Results 11 to 20 of 25
-
06-26-2009 #11
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 916
Well I never liked the nonce when he was alive. The shame of it all is that this has overshadowed the sad news about Farrah Fawcett. The world is crying over a billionaire child-molester, rather than the blonde from 'Charlie's Angels' who gave millions of teenage boys wood during the 1970s.
It has been reported that his final wish was that he be melted down and recycled into childrens toys, especially plastic guns, as he would like to be:
"something hard that goes off in little boy's hands"
-
06-26-2009 #12
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Posts
- 356
Re: Whacko Jacko. Kiddy Fiddler. Bankrupt. Crazy Self-Hat
Originally Posted by seanchai
-
06-26-2009 #13
Re: Whacko Jacko. Kiddy Fiddler. Bankrupt. Crazy Self-Hat
Originally Posted by tslvrnyc
-
06-26-2009 #14
Ed McMahon, Farrah Fawcett , and now Michael Jackson ... Damn Death is workin his bony ass off w/ celebs , whos next ?
-
06-26-2009 #15
Re: Whacko Jacko. Kiddy Fiddler. Bankrupt. Crazy Self-Hat
Originally Posted by seanchai
-
06-29-2009 #16
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 62
i'm with you seanchai. people wanna get a piece of his fame.
-
06-29-2009 #17
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- NYC
- Posts
- 418
I think he was too good and innocent to hurt a kid that way.. even if he was tempted, the complexity that is michael jackson will remain
-
06-29-2009 #18
Re: Whacko Jacko. Kiddy Fiddler. Bankrupt. Crazy Self-Hat
Originally Posted by Norma
One comment to make to Norma, 27 posts in 2 years?? Come on, this a second account. Who are you really
-
06-29-2009 #19
Honestly... who knows what really happened. I think it should be obvious to everyone that he had some psychological issues going on.
-
06-29-2009 #20
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Posts
- 246
I'll agree he was rather weird, and didn't like his nose or skin color, and apparently was a regressed child, but I'll suspend judgement on the "kiddy fiddler" charge. Part of the evidence suggests it, but it could also be he was, as Jackson himself said, a "Peter Pan" who never wanted to grow up -- which is indeed weird but not necessarily a child molester. You have to go by hard evidence. Where is it ? Let's remember there were two trials, a civil and a criminal. The civil trial was settled out-of-court for $22M and might have been about money (who knows ?), and in the criminal trial he was acquitted of all charges. The reason I make a big deal of this is that too many want to assume "guilty until proven innocent" when a charge is made. But again, if you have the evidence, or know better, let's hear it.