Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    5 Star Poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,011

    Default Reuters drops Photog/Fake PicsQana(Reuters)

    Reuters drops freelance Lebanese photographer over image
    06 Aug 2006 20:06:11 GMT
    Source: Reuters
    http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L06301298.htm
    LONDON, Aug 6 (Reuters) - Reuters, the global news and information agency, told a freelance Lebanese photographer on Sunday it would not use any more of his pictures after he doctored an image of the aftermath of an Israeli air strike on Beirut.

    The photograph by Adnan Hajj, which was published on news Web sites on Saturday, showed thick black smoke rising above buildings in the Lebanese capital after an Israeli air raid in the war with the Shi'ite Islamic group Hizbollah, now in its fourth week.

    Reuters withdrew the doctored image on Sunday and replaced it with the unaltered photograph after several news blogs said it had been manipulated using Photoshop software to show more smoke.

    Reuters has strict standards of accuracy that bar the manipulation of images in ways that mislead the viewer. So strict they published obvious fakes until exposed by bloggers !!!


    Dan Rather work for Reuters now,or just the usual propaganda?

    http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/184203.php

    August 06, 2006
    Reuters Doctoring Beirut Photos (Updated)


    The photo below is attributed to Adnan Hajj, of the Reuters news agency. The photo alleges to show smoke covering the Beirut sky. The problem with the photo is that it is that it has been doctored to make it appear that an Israeli missile strike did much more damage than it actually did.

    Adnan Hajj also took the photos of dead children at Qana. Allegations have arisen that the Qana photos were part of a staged event put on by Hezbollah operatives.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Reuters news agency admitted on Sunday that it had digitally altered a photograph of an Israeli attack on Lebanon on Saturday, showing more smoke than was actually present.

    The photograph, as initially published, showed an aerial view of Beirut after an IAF attack, with two large pillars of smoke rising over the city. The caption read: Smoke billows from burning buildings destroyed during an overnight Israeli air raid on Beirut's suburbs.

    The agency has since withdrawn the photograph, issued an apology and released the unaltered picture. Its public relations department said the photographer had been suspended until the investigation was completed.
    httpww.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1154525816599&pagename=JPost%2FJPArt icle%2FShowFull
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Reuters admits altering Beirut photo


    Reuters withdraws photograph of Beirut after Air Force attack after US blogs, photographers point out 'blatant evidence of manipulation.' Reuters' head of PR says in response, 'Reuters has suspended photographer until investigations are completed into changes made to photograph.' Photographer who sent altered image is same Reuters photographer behind many of images from Qana, which have also been subject of suspicions for being staged
    http://ww.ynetnews.com/articles/0,73...286966,00.html

    Fake but accurate:
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	rather_visgaitis_187.jpg 
Views:	636 
Size:	99.7 KB 
ID:	54066   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20060805beirutphotoshop03reuters_526.gif 
Views:	642 
Size:	59.6 KB 
ID:	54067  



  2. #2
    Veteran Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    667

    Default

    Nope, just the usual propaganda from you.



  3. #3
    5 Star Poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,011

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsluver247
    Nope, just the usual propaganda from you.
    Must be,since Reuters did not pull the photos and jerk the "photographers" credentials, NOT :P

    Burns don`t it ? Hurts. Enraging and frusting huh ?

    heh-heh



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •