View Poll Results: How great a scientist is Al Gore compared to White_Male_Canada?
- Voters
- 7. You may not vote on this poll
-
White_Male_Canada makes Al Gore look like Albert Einstein
0 0% -
White_Male_Canada makes Al Gore look like Charles Darwin
0 0% -
White_Male_Canada makes Al Gore look like Stephen Hawking
0 0% -
White_Male_Canada makes Al Gore look like all of the above great scientists
1 14.29% -
Forget Al Gore, White_Male_Canada is just one dumb fuck!
6 85.71%
Results 11 to 20 of 111
-
05-25-2007 #11
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 181
Originally Posted by North_of_60
-
05-25-2007 #12
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 1,216
anybody want to bet how long it will be until rodgers cant take the stupidity anymore?
Elvis: I was dreamin'. Dreamin' my dick was out and I was checkin' to see if that infected bump on the head of it had filled with pus again. If it had, I was gonna name it after my ex-wife 'cilla and bust it by jackin' off.
-
05-25-2007 #13Originally Posted by North_of_60
The WHOLE truth is that the overwhelming greenhouse gas is water vapor, probably 30 to 50 times more important than CO2. The CO2 attributed to man is minuscule, about 6 to 7 PgC/yr into an atmospheric reservoir variously estimated between 720 and 760 PgC. Water—as a gas, not a condensate or cloud—is the major radiative absorbing–emitting gas (averaging 95%) in the atmosphere, and not CO2. The dominant source and sink for CO2 are the oceans, accounting for about two-thirds of the exchange, with vegetation as the major secondary source and sink, not man-made CO2, only 3.4 to 5% is man-made. CO2 as a result of man's activities is only about 0.12% of the greenhouse gases in total.
When people abandon the truth, they don’t believe in nothing, they believe in anything.
-
05-25-2007 #14Originally Posted by muhmuh
Still, if the pattern holds, Rogers we'll go through the same cycle as every other poster who takes part in the P&R forum – eventually arriving at the conclusion that WMC is both delusional and deceptive in the extreme.
When even the forum’s mods are laughing at you – as was the case the other day for poor WMC – you've become little more than a cautionary tale for other would be baffle wits.
-Quinn
Life is essentially one long Benny Hill skit punctuated by the occasional Anne Frank moment.
-
05-27-2007 #15
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 666
Yawn, indeed, _Canada. I was starting to fall asleep long before the end of your last post, and it would seem that so were you whilst you were typing it. You do tend to prattle on a bit, perhaps that's what muhmuh and Quinn are on about? I will say this for you, _Canada, you seem to know far too much, far too well, to be just a layman. The reason there are many errors in what you are saying is simple, it’s not because you don’t know what your saying, it’s because you have to lie to back up your arguments, because the evidence for AGW is now so strong. I’m right, aren’t I?
Originally Posted by White_Male_Canada
Originally Posted by White_Male_Canada
Originally Posted by White_Male_Canada
CHECK-MATE, _CANADA, AND IN ONLY FOUR MOVES!!!!
From some of the signatures I've seen here , _Canada, it would appear that you are easy in ways other than in just debating. ROTFLMAO. On the subject of climate change, try arguing against what AGW scientists actually say, rather than trying to put false statements in their mouths. That is what politicians do, not scientists, but it’s clear that it’s politics that are driving your posts here. Unfortunately for you, however, you can’t argue without using lies, half-truths, simplifications and straw men, because that’s all skeptics have.
-
05-27-2007 #16
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 666
-
05-27-2007 #17
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 666
Originally Posted by trish
-
05-27-2007 #18So lets get this right, ice cores are alright if they back up your arguments, but not if they support others?
This is not a theory, its hard physics. The air trapped in snow needs a certain pressure above it before the bubbles form... the air in the bubbles can be hundreds or even thousands of years younger than the ice in which it is trapped.
Pfft~ Making me laugh now junior.
Ice core pressures below a certain depth force gases to transform into solid clathrates. Drilling cores decompress calthrates, decompression leads to sheeting, sheeting leads to solid clathrate decomposition which leads to CO2/O2/N2 escaping into the drilling liquids which means, concentrations appear lower.
Above the depth of clathrate formation CO2 levels were found to be "too high" and were ahem, adjusted. The fact you are unaware of the subtlety of the argument makes an exhange of ideas, ideas you are unaware of, taxing, painstaking and boring.
I have already agreed with you that CO2 usually seems to lag temperature, and there is no climate scientist that I know of that says otherwise. The link I first posted concurs. You, however, have proved the point I was trying to make on this thread; that climate skeptics use this as a straw man against AGW…
Nonsense, calculations have already demonstrated that spending billions if not trillions to redistribute wealth(Kyoto), creating a precursor to a command and control economy, to reduce the earth`s temperature by about 0.003055225 °C by the year 2050 or so, is not only impractical it`s insane.
You know well that we cannot match precisely our current climate with any in the past...
Here, “ let`s make the atmospheric data fit our agw agenda too. We`ll cherry pick our data to make it appear CO2 average was 292 ppmv instead of the real average of 335 ppmv ”
When people abandon the truth, they don’t believe in nothing, they believe in anything.
-
05-27-2007 #19
You really better practice more before making futile attempts:
http://www.amazon.com/Chess-Dummies-.../dp/0764550039
Nice try junoir but your AGW religion is a running joke.
When people abandon the truth, they don’t believe in nothing, they believe in anything.
-
05-27-2007 #20
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- Out there somewhere...
- Posts
- 2,808
Originally Posted by White_Male_Canada
Too small, you say? Well, here's the thing: these are only estimates, mostly conservative ones made by conservatives, and Kyoto is only a first step, anyway.
Navin R. Johnson: You mean I'm going to stay this color??
Mother: I'd love you if you were the color of a baboon's ass.