Results 11 to 20 of 193
-
07-14-2013 #11
Re: The George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin Travesty
me too as well...not the least bit
...the operative key words here are Travesty and Florida...the 2 seem to go hand in hand....from the recount fiasco in 2000 to the current governor w/ his voter suppression and anti abortion BS and everything in between....I called it from the git go
2 out of 3 members liked this post.the Meek shall inherit the Earth....the Rest of Us will go to the Stars
-
07-14-2013 #12
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Mid Tennessee
- Posts
- 324
Re: The George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin Travesty
The prosecution blew this one plain and simple.Complete ineptitude.
1 out of 2 members liked this post.
-
07-14-2013 #13
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Posts
- 7
Re: The George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin Travesty
If people in the media would let things be and race hustlers like Jesse and Al would have left it alone, this case would have never went to trial. It doesn't help when Obama sticks his nose in things and the justice dept. sends people in to help gin up racial unrest.
6 out of 11 members liked this post.
-
07-14-2013 #14
Re: The George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin Travesty
WOO HOO! About to put the law degree to some use. No offense to Dderek, who has an excellent post on this, which I've copied part of below. I've edited it for relevance to the actual charge of murder, and the lesser included charge of manslaughter.
Before I do that though, a quick lesson in Criminal Law 101. Should be fairly straight forward, but for some of the foreigners who might be looking at this, I'm kind of trying to get them up to speed.
1) First, charges. Murder has various degrees in US Courts. Murder 1, Murder 2, etc. These vary by state but most Murder charges usually have a mental state of intent to kill. That's pretty much all you really need to know about Murder. Manslaughter is tricky and varies by State, here in the USA. There are two types, voluntary and involuntary. Look, a link!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manslau...ted_States_law)
With voluntary, the types of manslaughter, 1) Provocation, is you are the person provoking the altercation, and "accidentally" kill someone. As will be seen below, this doesn't apply as technically Zimmerman didn't provoke this. Imperfect Self Defense. Doens't apply as Florida has Self Defense as a complete defense. And finally, Diminished Capacity. This is usually reserved for people with mental illness or defects.
With involuntary manslaughter, there are only two rellevant types that would apply here. First, Constructive, you need to have a misdemeanor involved. As I'm going to explain below, Zimmerman was not committing any misdemeanors at the time. It seems very hard to believe, but it's actually true. The second type Criminally negligent, you really have to have acted in a way that shows you have no respect for human life, you are acting recklessly and endangering others. This is the only manslaughter type that technically applies. But under Florida law, Criminally neglegent manslaughter doesn't exist. Only Constructive.
2) Defenses - Within each criminal act, there are defenses. Self Defense is obviously the one most people go to. Insanity, duress, and others are included. But each one of these defenses is limited and may only be applied in certain circumstances. There are limits to the amount of force you can use. For example, you may only use the amount of force it takes to get a normal person to stop beating you. If you are weaker, you can pick up a log and clock someone to get the to stop. The problem is, if they've stopped, you can't wail on them with a log until they're dead, that's excessive. Only the force required to provide defense. Remember this, because why Zimmerman is free will make sense later on in this posting. There is also the concept of mitigating circumstances. With regard to manslaughter, yeah the shooting of a gun may not have been meant to kill someone, but can you aim a warning shot while getting beat down? Can you keep from flinching in a way that keeps you from a reflex pulling of the trigger?
The same perfect defense of Self Defense for Murder, works with Manslaughter too, in Florida.
3) The Irrelevant Stuff - Every other lawyer I know, knew Zimmerman was going to get off with an acquittal. It was a no-brainer to most of us. Prosecutors don't count, they think everyone is guilty and should get the chair. Real attorneys, we knew better. Stand Your Ground, that got a lot of hype in the news. It was never mentioned at trial. It was irrelevant and didn't apply. So forget about it, don't let it boil your blood, and don't let the media get you worked up over this. It's irrelevant and has nothing to do with the verdict. In fact, just read the earlier post below, and notice which of the facts were actually relevant. You'll see the ones I removed noted.
Nothing else mattered. Look, it sounds horrible to say this, but you have to look at it without lives being involved. Like numbers or two bricks with conflicting stories.
The part where Zimmerman follows Martin. Doesn't matter. I can in any of the 50 US States and the United Kingdom (I'm working on my Solicitor's License there, we just covered this) I can get out of my car and follow you 2 inches away from you at any time, and as long as I have a right to be in that place, I can follow you anywhere. No joke. So Zimmerman getting out of the car and following? Irrelevant. If someone is following you, you call the cops. Or you go somewhere they can't follow you, like inside your father's fiance's house, or knock on a neighbors door and ask them to call the cops or let you in. That's all you have to do.
I can follow you and ask you all kinds of questions. You don't have to answer them unless I can identify myself as law enforcement, and provide proof of that. Even then, you don't have to answer any questions without legal representation present, as long as you make that wish known to the law enforcement official. Martin didn't want to answer any questions, great, walk inside the house, give him the finger and say "when you get a badge, you know where I'll be." Done, easy, and no one dies.
I'm going to ignore my usual disdain for NYSPRod, because he actually does bring up something important below
Here's the part that is going to mess with your head. Under the law, if you pick a fight with Mike Tyson, first, you're a really stupid person. But also, you are going to get your ass handed to you. Even if you pick the fight, deliver the first blow, if you are getting creamed by Tyson, you are allowed the right under the law to retreat. Yeah, you'll be suffering in a hospital, and have permanent injuries, but you'll live to tell the tale. Assault? Probably not, because in most jurisdictions, when Tyson joins in, you both have consented to fight. If Tyson won't let you retreat, run away to mommy and lick your wounds like the pussy you are, then he's on the hook for assault. Because you are no longer of consent.
So, Martin and Zimmerman. It doesn't matter who threw the first punch. At this point, they are fighting. Martin could have ran, could have stayed and took a beating, and Zimmerman would have a second assault charge and probably conviction. But he didn't. Martin fought back. Consent given, it's go time, and Zimmerman is going to get the beatdown of his pudgy little lifetime.
But wait.
When Zimmerman is on his back, on the ground, there is no ability to retreat. Consent to fight is no longer possible, as the ability to retreat is gone. Martin by being on top of him and pressing him to the ground is at this point, converted under the law, to the agressor and committing assault. At this point, since Zimmerman lacks the capacity to consent to the fight, and is helpless in his current state, he has options at law for defense.
Is there something nearby he can use as a weapon, other than the gun? No. There is some debate as to whether Martin was going for the weapon. If true, Zimmerman is now looking at being on the wrong end of deadly force being used against him with his own weapon. He is absolutely entitled to use "Like Force" meaning he can use deadly force for his own defense.
Ok, let's say Martin didn't go for the weapon at Zimmerman's hip. Instead, he's still getting beaten, and the only thing that happens is he reaches for the gun. That beadown is still happening, he is still only using the force necessary, to preserve his safety by pulling, and pointing the weapon.
The Outcome:
Murder? There was no intent provable. Zimmerman was walking back to his car. Nothing was ever shown that he systematically planned to follow and shoot him, and there was nothing ever shown that proved Zimmerman had intent to shoot him before the fight broke out, and the need for defense was presented.
Manslaughter: Negligence wasn't at issue, and isn't part of the Florida Law. Only Constructive Manslaughter applied in this matter, and Zimmerman had not committed a misdemeanor (or felony for that matter) at the time the gun was drawn.
So regardless of what you think of the outcome, the truth is that the Court, the Jury, and the legal system worked exactly as it should, and this is the correct outcome, despite the tragic and senseless loss of life that could have been prevented had two cooler heads prevailed, and things didn't spiral out of control.
I feel for Martin's parents, and am sorry for their loss. But again, the system worked as it should.
15 out of 15 members liked this post.Last edited by JenniferParisHusband; 07-14-2013 at 11:21 PM.
Jus wookin puh nub.
-
07-14-2013 #15
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 3,113
-
07-15-2013 #16
Re: The George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin Travesty
Zimmerman should had been guilty of manslaughter.
Zimmerman's story doesn't make sense. Zimmerman is much bigger than Martin. Zimmerman is over 100 pounds bigger than Martin. He was the stronger person so I highly doubt Martin was able to put Zimmerman on the ground.
Secondly, there is no way that Zimmerman's head was banged into concrete. His head injuries would had been much worse. His injuries were pretty minor. None of his injuries were life threating.
Thirdly, let's look at Martin's point of view. There is a stranger following him. He is a young teenage who used common sense and tried to run away from Zimmerman. Zimmerman ran after Martin. Again let's look at this from Martin's point of view. What would a teenage think when a stranger is following and running after them? He clearly thought he was in danger.
Look at the facts.
http://thegrio.com/2012/03/19/trayvo...nford-florida/
3 out of 12 members liked this post.
-
07-15-2013 #17
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 3,113
Re: The George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin Travesty
you've got it wrong. zimmerman wasn't following him. he was sitting in his car, noticed martin- martin noticed him, walked around then ran. zimmerman ran after him- was told not to do that, said "okay, i'll go back to the front and wait for the cops and tell them where he ran to" hang up and ran into martin.
0 out of 1 members liked this post.
-
07-15-2013 #18
Re: The George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin Travesty
Hi JPH, could you post this in the other thread also. Wish you had posted this in that thread awhile ago...lol. You will notice that you'd be one of the very few people with a criminal law degree that post in the political section.
This is an emotional case...you will find that some people won't argue the actual definition of the law with you...they will argue according to what they think the law should be....or believe it is. They don't realize that most of them would never have been picked as jurors in this case because of their preconceived notions.
Good luck in your career counselor. BTW...are you a practicing criminal lawyer?
-
07-15-2013 #19
Re: The George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin Travesty
You've contracted yourself in the bold print.
Zimmerman was following him. He was following Martin by driving in his SUV. Martin noticed this and eventually ran when Zimmerman continued to follow him in the SUV. Zimmerman continues following Martin by running after Martin.
0 out of 1 members liked this post.
-
07-15-2013 #20
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 7,916
Re: The George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin Travesty
I just fell on this one...
1 out of 4 members liked this post.
Similar Threads
-
If Malcolm X And Martin Luther King Had Sex...
By Dino Velvet in forum General DiscussionReplies: 46Last Post: 08-28-2013, 03:06 AM -
VIDEO BREAKING NEWS;judge states zimmerman a flight risk
By natina in forum Politics and ReligionReplies: 7Last Post: 07-18-2012, 04:59 AM -
Spain--Travesty Deluxe ?
By jeep77 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 05-16-2011, 11:46 PM -
Martin, Thompson Lead Kings Past Grizzlies
By canihavu in forum Sports LoungeReplies: 0Last Post: 02-21-2009, 07:53 AM -
Martin Helps Kings End Eight-game Skid
By canihavu in forum Sports LoungeReplies: 0Last Post: 02-03-2009, 01:53 AM