Results 1,431 to 1,440 of 2347
-
05-22-2012 #1431
Re: 17yr old black kid shot and killed for walking in white suburbia?
by Falrune
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 1:08 am
Race is an old concept that should probably be discarded. It was
created by people who had a very limited knowledge of their world. If you
look at any genetic map (mitochondrial or Y chromosome DNA), you can
see there is no biological basis for the idea of a white or black or asian
race.
Here's a nice map
http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/journey/
-
05-22-2012 #1432
-
05-22-2012 #1433
Re: 17yr old black kid shot and killed for walking in white suburbia?
Why racism doesn’t die
This country is famous for one of the most organized and inspiring nonviolent movements in modern history. It unfolded sixty years ago in the aftermath of the Holocaust in Europe and focused on the racism that was an unresolved legacy of the Civil War. It was brilliant, but sadly, not enough.
Last week in Mississippi, Deryl Dedmon, Jr. and John Aaron Rice, along with a group of ‘psyched up’ white teens, left a party with the intention of finding an African American to ‘mess with.’ Driving sixteen miles to the other side of town they set upon the first man they saw—James Craig Anderson—and beat him viciously. Eighteen-year-old Dedmon, now charged with murder, stayed behind long enough to run Anderson over with his truck and leave him for dead. To top it off, his lawyer went beyond human decency to protect his client, insisting that it was not a racially motivated crime.
Maybe, on some level, it’s a positive sign that we do not want to admit that there is still racism in this country, despite the experience of people living in James Craig Anderson’s community, immigrant families in Arizona, farmworkers in California, or sleeping children in Afghanistan. But denial isn’t going to make the problem go away. What will make it finally go away is a recognition that racially motivated crimes have a cause and that we can get to it by shifting our awareness from hate crimes to just simply hate.
Unfortunately, our country takes the opposite route: from hate crime to crime, leaving us with a cycle of retribution and injustice that will never solve the problem. Racism is a form of violence and it isn’t going away until we repudiate violence itself. We demand that our political leaders be “tough on crime,” but forget to ask ourselves, where are the candidates who are “tough on hatred, tough on violence”?
One needn’t look far, then, to see one critical reason why racism doesn’t die—a reason that we ignore only because so many of us are numbed into insensitivity by its sheer familiarity. We ourselves saw a shocking example the other day on the main street of liberal Berkeley: a graphic poster for a popular television program with the bold message, “LET’S GO KILL SOMETHING.”
Coming as it did right after the very real murder in Mississippi, the echo was sickening. It isn’t just the message that violence is fun, but the enabling denial that makes violence possible, which is dehumanization: you cannot kill something, of course, but someone, some form of life.
There is something we can do, however, if politicians will not: we can start turning our backs on violence as a form of “entertainment.” In one recent study carried out at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig it was shown that children were three times more likely to behave with empathy if they were shown a picture of two dolls in a friendly pose than if the doll images were negative or neutral. There are so many studies now showing our sensitivity to this “priming,” as scientists call it, that the effect is something we can no longer deny but on the contrary can take responsibility for and use it as a lever for pushing back against, and eventually perhaps banishing the violence that’s become endemic in the industrial world.
“Mind precedes action” as the Buddha said, and getting extremely dehumanizing images—the constant fare of our films, books, and video games—out of our minds is the point of leverage from which to start getting real or physical violence out of our lives. Right now we are relying on violence for “security” in everything from individual bullying to criminal “justice” and finally war. It will be a long struggle to rebuild every one of those behaviors and institutions, but that struggle can’t even begin until we detoxify our mental environment and let our native capacity for empathy —which science has recently shown to be well ‘wired’ in our very nervous systems—regain the upper hand.
One advantage of starting this by boycott of violent media is that it doesn’t need to be organized; we can just do it, and we should not overlook the power of even one mind that is concentrated and backed by positive energy. From there, of course, by educating and organizing we can start growing the change into a real movement. Many individuals and many families have borne witness to the healthier, sometimes deeply happier lives they enjoyed soon after they stopped watching television. Once the initial feeling of deprivation subsided, their taste for reality (which violence is not) came back into their lives. Pointing this out and experiencing it will add drive to this key campaign that is surely a sine qua non for racial justice. For this reform cannot take place in a vacuum because as Martin Luther King said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Nor can it take place on the political or even the social level alone because it’s by now too deeply rooted in how some people think and see the world.
Not all media need be renounced, however. One recent attempt to portray at least part of the other side is the film Help, which illustrates what the famous Norwegian peace researcher Johan Galtung has called the “Great Chain of Nonviolence,” where oppressed, voiceless people—in this case black domestic workers in the south—link up by a chain of relationships to people in power, in this case through friendships that naturally form with the white women they work for. Help is an indifferent success, however; some reviewers have felt it was sappy at best and racist at worst due to the depiction of black men as abusive, alcoholic and illiterate. It may only help to confirm the belief that violence is real (the graphic effect of the “Let’s go kill something” vampire genre), whereas love and nonviolence are only weak and uninteresting imitations.
Much better is a 1989 film, The Long Walk Home, with Whoopi Goldberg, Cissy Spacek, and Dwight Macdonald. It not only stares racism in the face, but it is also one of the few films in history to show an actual representation of nonviolence working against a fierce opponent—something even Attenborough’s Gandhi, for all its sophistication, did not quite do. In the climactic final scene a group of terrified black women penned in by a chanting racist mob conquer their fear by singing a pertinent spiritual and walk unhindered through the confused men trying to stop them. This is realism: many scenes like it actually took place in the Civil Rights movement and elsewhere..
With the likes of Gandhi, The Long Walk Home, or the 1995 political drama Beyond Rangoon we could “reprime” our lives. When we run out of such films—and Lord knows they are rare—we can spend time with friends and family that we would otherwise have spent watching someone else’s idea of entertainment. As Gandhi once said, evil does not exist: it can only make its appearance as long as we cling to it. Why not put that to the test by not clinging to images of violence?
http://wagingnonviolence.org/2011/08...sm-doesnt-die/
Attached Images:
-
05-22-2012 #1434
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 254
Re: 17yr old black kid shot and killed for walking in white suburbia?
What about the white man in Samford, FL who was attacked by two black racists with a hammer and beaten to within an inch of his life (he may have died from his injuries, I do not know). Should the stand your ground law be available for him or should he have to suffer through a hammer attack?
What about the two asian grad students at USC who were executed by racist black males while sitting in a parked car? Sureley a stand your ground law may have helped them (or may help others in the future). Why should people be forced to be victims to the atrocities committed on them by racist black people? Why? I don't want to die because I'm being attacked by somebody with a hammer. I want to be able to shoot them and I want the law to be on my side.
-
05-22-2012 #1435
Re: 17yr old black kid shot and killed for walking in white suburbia?
Fine, but the law is still flawed.
THe fact that someone like Zimmerman was initially protected by SYG because only he alone is able to interpret his intent should tell you that.
Was it ever against the law to defend one's self with the use of deadly force when being attacked before SYG?? I don't think so.
It's ironic you are trumpeting the equitable use of hate crime laws when the victim isn't Black since most conservatives believe hate crime laws are redundant and unnecessary.
We still don't know the motive behind the murder of the USC grad students. If it was gang related, it may have had more to with a gangbanger earning his spot in a crew and his choosing what appeared to be easy targets. I also thought they were robbed. It could have been a failed car jacking.
To say because the victims were Chinese and the attackers allegedly Black doesn't make it by definition a hate crime.
And since when did a debate about SYG become a discussion about protecting yourself against racist Blacks?? Huh??
SYG in theory should not have a racial component to it at all. I don't know why you're defending it using those parameters.
-
05-22-2012 #1436
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 254
Re: 17yr old black kid shot and killed for walking in white suburbia?
It depends on the case. There are many cases of people being charged with homicide while defending themselves. I think that was the point of SYG.. to leverage an existing SCOTUS ruling as framework for state laws that would protect those who defended themselves.
They are unnecessary IMO. However, if you're going to have a hate crime law then it should apply equally to all people, not just against white people. That's unconstitutional. The purpose of hate crime legistlation isn't to punish hate crimes, it's to find an excuse to add more charges to white people who commit crimes against minorities. But to your point yes - I think hate crime legislation is largely unnecessary and unconstitutional in how it is enforced.
Trust me I get it... The only people who will ever be charged with 'hate crimes' are white people who commit crimes against minorites. Look, I happen to be saying something that nobody either has the balls or intelligence to say: Black people are human beings and they are JUST as likeley to be as racist and hateful as any other person of any other race. Anybody who can't grasp that concept has zero understanding of human nature. It's an insult to my intelligece to ignore racism and the possibilty of hate crimes when blacks commit crimes BUT IT IS LARGELY IGNORED BY THE MEDIA AND CERTAINLY BY MEMBERS OF THE BLACK COMMUNITY AT LARGE. How come I only hear people squealing about hate crimes and racism is when a white person is involved? Hell, Zimmerman wasn't even charged with a crime and I don't think he should be simply because black people feel that Martin was 'profiled'.
I'm calling out the hypocrisy of blacks and minorities that insisting that Zimmerman be charged with a hate crime when I see racist blacks commiting hate crimes all the time and nobody says anything. Just calling out bullshit when I see it.
-
05-23-2012 #1437
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Queens, NYC
- Posts
- 409
Re: 17yr old black kid shot and killed for walking in white suburbia?
giovanni, just out of curiosity, since this board has members from all over the world, where are you from? I live in New York City. I ask because different parts of the world view the use of force differently.
Now, to give my view to your questions. The SYG law may or may not be flawed on it's own. Remember, the detective from Sanford P.D. felt that SYG did not protect GZ. The Prosecutor said it did.
Was it ever against the law to defend oneself with the use of deadly force?
Yes. And in some States, it still is. In many States in the US. Which is why Castle Rule laws were passed. They are SYG only for your home. Some states, like NY are known as 'duty to flee' States because everybody, even a homeowner, has the duty to do everything they can, including running our of their own home, to avoid using deadly force. Castle Rule and SYG laws were passed because the public disagreed with the arrest and conviction of so many people they felt were wrongly convicted, that the new laws were passed.
-
05-23-2012 #1438
BREAKING NEWS:4 zimmerman witnesses change story
BREAKING news:4 zimmerman witnesses change story
Newspaper: 4 witnesses change stories in Trayvon Martin shooting
At least four key witnesses have changed their stories about what they saw the night George Zimmerman fatally shot Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Fla., the Orlando Sentinel reported Tuesday.
the report comes after state prosecutors released about half the evidence they have in their second-degree murder case against Zimmerman.
The witnesses, known publicly only by numbers, first talked to Sanford police and later to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and state prosecutors.
Witness 2: A young woman from the Retreat at Twin Lakes community, where Martin, 17, was shot Feb. 26, first told investigators she saw two men running and a fist fight. She later said she only saw one person running and couldn’t distinguish much because she had removed her contact lenses.
Witness 12: A young mother in the townhome community first said she saw two men on the ground but wasn’t sure who was on top; she later said Zimmerman was on top because she recognized his size based on news reports.
Witness 13: A male neighbor first said Zimmerman, with a bloodied head, told him he had to shoot Martin because “he was beating up on me,” and to please call Zimmerman’s wife. He later went into detail and described Zimmerman’s tone right after the shooting as casual, like the shooting was “nothing.”
Witness 6: A male neighbor, whose story change was initially reported Friday, first told police Martin was on top of Zimmerman and throwing down punches mixed martial arts style. He also first said Zimmerman was calling for help. The man later said he wasn’t sure who was yelling for help, and that Martin may have merely pinned Zimmerman to the ground. He was still sure, however, that Martin was on top.
Earlier: Court docs: Trayvon Martin shooting 'ultimately avoidable by Zimmerman'
http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/20...-shooting?lite
-
05-23-2012 #1439
Re: 17yr old black kid shot and killed for walking in white suburbia?
I live just outside D.C. in Northern Va. Where all the gun lovers buy their toys with the most lax background checks in the country. I don't care what anybody says, it's unnerving to see a hayseed walk into the grocery store with I kid you not, a silverplated .357 revolver in a holster attached on the hip of his jeans.
It's the ability for someone to decide on their own they felt their life was being threatened without any investigative review by law enforcement that IMO makes the law flawed.
-
05-23-2012 #1440
Similar Threads
-
2 young police officers shot by 2 black men at traffic stop.
By Solitary Brother in forum General DiscussionReplies: 53Last Post: 04-18-2012, 03:40 AM -
Rapper Dolla shot and killed at Beverly Center in LA
By phobun in forum General DiscussionReplies: 27Last Post: 05-20-2009, 12:41 PM -
Fear of the Black Man (Are They Trying to Have Him Killed?)
By dafame in forum Politics and ReligionReplies: 32Last Post: 10-12-2008, 06:29 PM -
I need help with walking...
By Aragon21 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 14Last Post: 04-14-2007, 02:13 AM -
DJ Asia Has Been Shot and Killed
By DJ_Asia in forum General DiscussionReplies: 24Last Post: 04-06-2007, 09:49 AM