Friends in Las Vegas, please check in.

[filghy2]

So the bottom line is that it's irresponsible people that are the problem. Not the alcohol nor the guns!

But for the hypocrites that can't see this, and only want to ban guns (even though alcohol kills more people than guns), well here we go again......

I can't read your posts without thinking of this Monty Python scene http://www.montypython.net/scripts/HG-blkscene.php

[ed_jaxon]

Mods

Move this muthafucking thread to the politics section. Sick of seeing Communist commentary and other political bullshit derail the original intent of the thread.

[nitron]

Move this muthafucking .....2nd the motion!, you 're right.

[filghy2]

Move this muthafucking thread to the politics section. Sick of seeing Communist commentary and other political bullshit derail the original intent of the thread.

I don't care where the thread goes, but why have you got your undies in such a tangle? The original purpose of the thread was limited and seems to have been exhausted early on. The participants are evidently enjoying the discussion, and who exactly is being harmed? Free and open discussion means just that - you or others don't have the right to dictate where the discussion should go.

[MrFanti]

Once again....it's the irresponsible people, not the guns nor is it the alcohol.
But if you want to ban guns and not alcohol you are a hypocrite - especially when "alcohol kills more than guns".

Incredible that you folks are denying it when the evidence is stacked against you...

Mother and daughter killed in Taft Hwy crash, driver arrested for DUI

http://www.turnto23.com/news/local-n...rested-for-dui

[MrFanti]

Mr Fanti, your "your can't ban unless you ban that" argument has been shown conclusiveley here for the nonsense it is.

You just want to have your drink while you are denial of the facts that alcohol kills more people than guns. Almost twice as many people killed by alcohol than by guns. So where is the nonsense really at?

We value our alcohol much more than those 22,073 people killed by alcohol. But we value some lives. We value those 12,632 people who were shot in 2007,

https://davidkessner.wordpress.com/2...d-gun-control/

[MrFanti]

I don't care where the thread goes, but why have you got your undies in such a tangle? The original purpose of the thread was limited and seems to have been exhausted early on. The participants are evidently enjoying the discussion, and who exactly is being harmed? Free and open discussion means just that - you or others don't have the right to dictate where the discussion should go.

Well..It's a private forum own for and paid by Grooby. So the folks at Grooby can really do as they please......

[broncofan]

Edit: It's there now apparently so I guess that was the decision.

[filghy2]

Well, it's obviously still here and only a small part of it is in the other section, which makes it hard to sensibly continue the discussion there.

I actually meant that the complainant (ed_jaxon) did not have the right to dictate what the content of the discussion should be.

[Ts RedVeX]

If you don't want me to call you communists and bandits then stop acting like them, advocating restricting people's freedom.

As to my bizzare interpretation of history, do you seriously believe that holocaust would have even taken place if Jews in Germany had guns?! Do you think that Nazi Germany would have even been an issue if people of Europe had guns?!!! What kind of moronic logic is that?! I'll go even further: maybe WW2 would have been avoided all together if people had guns! ... And even if not, then at least people who were barbarically attacked by the Nazis would have died with dignity defending their lives rather than in Nazi slaughterhouses and ghettos!

People with Alzheimer can take care of themselves to some extent. After that there is family, then come all the other kind-hearded people who feel like helping the disabled out. It is up to those people of good will to decide whether or not to help, not some minister of health to decide for anyone else. - Unless the minister want to help by their own private means.

In a monarchy, if the king really fucks up then there are ways to replace him. It is much easier than replacing 51% of a country's population, which is why communists do not like the system.

This discussion has nothing to do with politics. It is about ideologies.

As to the sketch about Arthur and the Black Knight, both the King had a choice to take a longer route, and the Knight had a choice to step aside.