Shemale Time Magazine

[Star Angel 86]

Very nice. Similar to Evil Angel's Exxxtra Parts well done

I wish EA would do another issue with a sampler DVD but I doubt that will happen since stagliano quit publishing Buttman mag

Well done

I would like to see that too unfortunately like you said John Stagliano owner of Evil Angel stopped publishing his excellent Buttman Magazine with his final issue with Volume 17 NO 1,proud owner of each and every Magazine 1998 -2014 !!!!

[Torris]

lol. you are not smart. yes, it is a porn forum but it is a rather silly idea and what i said is far more supportive of transgender issues than your contribution to this thread.

Why is it silly? bc the original poster is a GG(assuming). I think this thread has been great

[catherinefan]

A lot of threads on this forum could be described as silly.
Personally, I enjoy the creativeness on display here.

Only thing I don't really like is the title of the magazine.
I'm just not fond of terms like " shemale" and "ladyboy".
Find them to be somewhat disrespectful.

How about "transwoman"s Times".
Or perhaps just "Trans Times".

[Charly Spoons]

Hello, I just wanted to add my support to this thread. Its some good, creative fun. Nothing beats random internet art.

A request to joanne_sven, how about featuring this honey...

PRISCILLA DANDARA

[luvhungangels]

I am SO upset with this thread. I cannot find a way to make a calendar of it..!!!

Thanks for GREAT entertainment. BTW I am saving for tickets to that planet..

[PEPE3Z]

Joanne Sven, very nice job, I love it !!!

[RallyCola]

Why is it silly? bc the original poster is a GG(assuming). I think this thread has been great

why is it silly?

1) the use of a pejorative term to describe transwomen
2) the overt need for sexual innuendo in the captions that again reduces transwomen from women to sex objects
3) the rather poor efforts at photoshopping a cover together.

does this thread add levity to the board...to some members, it might. i am not saying the thread should not exist nor am i saying the OP is doing anything wrong, but i stand by my original point...i'd welcome the day where a transwomen was featured on Time magazine for some reason other than their gender disposition. that is acceptance. Torris...you are the one that disagreed with my rather supportive sentiment. that is all.

also, your assertion that the gender of the OP has anything to do with my judgement of the thread is actually far more silly than anything else about this thread. at least you are here for comic relief.

[Charly Spoons]

@RallyCola Stop acting like a tortoise just bit your finger an chill out.

[Torris]

why is it silly?

1) the use of a pejorative term to describe transwomen
2) the overt need for sexual innuendo in the captions that again reduces transwomen from women to sex objects
3) the rather poor efforts at photoshopping a cover together.

does this thread add levity to the board...to some members, it might. i am not saying the thread should not exist nor am i saying the OP is doing anything wrong, but i stand by my original point...i'd welcome the day where a transwomen was featured on Time magazine for some reason other than their gender disposition. that is acceptance. Torris...you are the one that disagreed with my rather supportive sentiment. that is all.

also, your assertion that the gender of the OP has anything to do with my judgement of the thread is actually far more silly than anything else about this thread. at least you are here for comic relief.

Methinks you doth protest too much.

Whatever, Mr. White Knight

[Torris]

why is it silly?

1) the use of a pejorative term to describe transwomen
2) the overt need for sexual innuendo in the captions that again reduces transwomen from women to sex objects
3) the rather poor efforts at photoshopping a cover together.

does this thread add levity to the board...to some members, it might. i am not saying the thread should not exist nor am i saying the OP is doing anything wrong, but i stand by my original point...i'd welcome the day where a transwomen was featured on Time magazine for some reason other than their gender disposition. that is acceptance. Torris...you are the one that disagreed with my rather supportive sentiment. that is all.

also, your assertion that the gender of the OP has anything to do with my judgement of the thread is actually far more silly than anything else about this thread. at least you are here for comic relief.

1)pejorative description of transwomenn a site where every other thread calls these gals "trannies". Including by the guy who owns it. Ergo"Tranny Chaser"
2)reducing transwomen to objects on a PORN appreciation site. Someone call Gloria Steinem!
3) hyper criticism of a satirical fun post bc it might have been done by GG. I mention that bc GG's have sent me private messages saying how this site has a bit of a reputation of being hostile/passive aggressive to GG postings and submissions. Thus stifling others from posting similar clever threads
4) I am 100% behind the human rights of transgendered everywhere! but as a relatively new member I come to hungangels for insights on gorgeous tgirls who fuck and suck and take cock in their various holes

I'm glad you think I am here for comic relief (like I could give a fuck one way or the other). But I have seen this groupthink dynamic in action before

I used to be a regular on Adult DVD Talk and left there when I made a casual suggestion that Kristina Rose would be a good GG performer paired up with Tgirls. She called me a fucking asshole, idiot the whole gamut

When I called her on her obvious homophobia the magpies flew at me currying favor with her and piled on. Whatever. why stay where you aren't wanted. So I quit using their affiliate links to buy - yes, buy - my porn

So feel free to spare me your righteous indignation as the arbiter of what counts as acceptable versus pejorative on a PORN site.

Your hissy fit over Joanne's submission speaks to some sort of hidden agenda. I just don't know your posting dynamic well enough to figure out what that is. If I even cared, which I don't. In my real life I am used to being the skunk at the garden party. So be it

Because what I care about on Hungangels? Finding gorgeous and depraved Tgirls who suck, fuck and eat cum

If a tgirl civilian wins a Nobel Prize someday, I will be among the chorus to say, Bravo

But I am 99% here to wallow in objectifying Tgirl Pornstars for their fucking and sucking skills. Not for their humanity.

And I spend the GDP of A third world nation on porn and 3/4 of that has shifted to Tgirl smut. I was recommended to come here to discover insights and learn a little what makes these gals tick. Not seek approval from those of you with 100,000 posts who think they know it all or get to sit in judgment on what posts are pejorative

Not interested so much in currying favor or playing White Knight sycophant. I just wanna bust a nut and Het porn ain't cutting it anymore for me

The quality and requisite anal I require to de-stress from my cutthroat job and fall asleep without Ambien at night is from the ever more fetching and sexually permissive Tgirl set. They get my money

Over and out!