Hmmmm...

[iagodelgado]

Why does everyone bang on about Photoshop when they don't use it for anything significant?

It is tough - TOUGH - to slim calves, carve a little off the back, or the front, or make the whatsits look bigger without taking hours to days over it. That is why NO ONE does it, apart from big selling magazines.

What has happened here?

The person might have been - doing a simple brightness adjustment - doing a simple contrast adjustment - doing a simple saturation adjustment. Maybe even just sticking the logo on.

Possibly turning too much flash on the camera down.

And all he has fucked up is hitting the left button on his mouse, whilst the paint icon is in pure white, whilst trying to mouse down to the OK button.

It´s a line of white paint, or a line a white pencil. Nothing more, nothing less. Fail rather than success. But nothing more.

Please feel free to hit my friend the red thumb.

PS Have you looked at my profile recently? I'm trying to get the profile views up to 2,000. PLEASE DONATE.

[GroobyKrissy]

Why does everyone bang on about Photoshop when they don't use it for anything significant?

It is tough - TOUGH - to slim calves, carve a little off the back, or the front, or make the whatsits look bigger without taking hours to days over it. That is why NO ONE does it, apart from big selling magazines.

What has happened here?

The person might have been - doing a simple brightness adjustment - doing a simple contrast adjustment - doing a simple saturation adjustment. Maybe even just sticking the logo on.

Possibly turning too much flash on the camera down.

And all he has fucked up is hitting the left button on his mouse, whilst the paint icon is in pure white, whilst trying to mouse down to the OK button.

It´s a line of white paint, or a line a white pencil. Nothing more, nothing less. Fail rather than success. But nothing more.

Please feel free to hit my friend the red thumb.

PS Have you looked at my profile recently? I'm trying to get the profile views up to 2,000. PLEASE DONATE.

It's not really that tough to edit pictures... once you get good at it, you can do a set in a few hours of work. Altering curves is one of the easiest photo-manipulations you can do with newer editions of PS (CS5 and CS6).

This is definitely an attempt to "correct" the picture and not simply a mistake. It is a pre-edit line for reference before blending. There is no way you make a line like that, following a curve as precisely as that... "on accident". Like I said, I'm not bagging on the editors who did this or people who use Photoshop, I was just curious about guys noticing... seems they don't since no one mentioned it until I did.

You need cock shots in your profile if you want girls to look. I already said that emphatically. No cock shot = no profile view. Period. I'm serious. Maybe. OK, not at all. Well, a little.

[CORVETTEDUDE]

OK... doesn't look like anyone is noticing what I noticed. Look for the white line on the calf... someone released this picture with some Photoshop lines in it. I was just curious to know if from a guy's perspective... does shaving off that extra, tiny little bit of calf really matter THAT much? Also, back, stomach... look like they've been shaved off too.

I think I've seen some non-PS pictures of Blondie Johnson... no way she needs any help. She is beautiful, so not posting this picture to bag on her / editors for using PS... I really like her stuff.

Just curious if guys really care that much? I think another thread was all about Danni Daniels and wrecking the illusion... doesn't over PS'ing do the same thing for you guys? Just curious.

Since you've pointed it out, I agree there has been some "personalization" done to this pic. I have a bunch of photos of Blondie and, again agree, she doesn't need the help. However, everyone has their own opinions of what looks good or, flips their switch. Like the old saying goes.... "Opinions are like assholes, everybody's got one!"

I'll gladly take a roll in the hay with both you and Blondie ANY DAY!!!

[iagodelgado]

It's not really that tough to edit pictures... once you get good at it, you can do a set in a few hours of work. Altering curves is one of the easiest photo-manipulations you can do with newer editions of PS (CS5 and CS6).

This is definitely an attempt to "correct" the picture and not simply a mistake. It is a pre-edit line for reference before blending. There is no way you make a line like that, following a curve as precisely as that... "on accident". Like I said, I'm not bagging on the editors who did this or people who use Photoshop, I was just curious about guys noticing... seems they don't since no one mentioned it until I did.

You need cock shots in your profile if you want girls to look. I already said that emphatically. No cock shot = no profile view. Period. I'm serious. Maybe. OK, not at all. Well, a little.

It is fucking TOUGH to manipulate curves in any of the curves in ANY photo manipulation software.

See the bowl behind her manipulated calf? A perfect, non-manipulated bowl.

See the tiles behind her back? Perfect, non-manipulated tiles.

Photoshop maybe yes. But just some dick left clicking when he thought it was the time to press OK.

Dick = yes. Photoshop = yes. Was the dick smart enough to trim, slim, and shape the original?

100% = no.

[PornGuy]

Addressing the photo as mentioned by the OP. The white line did slip by the person working on the photos but sadly not for the reason anyone thinks and especially not the reasons the OP has added.

Blondie sent the image to us with that white line added and it was supposed to be filled in. She was apparently attempting to cover either a shadow or a tattoo that did not look good in the image.

Had I seen the photo before it ever hit processing it would have been removed. other wise she has not been slimmed or trimmed in any way in that photo.

I am attaching the one she sent us..

We dont know exactly why she sent it like this and it should never have been used.

[GroobyKrissy]

Well, there you have it folks. Speculation and ASS-umptions... get you in trouble every time . Thanks for setting the record straight! PS or not, it is still a lovely picture of a lovely girl!

[GroobyKrissy]

GOOD GRIEF.

Via PM it is now come to my attention (not by a Grooby Productions person - so you can guess who the other party is) that I must say this:

MY THOUGHTS IN THIS MATTER DO NOT IN ANY WAY REPRESENT GROOBY PRODUCTIONS, THE OPINIONS OF GROOBY PRODUCTIONS, THE STAFF OF GROOBY PRODUCTIONS, THE MODELS OF GROOBY PRODUCTIONS, OR ANY OTHER ENTITY NEARLY, OR REMOTELY PART OF GROOBY PRODUCTIONS.

I hope that clears this up. And, like I said via PM... LIGHTEN UP. I get that you don't like the thread. Here's a thought then... don't make such mistakes in the first place. This picture came DIRECTLY from YOUR PROMO CONTENT WHICH YOU HAVE RELEASED PUBLICLY. And when mistakes happen, by your hand, don't blame the people discussing the photo.

Just correct the record and move on. Period. Your responses to me via PM are making this SO MUCH WORSE than the bit of fun it was.