poll that they probably won't even be aware of.

[SanDiegoPervySage]

I see no problem ranking them. The way women are catty and petty towards each other, especially when it comes to insulting each others looks/ body, I see no issue with saying who is the hottest.

With that said, I'm feeling Daisy the most right now

[Fitzcarraldo]

I guess all those getting upset about this would like to abolish the TEAs as well. Take a deep breath people. Like it or not, the desire to rank things is just human nature. I don't think anyone's going to care too much about who gets more votes among a small group of people here. These girls operate in a commercial market place which is going to provide a measure of popularity anyway.

Who is upset?

[LilyRox]

Other posters were complaining about promoting competition and jealousy, so presumably the same concern would apply regardless of the criteria. If the girls care about these things then I'm pretty sure they care more about the TEAs than some meaningless poll that they are unlikely to be aware of.

The difference between a poll like this and the TEAs is the TEAs isn't predetermined. I could tell you easily the ending poll result before I seen any votes, if people are actually voting on purely looks and not performance. Its actually really easy to see when you don't have any biased attraction. The thing about polls like this are they don't encourage anything for girls, but negativity. If it something more generic like "who do you think is the best", that would actually give girls motive to become better. All this really does is basically encourage possible bad future surgeries. I know like I sound like I'm exaggerating, but this poll could have easily went one sided and if 3rd did see it I know it could hurt them pretty bad. Luckily I think some people purposely balanced it out (including me). Assume they will see it.

[filghy2]

Who is upset?

To be more precise four people (starting with you) were sufficiently concerned to complain about the poll.


The difference between a poll like this and the TEAs is the TEAs isn't predetermined. I could tell you easily the ending poll result before I seen any votes, if people are actually voting on purely looks and not performance. Its actually really easy to see when you don't have any biased attraction.

Sorry, why is the result predetermined? My impression is that all three are very popular, so I really have no prior as to how the vote would go.

I'm also curious as to how you define the difference between a biased and unbiased attraction? Aren't all these judgements inherently subjective? And how can you possibly know what people are basing their judgements on anyway? It may be about the sexiness of their performances as much as it is about looks.

[fred41]

The difference between a poll like this and the TEAs is the TEAs isn't predetermined. I could tell you easily the ending poll result before I seen any votes, if people are actually voting on purely looks and not performance. Its actually really easy to see when you don't have any biased attraction. The thing about polls like this are they don't encourage anything for girls, but negativity. If it something more generic like "who do you think is the best", that would actually give girls motive to become better. All this really does is basically encourage possible bad future surgeries. I know like I sound like I'm exaggerating, but this poll could have easily went one sided and if 3rd did see it I know it could hurt them pretty bad. Luckily I think some people purposely balanced it out (including me). Assume they will see it.
I always think the term "hot," when describing an individual in porn , is probably akin to the term "sexy". The term "hot" therefore would definitely include performance...since performance would add to the hotness of an individual. Hotness (Sexiness) isn't about the most beautiful or best looking then...in fact, I've seen individuals in porn, that in terms of aesthetics would probably be termed unattractive, but were incredibly hot.
But all 'opinions' on any kind of attractiveness are biased.
BTW...these three girls are some of the tops in terms of looks in the industry anyway (at the moment), so as time goes on the scales would continuously shift.
No one (including you) is the arbiter of good looks...so you couldn't 'easily' tell who would win even if it was purely based on that. It's just your opinion.

[fred41]

Actually filghy2 said it better with fewer sentences. Wish I saw that before I posted...lol.

[Fitzcarraldo]

To be more precise four people (starting with you) were sufficiently concerned to complain about the poll.

Uh-huh. Sheesh, I'm so upset! :heartbroken:

[youngblood61]

Tough choice. All are very HOT!

[Nick Danger]

1. Daisy Taylor
2. Everyone Else

There, that's not so cutthroat.

[LilyRox]

I always think the term "hot," when describing an individual in porn , is probably akin to the term "sexy". The term "hot" therefore would definitely include performance...since performance would add to the hotness of an individual. Hotness (Sexiness) isn't about the most beautiful or best looking then...in fact, I've seen individuals in porn, that in terms of aesthetics would probably be termed unattractive, but were incredibly hot.
But all 'opinions' on any kind of attractiveness are biased.
BTW...these three girls are some of the tops in terms of looks in the industry anyway (at the moment), so as time goes on the scales would continuously shift.
No one (including you) is the arbiter of good looks...so you couldn't 'easily' tell who would win even if it was purely based on that. It's just your opinion.

I mean when I wrote that no one was winning and its up to landslide from what I knew was going to be picked even after purposely balancing my vote in something else and I'm not even attracted to TS. Symmetry isn't really subjective when polled across a group of people. People can have tastes, but there's a reason why girls like Audrey Hepburn are iconic and it has nothing to do with the fashion or hairstyle.

[filghy2]

This sounds like a version of the old philosophical conundrum - 55 people thought they were exercising their free will in voting, but the outcome was predetermined. Now we know there is no point doing any more of these surveys - we can just ask Lily.

[Lester316]

They are all stunning in their own way; what's the point of the poll really.

[GroobySteven]

I guess all those getting upset about this would like to abolish the TEAs as well. Take a deep breath people. Like it or not, the desire to rank things is just human nature. I don't think anyone's going to care too much about who gets more votes among a small group of people here. These girls operate in a commercial market place which is going to provide a measure of popularity anyway.


I disagree - the TEA's are based on performance and what they bring to a scene - this appears based on looks. How do you judge one girl against another based just on looks? And why?

I find these threads a little stomach turning and unhelpful./

[Nick Danger]

I disagree - the TEA's are based on performance and what they bring to a scene - this appears based on looks. How do you judge one girl against another based just on looks? And why?

I find these threads a little stomach turning and unhelpful./

Well isn't it that unspoken thing, Steven? We have had beauty pageants in America since (Google pause) 1864, and there's always a talent portion. But somehow the most talented girl never wins.

The silver screen is absolutely lousy with beautiful women who can't act any role besides themselves in a different outfit.

Beautiful women never have a problem finding a job, they'll be hired by the first red-blooded male who interviews them, whether they are qualified for the position or not.

The why's have become irrelevant over the course of countless centuries of humanity. It's just a fact of life.

Women want us to see how physically attractive they are, they want to be judged based on how physically attractive they are, and for the most part, if they can live an easy life married to some rich guy because they're beautiful, they are not categorically opposed to the idea.

Unattractive women, of course, insist on being judged by different standards, but men aren't interested in their standards. At all.

As for Daisy Taylor, though, I'm not really judging her on looks. I mean, she's a cutie, for sure - maybe has a little bit of a pug nose. She represents no one's criteria for physical perfection, but very good-looking? Yes, she's that, and her body is in its prime, which doesn't hurt.

But I like her because she obviously loves to fuck. She's totally into it, at a higher level than most other t-girls. Could be because she's making vids with her hubby and it's all about the love, but I don't care why it is. She's my favorite. I'm a fan. I greatly enjoy her performances, so I voted for her and I don't feel a bit bad about it, nor do I see any problem with a poll judging porn stars on their hotness. Hotness is their business, yes? Be it physical or otherwise.

[Fitzcarraldo]

Our resident Id Monster has spoken.

[LilyRox]

Well isn't it that unspoken thing, Steven? We have had beauty pageants in America since (Google pause) 1864, and there's always a talent portion. But somehow the most talented girl never wins.

I mean with beauty pageants they really don't do anything and besides the fact its what the girls signed up for. I don't think most girls in any area of porn want to judged 100% on just their looks. If that was the case, wouldn't they just do modelling? Porn is a lot more than just a face or body.

Like I said performance with a combination of looks is a huge factor. There's only so much you can do with looks on your own, but why would you judge pornstars based on purely looks? Chanel Santini wins this easily in performance, but that doesn't matter here, it's going to be about something she can't change.

[Nick Danger]

Our resident Id Monster has spoken.

Hey, I'm just a guy who never had any reason to be politically correct, so I don't have to make any adjustments now that it's going out of style. The rest of you need to catch up with the times, we don't have to act like a bunch of pauncy hairdressers anymore.

[Nick Danger]

I mean with beauty pageants they really don't do anything and besides the fact its what the girls signed up for. I don't think most girls in any area of porn want to judged 100% on just their looks. If that was the case, wouldn't they just do modelling? Porn is a lot more than just a face or body.

Like I said performance with a combination of looks is a huge factor. There's only so much you can do with looks on your own, but why would you judge pornstars based on purely looks? Chanel Santini wins this easily in performance, but that doesn't matter here, it's going to be about something she can't change.

Fair enough, Lily. But here's something to think about - I don't find Chanel Santini particularly attractive. I know she's hugely popular, and I'm sure she is objectively attractive, but there's something about her face I find off-putting and I don't watch her videos - at least, not often; she obviously does a lot of videos and she turns up here and there whether I'm looking for her or not.

But my point is, I don't know much about her performances because I don't watch them because I don't find her attractive enough to go looking for her videos. So where does that leave us? I think it leaves us at - being attractive is basically a prerequisite for getting people to watch your porn videos in the first place.

And I'll add this: Back when I was watching nothing but straight porn (the 80's), my favorite porn star, BY FAR, was Tori Welles. I don't know if you even know who she is, but she was not the most beautiful porn star in the business, nor was she the most talented, nor did she do my favorite positions more than others or anything like that. It was nothing more than a look she got in her eye when she was being fucked and loving it. And isn't that the whole point of porn - that fantasy where you're the one fucking the girl and she's LOVING IT?

That's why I love Daisy Taylor - just that look she gets in her eyes now and then is enough.

[Stavros]

I could give readers of HA a list of the performers who don't excite me, and those that do -but would it say something about the people named, or something about me- and who is interested in that? So I have not voted in this poll.

[Fitzcarraldo]

hey, i'm just a guy who never had any reason to be politically correct, so i don't have to make any adjustments now that it's going out of style. The rest of you need to catch up with the times, we don't have to act like a bunch of pauncy hairdressers anymore.

q.e.d.

[filghy2]

I could give readers of HA a list of the performers who don't excite me, and those that do -but would it say something about the people named, or something about me- and who is interested in that? So I have not voted in this poll.

I'm afraid there is a logical contradiction in your post Stavros. The only people who haven't said something about themselves are the people who either voted anonymously or chose not to vote anonymously.

[Fitzcarraldo]

I'm afraid there is a logical contradiction in your post Stavros. The only people who haven't said something about themselves are the people who either voted anonymously or chose not to vote anonymously.

No need to get upset about logic. That doesn't change Stavros' point.

[filghy2]

No need to get upset about logic. That doesn't change Stavros' point.

Who's upset Fitzy? But if you insist let's parse the statement.

I could give readers of HA a list of the performers who don't excite me, and those that do -but would it say something about the people named, or something about me- and who is interested in that? So I have not voted in this poll.

1. A poll doesn't claim to do anything other than gather the opinions of those who respond. But what criteria apply to porn other than peoples' subjective judgements about what they find arousing? Like it or not, it's a commercial activity and the market is continually expressing judgements in $ terms. I hate to agree with Nick Danger on anything, but objecting to people expressing any preference on TS porn performers really is a lot of politically-correct hogwash.

2. Are you a seriously saying that those who expressed a preference were just saying something about themselves and thinking their opinion matters, whereas those who objected were not doing this?

So far 67 people have voted, 6 posted to express their preference and 5 objected to the poll. That says 2 things:
(a) the vast majority voted anonymously and cannot possibly have been saying something about themselves or assuming that others cared about their opinion
(b) the vast majority do not agree with your point of view.

How do you like that for logic Fitzy?

[Fitzcarraldo]

Who's upset Fitzy? But if you insist let's parse the statement.

I could give readers of HA a list of the performers who don't excite me, and those that do -but would it say something about the people named, or something about me- and who is interested in that? So I have not voted in this poll.

1. A poll doesn't claim to do anything other than gather the opinions of those who respond. But what criteria apply to porn other than peoples' subjective judgements about what they find arousing? Like it or not, it's a commercial activity and the market is continually expressing judgements in $ terms. I hate to agree with Nick Danger on anything, but objecting to people expressing any view on TS porn performers really is a lot of politically-correct hogwash.

2. Are you a seriously saying that those who expressed a preference were just saying something about themselves, whereas those who objected were not doing this?

So far 67 people have voted, 6 posted to express their preference and 5 objected to the poll. That says 2 things:
(a) the vast majority voted anonymously and cannot possibly have been saying something about themselves or assuming that others cared about their opinion
(b) the vast majority do not agree with your point of view.

How do you like that for logic Fitzy?

Wind him up and watch him go!

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/921/638/953.jpg

I notice you haven't replied to GroobySteven's comment.

[Cereal Escapist]

for my tastes, i would have picked a different set of girls to compare to Daisy because in my opinion, the other 2 are not even in the same ballpark as her.

Chanel used to be awesome but was replaced after being over-exposed, IMHO. there are too many other girls who are more to my liking for me to continue to seek out her porn because it all blends together.

Khloe is not my type at all and that odd fetish I had for her boyish chest juxtaposed with a pretty face, (really one of the first times i can honestly say I liked a femboy-type because she was a femboy-type NOT in spite of), faded as well.

daisy on the other hand checks nearly every box for me so she has gained and will likely keep my attention for quite some time.

[Cereal Escapist]

i posted my response before reading some of the backlash.

everything is a comparison.

a girl is considered hot (though admittedly subjective) because others are not. If comparisons were not made, there would be no delineation therefore I don't really mind that there is a rank. comparisons are unavoidable and breaking it down to a numerical rank is really no different than using anecdotal comments. without making discerning comparisons and deciding what you like more than others whether we are talking about porn stars, cars, fast food burgers of shaving cream, everything essentially is rendered equivalent, which we know they cannot be.

moreover, we are talking about porn stars here who were ALREADY selected out for us by the producers. There are plenty of women out there who may want to do porn but were turned down by producers because they may not have a marketable look therefore, how, as a fan, choosing a favorite is one being any less insulting than the person willing to pay them to take their clothes off for their profit and business.

I say rank away so long as your comments/reasons for your choices are not meant to demean a girl and you simply speak to your preferences.

i like tall, pale brunettes with large boobs and generally V or H shaped bodies irrespective of whether they are cis or trans. nerdy or lightly inked girls also get bonus points.

girls of that ilk will always be ranked higher on my list of favorite porn stars so i see no reason to apologize for that.

if you make a comment about Girl X being your favorite....inherent in that statement is that all other girls are not so the numerical rank is just more of the same.

[filghy2]

I notice you haven't replied to GroobySteven's comment.

Why must I respond to everyone's comments? I think point 1 above addresses it indirectly anyway. I notice you haven't responded to any point I've made either.

It looks like feigning insouciance with some kind of glib comment is your 'go to' response Fitzy. You've already responded to this thread 7 times so I don't think you can be too insouciant. You seem to a person who can't let things go but lacks the confidence to expose himself by making any response on substance.

Now let's see if you can resist the impulse to make another glib response just to save face.

[Lester316]

Insouciant.. really? Did someone buy you word of the day toilet paper? Dropping that one twice in a sentence screams a lack of confidence in plain simple language.

Also my response to this thread is that I have not voted as I find polls such as these irrelevant, redundant and reductive. Each performer has their own great merits; plus tastes in which performers people like are completely subjective so the thread is actually a waste of time.

[Nick Danger]

No need to get upset about logic. That doesn't change Stavros' point.

Which is what exactly? That virtue-signalers shouldn't take polls?

[filghy2]

Insouciant.. really? Did someone buy you word of the day toilet paper? Dropping that one twice in a sentence screams a lack of confidence in plain simple language.

What is this? Have you made a pledge like the three musketeers - "all for one and one for all"? Or is it the three amigos?

I guess your speciality is the irrelevant snarky comment. Would it change anything if I'd used another word like indifferent? Is feigned indifference better than feigned insouciance?

[filghy2]

Which is what exactly? That virtue-signalers shouldn't take polls?

Only if they tell everyone about it Nick. Otherwise it's like the proverbial tree falling in the forest.

[Lester316]

What is this? Have you made a pledge like the three musketeers - "all for one and one for all"? Or is it the three amigos?

I can do the glib put-down as well Lester. What else have you got?

That's three times out of two posts for glib also; do you actually know what it means?

To be clear the mockery of your odd linguistic choices highlighted by my previous comment was thoroughly sincere.

[Lester316]

What is this? Have you made a pledge like the three musketeers - "all for one and one for all"? Or is it the three amigos?

I guess your speciality is the irrelevant snarky comment. Would it change anything if I'd used another word like indifferent? Is feigned indifference better than feigned insouciance?

Also thank you :party: snark is a speciality of mine! But I like it to be somewhat relevant so I actually commented on the irrelevance of the poll at the same time because multi-taking is fun.

[filghy2]

Also my response to this thread is that I have not voted as I find polls such as these irrelevant, redundant and reductive. Each performer has their own great merits; plus tastes in which performers people like are completely subjective so the thread is actually a waste of time.


That's three times out of two posts for glib also; do you actually know what it means?

To be clear the mockery of your odd linguistic choices highlighted by my previous comment was thoroughly sincere.

Are you a linguist Lester? How long did you spend on the near-alliteration of "irrelevant, redundant and reductive"? That's another word you can add to your list.

Sorry, I forgot to mention your other speciality - the meaningless platitude masquerading (sorry, posing) as wisdom. Isn't just about every opinion poll a poll of peoples' subjective opinions? Don't people spending good money on these realise it's a waste?

To be clear my comments are thoroughly sincere. Happy musketeering.

[Ziggy33]

Miran

[Lester316]

Are you a linguist Lester? How long did you spend on the near-alliteration of "irrelevant, redundant and reductive"? That's another word you can add to your list.

Sorry, I forgot to mention your other speciality - the meaningless platitude masquerading (sorry, posing) as wisdom. Isn't just about every opinion poll a poll of peoples' subjective opinions? Don't people spending good money on these realise it's a waste?

To be clear my comments are thoroughly sincere. Happy musketeering.

You really are quite over defensive about the poll; it's almost sweet. And yes I'm well aware of alliteration (it wasn't planned out though, it just happened); as like many people I was told by an English teacher at school always mention it during an exam.

Perhaps you are still gleefully clinging onto the thesaurus you were given for your exams and that's where insouciant came from...

After all it probably is a bit too complicated for the word of the day toilet paper crowd so got to give you some credit there.

[Nick Danger]

I could give readers of HA a list of the performers who don't excite me, and those that do -but would it say something about the people named, or something about me- and who is interested in that? So I have not voted in this poll.

You're right and wrong, Stavros, but mostly wrong. What you're right about is that no one is interested in seeing a list of performers who excite you or don't. What you're wrong about is that your non-participation in this poll is some kind of statement. The actual statement you're making relates much more to the fact that you feel compelled to self-promote your non-participation, but hey, I get it - you just want to remind everyone that you're up there and we're down here.

We can't all be rated by exactly what we want to be rated by. As a middle-aged single male, I'd prefer to be rated on life experience and wisdom. Instead I'm rated on what kind of car I drive, what neighborhood I live in, and how much capital I can produce annually.

But I'm a private citizen. Public performers are fair game for rating in any way that's fun for the fans. If the performers get their feelings hurt, that's on them - they put it out there.

Many of the music artists I've known in my life refuse to read their own press. That's one strategy for avoiding even the remote possibility of getting emotionally stung by negative public opinion. And most of them were absolutely right - they would have gotten their feelings hurt if they read what people were writing about them. Comes with the territory.

I don't see why porn stars are any different from other public performers. And if they want to be rated on performance and not appearance, this poll seems to fill that bill - the poll question is "Who is the hottest?" Hotness encompasses performance IMO.

[Fitzcarraldo]

Why must I respond to everyone's comments? I think point 1 above addresses it indirectly anyway. I notice you haven't responded to any point I've made either.

It looks like feigning insouciance with some kind of glib comment is your 'go to' response Fitzy. You've already responded to this thread 7 times so I don't think you can be too insouciant. You seem to a person who can't let things go but lacks the confidence to expose himself by making any response on substance.

Now let's see if you can resist the impulse to make another glib response just to save face.

Does insouciance upset you?

My first comment said all I needed to say regarding the topic. And GroobySteven said essentially the same thing I did. You can analyze it all you want and look for fallacies and logical loopholes, but that doesn't change how anyone feels.

[Fitzcarraldo]

What is this? Have you made a pledge like the three musketeers - "all for one and one for all"? Or is it the three amigos?

I guess your speciality is the irrelevant snarky comment. Would it change anything if I'd used another word like indifferent? Is feigned indifference better than feigned insouciance?

Ah, so now it's a conspiracy. I had no idea. Who is the third?

[SanDiegoPervySage]

I mean with beauty pageants they really don't do anything and besides the fact its what the girls signed up for. I don't think most girls in any area of porn want to judged 100% on just their looks. If that was the case, wouldn't they just do modelling? Porn is a lot more than just a face or body.

Like I said performance with a combination of looks is a huge factor. There's only so much you can do with looks on your own, but why would you judge pornstars based on purely looks? Chanel Santini wins this easily in performance, but that doesn't matter here, it's going to be about something she can't change.

Modeling probably won't lead to being profitable like porn can if their goal is to make money selling ass. Do porn, raise your profile and they can charge more money for sex. I'm guessing you can't really do that with modeling. There's tons of shitty performers out there and tons of popular shitty performers. I'm sure a lot of the big name shit performers don't care about being the best. As long as they're getting that check, and lots of them.

[Josh_64]

There are some great girls out there right now. I would add Casey Kisses and Korra Del Rio. My favorite is def Daisy now. She is the most beautiful tgirl since Bianca Freire.

[Murmdrum]

1145608

[filghy2]

My first comment said all I needed to say regarding the topic. And GroobySteven said essentially the same thing I did. You can analyze it all you want and look for fallacies and logical loopholes, but that doesn't change how anyone feels.

If you said all you needed to say in your first post then what was the point of all the others? 83 people have now voted, so the arguments you and a few others made have been rejected overwhelmingly. Do you think you dissuaded anyone at all from voting? I wouldn't be surprised if some of them voted just because you were telling them they should not be doing it.

[LilyRox]

Modeling probably won't lead to being profitable like porn can if their goal is to make money selling ass. Do porn, raise your profile and they can charge more money for sex. I'm guessing you can't really do that with modeling. There's tons of shitty performers out there and tons of popular shitty performers. I'm sure a lot of the big name shit performers don't care about being the best. As long as they're getting that check, and lots of them.

Branding is basically grouped into modelling. Actual modelling doesn't really pay much, but it gives you a path way into other areas that can be extremely lucrative. I mean its not common by any means, but someone has to do it. Kylie Jenner is worth over 1 billion dollars from basically just getting surgery on her average looking face, taking selfies, and selling products tied to the Kardashian name.

You aren't going to find that in any area of porn as a performer and its not going to set up your future outside of the business. Even if you fail as model (which you have to assume 99% that you will) it can gateway you into the fashion industry as a whole or even into jobs outside of the industry, where as porn you aren't going to have anything to put on your resume if you decide to quit (Unless you have the skills to be a producer, but that's abnormal).

There's a big difference doing porn till 30 and having no experience to show at all vs going into an interview and having the ability to show you've been across the world modelling for the last decade even if you didn't do much.

Porn, escorting, and camming is very short term cash for girls vs modelling is an extremely risky area where you'll most likely fail; however, can set up your future in the fashion industry or even just a regular 9 to 5. If you have the face and body for modelling I don't see why you wouldn't do it over porn unless you're that fixated for fast cash.

[Laphroaig]

Agreed, apples vs oranges vs bananas, it's all personal preferences anyway...:shrug

At least I'm consistent...

http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/showthread.php?105047-Who-is-the-best-Kimber-Kimber-James-or-Kimber-Lee&p=1801128&highlight=Pointless#post1801128

[Fitzcarraldo]

If you said all you needed to say in your first post then what was the point of all the others? 83 people have now voted, so the arguments you and a few others made have been rejected overwhelmingly. Do you think you dissuaded anyone at all from voting? I wouldn't be surprised if some of them voted just because you were telling them they should not be doing it.

Most of my posts have been responses to posts by you directed at me. I suppose you're right, though--that is pretty pointless.

I never made an argument. I stated an opinion. You proceed under erroneous assumptions. You assumed I was upset. You assumed I was trying to persuade people. You assume I'm conspiring with others. And you assume I care about what you have to say.

I don't care who voted or how they voted. I didn't vote. I think it's a dumb idea. You're not going to convince me otherwise with logic or a thesaurus.

[filghy2]

At least I'm consistent...

http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/showthread.php?105047-Who-is-the-best-Kimber-Kimber-James-or-Kimber-Lee&p=1801128&highlight=Pointless#post1801128

You know people do choose between apples. oranges and bananas all the time? Isn't it a circular argument to say it's not right to poll people's preferences because it's all a matter of personal preference?

[filghy2]

And you assume I care about what you have to say.

If you don't care about what I have to say, why is it that you have to keep responding?

[Laphroaig]

You know people do choose between apples. oranges and bananas all the time? Isn't it a circular argument to say it's not right to poll people's preferences because it's all a matter of personal preference?

One word on polls....................Brexit.:hide-1::hide-1:

[Cereal Escapist]

One word on polls....................Brexit.:hide-1::hide-1:

That spoken more to the British education system and the engagement of its populace than anything else.

This poll is wholly different as we are talking about girls with poles and polling about poling girls with poles is a poll worth polling.

[Fitzcarraldo]

If you don't care about what I have to say, why is it that you have to keep responding?

Well, if you address me directly and ask me a question, would you prefer that I ignore you?

Also, it's been pretty funny so far.

At the time when North America was hardly explored...one of those early French trappers went westward from Montreal...and he was the first white man to set eyes on Niagara Falls. When he returned, he told of waterfalls that were more vast and immense...than people had ever dreamed of. But no one believed him. They thought he was a madman or a liar. They asked him, 'What's your proof?' And he answered, 'My proof is...that I have seen them."

[Laphroaig]

That spoken more to the British education system and the engagement of its populace than anything else.

This poll is wholly different as we are talking about girls with poles and polling about poling girls with poles is a poll worth polling.

My point was polls generate discussion and arguments, sometimes very heated, regardless of the topic. The debate over this one is a storm in a teacup by comparison. Still a completely worthless poll IMO...:shrug

[lee442]

Chanel was amazing when she started out, but I find all the lip fillers and other face work she has had done to be really unattractive.

She was a natural hottie, but I think Khloe Kay still edges Chanel in terms of looks from any point in her career.

Still need to check out Daisey. I'm looking forward to it :)

[smalltownguy]

My point was polls generate discussion and arguments, sometimes very heated, regardless of the topic. The debate over this one is a storm in a teacup by comparison. Still a completely worthless poll IMO...:shrug

perfect storm indeed

[SFlare]

All hot, but I'd go with Daisy if I had to choose one.

So funny how fragile and overly sensitive some people can be.

[Stavros]

There are GOAts, and there are lambs. Both end up slaughtered, roasted, and on a plate. In this case, one hopes the ladies concerned will stay out of the kitchen, and just carry on doing what they want to do, occasionally letting us grateful sidewiners have a peek or two...