Danni Daniels goes beard :)

[hotboxterrijackson]

Dinner and a Lay: Danni Daniels Cums on Alex Adams
http://www.tsseduction.com/site/shoo...lex-Adams.html
http://www.tsseduction.com/site/shoo...lex-Adams.html
http://www.tsseduction.com/site/shoo...lex-Adams.html
http://www.tsseduction.com/site/shoo...lex-Adams.html

[Jo-Boo]

I always thought she was masculine, but this is overkill.

[LilyRox]

I imagine she's the dream girl for lesbians like buck angel is for gay guys.

[bte]

I know this thread is about Danni Daniels lame excuse for a beard but what the fuck happened to Lara Flynn Boyle. She looks awful.

[hotboxterrijackson]

probably she is HITTING the PIPE

[simonisthebest]

that stuff make me sad for the real transexuals

[GroobySteven]

What a crock of hypocrites.

Danni Daniels is a unique individual. She plays by her own rules and her identity shouldn't have to be pigeon holed by the caged monkeys here.

If there was less of the finger pointing, the whining and the wankers then more people could just be themselves. Fucking hypocrites.

[GroobyKrissy]

I hate to break up such an expert analysis, but there's no such thing as A TRANSGENDER.

That's right. It's not a noun. It's an adjective.

It's like saying "blacks" instead of "black people".

The reason it matters is that you are taking away the humanity of transgender people.

Also, it really just sounds fuckin' stupid and uneducated.

Wait wait wait. Let's not freak out here over misplaced articles. The spirit of the quote is correct - i.e. - facial hair (or lack thereof) is not a determining factor of a person's "TRANSGENDERED" status, which covers the entire spectrum of gender identity issues.

In point of fact, while you may be correct technically (read: grammatically), in stating "It's not a noun. It's an adjective.", one could easily argue that it is THAT description that is more "dehumanizing" as adjectives are typically supporting personal, subjective opinions. And if Transgendered is just an "opinion", then... draw out the logical conclusions. I think you're intelligent enough to see the nuances of what you're implying, which is why I'm posting a reply.

I would state that "Transgendered" is a state of being and therefore not open to outside interpretation, which I believe was the poster's intent, and one that I would, to a certain extent, agree with. Certainly in this case. Unless you're an avid Duck Dynasty Fan or Amish, I don't think having a beard / facial hair determines that you're a man... boobs or not.

[RallyCola]

grammar lessons aside...i must say that i've lost a lot of interest in this performer because this pic turns me off quite a bit.

i am not judging danni...if a person wants to have fluidity in their gender, it is their life to do with what they choose...i am not interested in this person's reality...i'm a porn fan and as a porn fan who only likes women, this image ruins my fantasy.

[Prospero]

I agree with seanchai that this is her choice - and she can be whoever she chooses. Bravo.

But i must also agree with Rallycola that such pictures - peering behind the curtain of the role created by a pornstars s - can sometimes be somewhat shocking. Porn fan want their fantasies undiluted by the reality of the person doing the acting for them and it is rather similar for those who see escorts. They don't want their delight ruffled by hearing about the hardships and private troubles of their brief date.

Sad but too often true.

(Personally i always try to engage with girls i see as a punter. I find I like them even more when i discover the people they are behind the facade of their profession. But i also understand that this is, perhaps, an unusual trait.)