Unpleasant girls

[Jericho]

Vodka up!
btw, is it me or you that "suckshorsecock" doesn't like?

[Jericho]

Thanks, Eva! You get what I was saying.

I got what you were saying.
But, She probably replied a lot more coherently that i did.
Sorry for calling you a cock (I'm British, think of it as a term of endearment)!

[GroobySteven]

Are you really this dense, or are you just being obtuse?
Seriously?

What are you so uptight about?
If someone spent money on a product, and didn't think it was good - then why shouldn't they talk about it.
If anyone is being this dense, it's you and Tapatio.
They're entitled to their opinions as long as it isn't slanderous. It's not as if they were expecting something for nothing.

[Jericho]

They're entitled to their opinions as long as it isn't slanderous. It's not as if they were expecting something for nothing.

The only thing I'm uptight about is that I'm stuck in the fucking house all weekend! So cams are a distraction.

Of course people are entitled to their opinions.
But, for fucks sake, unsubstantiated claims of shit performance?
Surely, you want more/better than this?

Or, are the stats down, and we need some salvage?

[Ms.Stepford]

I used to keep a newspaper in cabinets under my bed because this one dude would take me to exclusive sessions and pay four bucks a minute to watch me roll around in it.

I didn't care what I had to take off or put on, since I was making $1.40 a minute.

[EvaCassini]

Vodka up!
btw, is it me or you that "suckshorsecock" doesn't like?

Huh? Who? lol

[GroobySteven]

The only thing I'm uptight about is that I'm stuck in the fucking house all weekend! So cams are a distraction.

Of course people are entitled to their opinions.
But, for fucks sake, unsubstantiated claims of shit performance?
Surely, you want more/better than this?

Or, are the stats down, and we need some salvage?

Stats aren't down - but membership might be down by one if you want to keep making those claims.
It's un-substantiated but not slanderous and there is a right to reply. The same on the escort review forum. Simply blocking or banning anyone who says anything bad about a service, isn't productive. I don't block comments or criticisms about my products, I answer them, until they become slanderous (see your above comment).

[Jericho]

Stats aren't down - but membership might be down by one if you want to keep making those claims.
It's un-substantiated but not slanderous and there is a right to reply. The same on the escort review forum. Simply blocking or banning anyone who says anything bad about a service, isn't productive. I don't block comments or criticisms about my products, I answer them, until they become slanderous (see your above comment).

From my very first post in this thread, all i have asked is that if someone is going to slag a girl off, back it up, elaborate.
Otherwise, expect people to call it bullshit!

Simply blocking or banning anyone who says anything bad about a service, isn't productive.

Of course it isn't!
Who's asking for that?

I like this place.
I have no desire to be banned.
If you feel I've slandered you, i apologise.
But, (apart from the stats thing) i stand by my viewpoint.

[ed_jaxon]

I for one would love to see someone get a salvage beating.

[Ms.Stepford]

I for one would love to see someone get a salvage beating.

Like with scrap metal?