Results 41 to 44 of 44
-
01-15-2016 #41
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Location
- Sacramento
- Posts
- 1,676
-
01-15-2016 #42
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 794
Re: Seanchai you should check her out
I just think she very unhappy with her life, job and now found somewhere to take it out on. She's living in a dream world where she's in denial that she is as much a porn actress as the next one. Denial is a horrible thing.
1 out of 1 members liked this post.
-
01-15-2016 #43
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
- Midlands UK. Sometimes Leicester.
- Posts
- 939
Re: Seanchai you should check her out
If you want to point out how I am incorrect then debate the actual statements I discussed not one of them and another section of what she said. I quite clearly quoted so you knew what I meant - perhaps you need to "read all that [I] wrote again and perhaps again after that".
Also you don't seem to be able to finish your first point: "This isn't the first time nor will it be the last time that you comment on things without ." Er without what exactly? The right word at the end of the sentence perhaps, or any word for that matter?
But then to be fair I shouldn't be that bothered by the opinion of someone who says "milks" in the context you used it either to be fair; your ability to proof read seems a little lacking. Your dairy industry analogy is also utterly irrelevant to the point I made which I will now make clear to you again if possible.
She said: "I have zero issue with porn stars and any trans girl doing her thing gets my vote." But followed this by saying to Christian (a porn star) "you're getting the props while whichever girl you're with is getting degraded by society". Those two things contradict each other. She has no issues with porn stars but suggests they are degrading T-girl performers by working with them? She also follows this up by stating that "You can be attracted to trans women and still be transphobic. When you put that dick in that girl, the doors of her future start shutting while your life stays the same." A statement which Christian already laughed off for its ridiculousness.
Supporting freedom of choice but not agreeing with the choice is fine. Saying you don't have issues with what someone does and then going on to insult them and what they do isn't fine - it's a contradiction.
If she was engaged in any other profession her statements might carry some idea of sense but she is a cam-girl, she works in the porn industry yet chooses to come here and knock those who also choose to work in that industry but do different things within it. Maybe she is secretly annoyed they earn more than she does - maybe not - there is still no need to knock them for their choices.
The point is there is nothing wrong with working in porn if you so choose but to act like you are better because you choose a different type of porn would be like suggesting that it's fine to drink milk but degrading to drink Chocolate milk. There's an analogy that actually works.
Before I came here I was confused about this subject. Having listened to your lecture I am still confused. But on a higher level. Enrico Fermi
I confused things with their names: that is belief. Jean-Paul Sartre
-
01-25-2016 #44
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 66
Similar Threads
-
HEY SEANCHAI
By GroobySteven in forum General DiscussionReplies: 5Last Post: 11-02-2014, 07:44 AM -
HAY SEANCHAI
By gunn in forum General DiscussionReplies: 3Last Post: 11-10-2007, 03:59 AM -
Seanchai-help if you can
By tommytuu in forum General DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: 03-17-2005, 12:37 AM -
OK SEANCHAI..U STARTED IT...MEGA VS SEANCHAI PIC CONTEST
By GroobySteven in forum General DiscussionReplies: 4Last Post: 01-29-2004, 08:58 PM