Results 271 to 280 of 303
-
04-13-2016 #271
-
04-13-2016 #272
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Posts
- 3,563
Re: The Concept Of Being "God Fearing"
As to what you mean by the "WRONG side of the moral fence" you'll have to elaborate.
Until you post photos, I'll just have to use my imagination.
Why are you people arguing with the world, the world is PERFECT. Even with it's flaws.
I can prove it.
There.
World Class Asshole
-
04-13-2016 #273
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- The United Fuckin' States of America
- Posts
- 13,898
Re: The Concept Of Being "God Fearing"
The World clarifies it's position when you engage it in argument and it thereby imparts its perfection.
"...I no longer believe that people's secrets are defined and communicable, or their feelings full-blown and easy to recognize."_Alice Munro, Chaddeleys and Flemings.
"...the order in creation which you see is that which you have put there, like a string in a maze, so that you shall not lose your way". _Judge Holden, Cormac McCarthy's, BLOOD MERIDIAN.
-
04-14-2016 #274
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Posts
- 3,563
-
04-14-2016 #275
-
04-14-2016 #276
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 13,557
Re: The Concept Of Being "God Fearing"
Although I agree with a lot, indeed most of what you write, there is a gaping hole in your argument -if what you say about morals is true, why have human societies developed such elaborate religious systems of belief that make moral judgements about what it is right and wrong to believe, why some activities are good or bad, what is selfish behaviour and what is good for society as a whole? Why are there so many rituals in religion based around times of the week, or year; or recollections of and symbolic repetitions of sacrifice, or phenomenal events or shows of reverence for individuals long dead? Why are there so many detailed lists of rules on sexual behaviour, on diet, and on issues related to kinship and property? If we do not need a religion or its 'sacred texts' -let alone its clerics- to tell us how to live and what to believe, why have religions been so fundamental to the human experience?
There is no simple answer to this, and attempts to answer it range far and wide. There is, for example, the evidence from archaeology and anthropology which suggests that rules on sexual behaviour became fundamental to human existence when early humans -possibly through their mating with neanderthals and other humanoids- realised that unrestricted sexual behaviour led to the propagation of sexually transmitted diseases with all its complications and death; that procreation within the family led to genetic deterioation and thus threatened the very survival of the family and the wider community. Religious thought and practice at this level imposed a group-based moral code on individuals to prevent the extinction of the group, because individuals did apparently need to be warned off the perils of sexual temptation and an apocalyptic religious verse in this case may actually have been close to the truth even if the subsequent journey to heaven or hell is not. But here one notes what a Dante scholar once wrote about the Inferno, the Italian poet's depiction of a journey through Hell -that it was not written as a warning of what might come but a chastening experience of what actually exists, in the here and now.
Another perspective from anthropology and philosophy formed part of the early work of Lévi-Strauss for whom the study of Amazonian myths and rituals led him to a comparative study of language and ritual, whether it was the various ways in which humans denote their kinship through language or the reason why humans eat cooked as well as raw food. Embedded in the human experience there may be structural affinities with all humans- Lévi-Strauss was influenced by Roman Jakobson just as in recent years Habermas has taken this aspect of language and behaviour further in an attempt to discern in human societies a 'universal pragmatics'. What these studies tend to look at is what it is that unites humans, but they could just as well engage in comparative theology to discern what it is that unites all the major religions, where surely the emphasis on a rule-based form of behaviour is the most common, for religions appear to come laden with rules.
If these issues are important, it may be because of the way in which human societies have changed since the Neolithic. The transition from a nomadic to a sedentary life has not been complete, but one notes that the Bedouin of the Middle East always considered themselves superior to sedentary farmers, associating their freedom of movement with freedom from government and the entrapments of taxation and conscription even if these days they participate in the modern state. When Cain killed Abel, it was a sedentary farmer growing crops with no animals to sacrifice, murdering his nomadic brother, who did. Embedded in that confrontation the modern world comes alive in which two brothers fall apart over resentment, and what it is that each other does or does not possess. Religion thus becomes in this context the rule-book that establishes what property rights are in a society and culture where possession matters, and once you have a stability of possession -'this land is my land'- you can see the development of a sense of belonging, and by extension group identity, an identity buttressed by shared beliefs, shared rituals, and shared outcomes of work. Out of that too, must come social stratification of the kind that enables some crafty humans not to work for a living, but to 're-invent' themselves as Kings, or Pharaohs and thus get other people to feed them and clothe them.
In other words, while we may not agree on the reasons why, it is clear that elaborate religious thought and behaviour has indeed been the means whereby crucial rules on sexual behaviour, diet, property rights and kinship have been developed to maintain the species. To wish all that away because we can see how obvious morals are without the apparatus of religion, seems to me to wish away thousands of years of culture that may yet have more to tell us about who we are and why we are asked to 'fear god' or 'love god' or ignore God altogether. Because ultimately it is about us, and how we have used language to seek dominion over the earth -and each other.
1 out of 1 members liked this post.
-
04-14-2016 #277
Re: The Concept Of Being "God Fearing"
A few thoughts
Many other animals exhibit altruistic behaviour, social hierarchies, seemingly meaningless rituals and other aspects, which we would normally associate with religion. So what makes us different? May be the knowledge of our own mortality. This knowledge produces an unbearable emotional drain.
Was religion (which grew out of the proto-humans in Africa – sorry, but we are all descended from Africans) was a response to fear. We, as a unique species, were self-conscious, had long-term memories, and above all had language that could express abstract thoughts and allow oral traditions to develop. These developing abilities of proto-humans were a double-edge sword. On the one hand, they aided their chances of surviving in a cruel and unpredictable world. They helped each successive generation to build upon the knowledge base of their ancestors.
Religions were created to give people a feeling of security in an insecure world, and a feeling of control over the environment where there was little control.
During our evolution from proto-human to homo sapiens, we developed questions about ourselves and our environment:
What controlled the seasonal cycles of nature - the daily motion of the sun; the motion of the stars, the passing of the seasons, etc.
What controlled their environment - what or who caused floods, rains, dry spells, storms?
What controls fertility -- of the tribe, its animals, and its crops?
What system of morality would best promote the success of the tribe?
And above all: what happens to us after we die?
Living in a pre-scientific society, people had no way to resolve these questions.
But the need for answers (particularly to the last question) were so important that some response was required, even if they were merely based on hunches. Some people within the tribe invented answers based on their personal guesses. Thus developed:
The first religious belief system,
The first priesthood,
The first set of rituals to appease the Goddess – usually a female deity (there lies fertility),
Other rituals to control fertility and other aspects of the environment,
A set of behavioral expectations for members of the tribe, and
A set of moral truths to govern human behavior.
These formed an oral tradition which was disseminated among the members of the tribe and was taught to each new generation. Much later, after writing developed, the beliefs were generally recorded in written form. A major loss of flexibility resulted. Oral traditions can evolve over time; written documents tend to be more permanent.
Unfortunately, because these belief systems were based on hunches, the various religions that developed in different areas of the world were, and remain, different. Their teachings are in conflict with each other. Because the followers of most religions considered their beliefs to be derived directly from God, they cannot be easily changed. Thus, inter-religious compromise is difficult or impossible.
Religious texts are often ambiguous, so divisions developed within religions. Different denominations, schools, or traditions have derived different meanings from the same texts. Thus were laid the foundations for inter-religious and intra-religious conflict.
1 out of 1 members liked this post.Avatar is not representative of the available product - contents may differ
-
04-14-2016 #278
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- The United Fuckin' States of America
- Posts
- 13,898
Re: The Concept Of Being "God Fearing"
The various religious proscriptions restricting human sexuality may have (and may still) somewhat function to minimize the transmission of disease, maximize fertility and the chances of tribal survival through the generations. If so, nevertheless “because God says so” is not the reason they function in this way. That “diseases are caused by demons or sent by angry gods” is not a viable hypothesis. If we wish to refine and develop more effective prophylactic behaviors and measures against the spread of disease, we need to understand (indeed we do understand) the real causes of disease. The question then becomes, is it still moral to use the fear of God as a way to enforce (or at least encourage) safer sexual practices? I think not.
God was never a real hypothesis, for the hypothesis of His existence entails nothing without additional ad-hoc assumptions. “God exists” doesn’t entail that a woman shouldn’t cuckold her husband. “God exists and He doesn’t want women to cuckold their husbands and if you disobey Him you will be eternally punished” does. You need some variant of all three components to get the entailment. Though the proscriptions of religion may have survived and evolved to serve a useful function for the tribe, they are as ad-hoc as thumbs and appendices. Some proscriptions still function well and some no longer serve any function at all. Some may even misfire and do real damage. Other than the shape they are given by their social evolution and the fiction that they spring from a common source (the will of the gods) the laws of religion have no coherence; certainly no logical coherence.
Fear of God was always just a way to motivate people to follow the laws of the tribe (whether those laws serve the tribe well or not). This is not to say the history of religion isn’t valuable. Just because we choose now not to follow an ancient collection of tribal laws doesn’t mean we have to forget who we were and from where we came. To appreciate our culture and understand our history, we don’t have to believe the same silly things our ancestors believed or live by the same standards. Indeed, if we wish to propagate our culture into the future, we have to acknowledge that some of our old ideas and practices were wrong and obstructive. We don’t have to burn our history books or destroy our religious texts and artifacts; but neither do we have to furnish our moral space with uncomfortable antiques.
1 out of 1 members liked this post."...I no longer believe that people's secrets are defined and communicable, or their feelings full-blown and easy to recognize."_Alice Munro, Chaddeleys and Flemings.
"...the order in creation which you see is that which you have put there, like a string in a maze, so that you shall not lose your way". _Judge Holden, Cormac McCarthy's, BLOOD MERIDIAN.
-
04-14-2016 #279
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Posts
- 3,563
Re: The Concept Of Being "God Fearing"
Whoa, you guys are not talking God, you're talking SOCIETY.
If I were up on that cross looking down at the crowd, I might have thought...
"Gee, maybe they weren't ready for God yet...."
Who wouldn't?
JESUS!!!! That's who!!!!!!
Even on his worst day he was enlightened.
Is eternal peace an illusion???
Was all that homework I did in school a complete waste of time?
It wouldn't be too hard to "play" this crowd, if it amused me I could write a post that got 10 thumbs up or 10 thumbs down. The only people who really agree with gays and trannys are other gays and trannys. WORD!!! (uh oh, thumbs down, Claudius)
It hurts my eyes to look up directly into the sun, but I'm glad it there, warming us all.
The Universe has one God,
The World has one KING..........
World Class Asshole
-
04-14-2016 #280
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- The United Fuckin' States of America
- Posts
- 13,898
Re: The Concept Of Being "God Fearing"
Even on his worst day he was enlightened.
1 out of 1 members liked this post."...I no longer believe that people's secrets are defined and communicable, or their feelings full-blown and easy to recognize."_Alice Munro, Chaddeleys and Flemings.
"...the order in creation which you see is that which you have put there, like a string in a maze, so that you shall not lose your way". _Judge Holden, Cormac McCarthy's, BLOOD MERIDIAN.
Similar Threads
-
Nyc sat nite allanah starr"s "trannyquest" tonite "tranny patch" pre halloweeni
By sandymichelle in forum General DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 10-27-2012, 09:33 PM -
NYC-THIS "Wed Sept 19" Return "XXX"Adult Star "Persia Lace" & Fabiola Blonde(Frm SoFl
By sandymichelle in forum General DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 09-18-2012, 04:39 PM -
NYC-MON FEB 27"FROM SPAIN-SINGING SINSATION "NICOLE" W "MONALISA" Drag Performer
By sandymichelle in forum General DiscussionReplies: 4Last Post: 02-28-2012, 12:01 AM -
Nyc wed ts party "sizzling!" "3" adult film star dancers-bottle area-sexy girls
By sandymichelle in forum General DiscussionReplies: 6Last Post: 12-15-2011, 04:56 AM -
Nyc wed ts party "sizzling!" "3" adult film star dancers-bottle area-sexy girls-lap
By sandymichelle in forum General DiscussionReplies: 4Last Post: 12-08-2011, 01:42 AM